Simon Danczuk - Committee on Standards Contents


1  Report


1. This Report arises from a complaint from Paul Turner-Mitchell that Mr Simon Danczuk had failed to enter in the Register of Members' Financial Interests, within the 28 days required, payments in connection with the publication and serialisation of a book 'Smile for the Camera'. In the course of the Commissioner's inquiry into this allegation, it became clear not only that that Mr Danczuk had failed to register at the appropriate time a number of payments related to the book, but that he continued to make late entries even while the Commissioner was investigating the original allegation. The Commissioner therefore found Mr Danczuk in breach of the Rules of the House in respect of timely registration.

2. Failure to register on time is not, unfortunately, uncommon. Exact figures are not easy to come by, because it is not always necessary to register the date on which a benefit is received. Analysis of the register shows, however, that, in 2014-15, 15% of the payments for employment for which dates were given were registered late. In the absence of a complaint, late registration is usually dealt with by the Registrar of Members' Financial Interests asking the Member to explain and for an assurance that measures have been taken to stop it happening again. The Committee is concerned about late registration and has asked the Commissioner to keep it informed about how often it happens.

3. When the Commissioner finds that a Member has failed to register correctly but that the failure has been minor and inadvertent, she may apply the rectification procedure. In this case, however, although the Commissioner accepts that Mr Danczuk had no intention of concealing any earnings, and although he has apologised to her for the omissions, she decided instead to prepare a memorandum to the Committee. She did so because the sum of money (nearly £20,000) was so large and because the late entries (thirteen in total, of which six related to the publication of the book) were so numerous. We agree with her judgement and are grateful to her for bringing this case to our attention.

4. The Commissioner was concerned that the late entries continued even while she was investigating the original allegation. She is not convinced that Mr Danczuk has yet set up a system which will prevent them. He explained to her that the problem had arisen when the staff member who had previously dealt with his registration entries had left and he had taken the work on himself. He wrote to the Commissioner: "I've considered registration, perhaps incorrectly, a private matter for which I should take responsibility, rather than another member of staff". In interview he explained to her that he found administration difficult and had not prioritised registration as he should.

5. At various times Mr Danczuk made different suggestions as to which of his staff might be given the work of keeping his register entries up-to-date in future: the co-author of the book, his wife or an unspecified 'other member of staff'. Mr Danczuk explained that he planned to "email them a description of the payment received and work carried on every occasion", which the staff member could then format and send to the Registrar. Like the Commissioner, we would welcome evidence of a firm nomination from Mr Danczuk of the staff member who will be given the role, and note that any system will depend not only on the staff member concerned but also on Mr Danczuk himself keeping up to date with the supply of information. The responsibility is of course, as he accepts, ultimately his own.

6. We note that the Commissioner's memorandum concludes "I have also asked the Registrar, if Mr Danczuk is re-elected, to report to me in October 2015 on his registration practices."[1] In view of Mr Danczuk's failure to keep his Register entries up to date in the past year, we support this action. We expect that if the Commissioner continues to have concerns, she will raise them with the Committee.

7. We recommend that Mr Danczuk's late entries appear as if they had been subject to the rectification procedure. We note that he has also apologised to the Commissioner and recommend no additional action in respect of these late registrations.


1   Appendix, para 33 Back


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 19 March 2015