Investigating clinical incidents in the NHS - Public Administration Contents


4  Conclusion

147. Our inquiry has considered a complicated and changing landscape of enormous importance to some people and potential consequence to anyone. Despite pockets of best practice, good intentions and strong leadership, clinical incident investigation and complaints handling fall far short of what patients, their families, clinicians and NHS staff are entitled to expect. A culture of defensiveness and blame, rather than a positive culture of accountability, pervades much of the NHS. Despite the efforts to implement change, the same atmosphere extends to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, which also needs to change.

148. Clinical incident investigations are often too slow, substandard and in too many cases they exclude patients. No body currently exists to improve them, and nobody is accountable for their quality at a national level or for ensuring that lessons are learned across the NHS. We have identified three key features the proposed new independent patient safety investigation body must have. These are, first, confidentiality, in offering a safe space to talk about what went wrong; second, independence of the rest of the system; and third, transparency, in that its reports, findings and recommendations must be published and disseminated.

149. Our aim in making these proposals is to improve the system to reduce unnecessary suffering among patients and their families in future. The next Government must reform the structures as well as continuing to lead by example in driving culture change. Patients and NHS staff deserve to have incidents investigated properly, without the need to find blame, and regardless of whether a complaint has been raised.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 27 March 2015