The Referendum on Separation for Scotland: Implications for Pensions and Benefits - Scottish Affairs Committee Contents


1  Introduction

1. Of all the issues Scottish voters will have to consider ahead of September's referendum, few can be more important—or more emotive—than pensions and benefits, and the social security system as a whole.[1] Virtually everyone in the UK, at some point in their lives, will receive help from the UK's long-established system of provision, whether in the form of a pension or working-age benefit. A 'yes' vote in September will have a major impact upon social security in Scotland. Scotland would leave the long standing system of sharing risks and resources that underpins the UK welfare state, and be responsible for organising and funding its own welfare system. The Scottish Government say they would move towards a new system based on different principles by 2018, which they claim would be preceded by a transition period of shared administration with the continuing UK, during which time social security policies in the two states would start to diverge.[2] This report discusses what would happen in the event of separation, and the possible effects of these plans.

2. Aside from the vote on separation itself, the unavoidable context for this report is one of historic changes to the UK social security system. The mounting pressure of an ageing population—a phenomenon being felt in many parts of the world—has led to reform of the State Pension, including the first rise in the State Pension Age (SPA) for over sixty years. Meanwhile, major reforms are also being made to working-age welfare, with a number of benefits being combined with the new Universal Credit (UC) system, the primary aim of which—according to the UK Government—is to help improve incentives to work.[3]

3. The Government's reforms to social security have proved controversial throughout the UK. Some have welcomed what they see as a tougher stance that properly incentivises work, while others attack the perceived harshness of the Coalition's reforms. The Holyrood Government's statements on these issues tap into this wider public debate and paint a picture of a future Scottish state that would follow some different path to that currently pursued by the UK.[4] The Scottish Government say that there would be changes to the system which would, on the face of it, make it more generous, with a possible higher pension rate or even earlier retirement age; but they would also make it more expensive. The potential costs are nowhere discussed or detailed in the White Paper.

  1. The Scottish Government's White Paper says much about fairness and social justice, but there is a noticeable lack of facts, clear commitments, and consequences for the people of Scotland. This report therefore draws attention to some of the unanswered questions about the commitments that are being made on pensions and working age benefits by the Scottish Government, and calls for clarification of a number of specifics.



1   In this report, the term 'social security' is used to encompass pensions and a range of working-age benefits and welfare payments. Back

2   Scottish Government, Scotland's Future: Your guide to an independent Scotland (November 2013), p.165.  Back

3   https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/simplifying-the-welfare-system-and-making-sure-work-pays Back

4   "With independence…we can afford to choose a different path for Scotland, with an approach to social justice that is based on our view of what a healthy and flourishing society should be. This is an opportunity for us to create a new Scotland." Scotland's Future,p.151.  Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 6 July 2014