Our work in the 2010-2015 Parliament - Public Administration Contents


2  Scrutiny of the work of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

10. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) is responsible for considering complaints by the public that UK Government departments, public bodies and the NHS in England have not acted properly or fairly or have provided a poor service. The Ombudsman is independent of both the Government and the Civil Service and is the final adjudicator of NHS complaints in England.[5] Under House of Commons Standing Orders we have the power to "examine the reports" of the Ombudsman.[6] The current Ombudsman is Dame Julie Mellor who has held the post since January 2012.[7]

11. As part of our scrutiny of the work of the PHSO, we published a report in April 2014 calling for a people's ombudsman service.[8] This report highlighted the outdated nature of the framework in which the PHSO operates and made a number of recommendations on how to improve it. These included: allowing citizens to directly access the PHSO about public services, without having to take their complaint through their MP; enabling complaints to be made by telephone and online; giving the Ombudsman "own-initiative" powers to investigate areas of concern in government departments, agencies and the NHS without the need to first receive a complaint; and strengthening the accountability of the Ombudsman. In conducting the inquiry, we heard directly from members of the public, holding an informal meeting with people who had submitted information to us about their experience of complaining to PHSO. We also hosted a forum discussion on the MoneySavingExpert website to help shape our evidence session with the PHSO. This experience has led us to change the way we respond to direct approaches from those who have complained through PHSO and who have expressed dissatisfaction. We now take a closer interest in feedback from those who have complained through PHSO, though we continue to respect the independence of PHSO's adjudications. PASC is not and cannot become a mechanism for appealing against PHSO's decisions. We can however learn much from understanding the issues which people raise with us in respect of PHSO, and improve our scrutiny and support for what needs to change at PHSO.[9]

12. In a parallel inquiry to our inquiry Time for a People's Ombudsman Service, we looked at the efficacy of systems across Government for handling complaints. Our Report, More complaints please! concluded that the Government must ensure that leaders in public services value complaints as being critical to improving, and learning about, their service.[10] Our recommendations have been taken up by the Cabinet Office, which is reviewing how complaints handling in government could be better co-ordinated and thus improved.[11]

13. This work also prompted us, as a Committee, to change the way we scrutinise the reports of the Ombudsman. We now hold hearings on PHSO's thematic reports, to interrogate and hold to account those who must respond to its recommendations, in the same way as the Public Accounts Committee has historically held hearings on National Audit Office reports. The first of these sessions, looking at two of the Ombudsman's reports—on severe sepsis and on midwifery supervision and regulation—was held in September 2014.[12] On a previous occasion in 2011 we had similarly examined an Ombudsman report on Equitable Life.[13]

14. More recently, we have looked at how clinical incidents are investigated in the NHS, in the hope of achieving quicker and more effective resolution of incidents of clinical failure locally, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of people whose cases reach as far as the Ombudsman.[14] We concluded that the current system is not fit for purpose. We therefore recommended that local investigative capacity should be strengthened across the NHS. These local systems should be supported by a new, single, independent and accountable investigative body to provide national leadership. Since our inquiry concluded taking evidence, the Government has accepted the principle of this proposal. This should serve as a resource of skills and expertise for the conduct of patient safety incident investigations, and to act as a catalyst to promote a just and open culture across the whole health system.


5   Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 Back

6   House of Commons Standing Orders, December 2013, S.O. No. 146 Back

7   Public Administration Select Committee, Ninth Report of Session 2010-12, Pre-appointment hearing for the post of Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, HC 1220-I, July 2011 Back

8   Public Administration Select Committee, Fourteenth Report of Session 2013-14, Time for a People's Ombudsman Service, HC 655, April 2014 Back

9   Public Administration Select Committee, Sixth Report of Session 2014-15, Investigating clinical incidents in the NHS, HC 886, March 2015 Back

10   Public Administration Select Committee, Twelfth Report of 2013-14, More complaints please!, HC 229, April 2014 Back

11   Public Administration Select Committee, Third Special Report of Session 2014-15, More Complaints Please! and Time for a People's Ombudsman Service: Government Responses to the Committee's Twelfth and Fourteenth Reports of Session 2013-14, HC 618, September 2014 Back

12   Oral evidence taken on 10 September 2014, (2014-15), HC 616, Q 1-99, and oral evidence taken on 10 September 2014, (2014-15), HC 623, Q 1-49 Back

13   Public Administration Select Committee, Third Report of Session 2010-11, Equitable Life, HC 485, October 2010 Back

14   Public Administration Select Committee, Sixth Report of Session 2014-15, Investigating clinical incidents in the NHS, HC 886, March 2015 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 28 March 2015