Driving premiums down: fraud and the cost of motor insurance - Transport Committee Contents


ANNEX A

The ABI seeks information from its members which fall into the following description, which has been based around the Fraud Act 2006:

Any party seeking to obtain a benefit under the terms of any insurance related product, service or activity can be shown, on a balance of probabilities, through its actions, to have made or attempted to make a gain or induced or attempted to induce a loss by intentionally and dishonestly:

·  Making a false representation, and/or

·  Failing to disclose information, and/or

·  Having abused the relevant party's position.

And, one or more of the following outcomes has taken place which relates to the fraudulent act:

·  An insurance policy application has been refused

·  An insurance policy or contract has been voided, terminated or cancelled

·  A claim under an insurance policy has been repudiated

·  A successful prosecution for fraud, the tort of deceit or contempt of court has been brought

·  The relevant party has formally accepted his/her guilt in relation to the fraudulent act in question including, but not limited to, accepting a police caution

·  An insurer has terminated a contract or a non-contracted relationship/recognition with a supplier or provider

·   An insurer has attempted to stop/recover or refused a payment(s) made in relation to a transaction

·  An insurer has challenged or demonstrated that a change to standing policy data was made without the relevant customer's authority

Provided that the relevant party has been notified that its claim has been repudiated, or relevant policy or contract voided, terminated, or cancelled, for reasons of fraud and/or it is in breach of the relevant terms and conditions relating to fraud within the relevant policy or contract.

The ABI also collects information from its members relating to cases of Suspected Insurance Fraud.

Where a handler having an actual suspicion of fraud (eg manual fraud indicator(s), tip off, system generated "high risk" referral etc) challenges the applicant/claimant by letter, telephone call or instruction of an investigator etc, to clarify key information, provide additional information or documentation etc, and the applicant/claimant subsequently:

·  Fails to provide further documentation or co-operation

·  Formally withdraws the application/claim (by phone, e-mail or letter) without a credible explanation.

·  Allows all communication with the insurer to lapse despite the insurer's reasonable attempts to re-establish contact.

·  Accepts (without a credible explanation) either a substantially reduced settlement offer in respect of a claim, or a substantially increased premium in respect of an application/renewal (other than in cases where there has been a careless misrepresentation).

All other gone away claims/applications arising in the course of normal (i.e. non exceptional) handling do not represent suspected fraud under this definition. These would include (but not necessarily be limited to):

·  Gone away/withdrawn claims or applications when no preceding combination of suspicion and subsequent challenge has occurred.

·  Gone away/withdrawn claims or applications where a "challenge" is applied to all new claims/applications of a particular class (e.g. Household accidental damage) as a matter of routine.

·  Lapsed quotes, where no formal application for insurance cover has been made.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2014
Prepared 24 October 2014