Please describe in no more than 2 pages your state or organization’s contributions to the work of the Arctic Council’s Working Groups, Task Forces and/or Expert Groups since the time of your most recent report, or in the previous two years. Please highlight contributions to specific projects, such as through proposals, concept development, in-kind and financial support, and hosting of meetings. If applicable, please include mention of collaboration with Permanent Participants, such as project proposal endorsement and support.
The UK is the Arctic’s closest neighbour and has an over 400 year old relationship with the region, from the voyages of men like Frobisher and Franklin to today’s cutting edge scientific research. The UK’s long-standing ties, continued interests and engagement with the Arctic is reflected in the fact that the UK was an accredited Observer at the first AEPS Meeting in 1991 and the UK was listed as an Observer in the initial rules of procedure of the Arctic Council. The UK has been represented, by officials from London, at every Senior Arctic Officials and Ministerial Meeting of the Council since 1996 and has always constructively engaged with the Council.
In October 2013 the UK Government published its Arctic Policy Framework: Adapting to Change, which for the first time sets out UK interests in and policy towards the Arctic. The policy framework set out the UK’s vision for the Arctic as “an Arctic that is safe and secure; well governed in conjunction with indigenous peoples and in line with international law; where policies are developed on the basis of sound science with full regard to the environment; and where only responsible development takes place”.
It outlines what expertise the UK can offer to help meet some of the long term challenges facing the region and to ensure a sustainable future and therefore provides the framework for supporting the goals of the Arctic Council. This was reiterated in 2015 in the Governments Response to the House of Lords Select committee on the Arctic Report (2015).
The UK continues to be fully engaged and directly contribute to the work and the objectives of the Arctic Council’s Working Groups, Task Forces and Expert Groups. For example:
The UK strongly supports the role of Permanent Participants in the Arctic Council and welcomes their unique and essential input into Council discussions. At the Arctic Circle Assembly in 2015 the UK presented a well received and successful breakout session on Traditional Knowledge-based Innovation in the Age of Climate Change. We continue to have constructive and useful discussions with Permanent Participants on issues of mutual concern/benefit. The UK and Permanent Participants share a great concern over climate change and its effects. We are well aware of the value of local knowledge/memory in determining the level and effects of climate change on the Arctic and its communities.
If applicable, please describe in no more than 1 page your state or organization’s future plans for contributing to the work of the Arctic Council’s Working Groups, Task Forces and/or Expert Groups. Please highlight intentions to contribute to specific projects and to collaborate with Permanent Participants.
The UK is committed to continuing to support the work of the Working Groups and is keen to explore ways in which to better coordinate science programmes and other initiatives. Identifying common ground and improving synergies, cooperation and collaboration will then make it easier to contribute more directly and substantially to the Working Groups, (in particular, CAFF, AMAP and PAME) by ensuring for example that where appropriate the future funding of NERC science programmes takes these elements into account.
Our continuing and future contributions to specific projects are highlighted below:
Following the success of its previous four year Arctic Research Programme, NERC announced in 2015 the investment of a further £16m in a new five year research programme (covering the period 2017-2022). The overarching goal of which is to explore the effect of changes to ice cover on the marine ecosystem and the associated biochemistry of the Arctic Ocean. The aims are to understand the potential major impacts of environmental change in the Arctic and provide projections for future ecosystems services. This knowledge will help to develop mitigation and adaption strategies to manage these effects. A key principle in determining what to invest these funds will be the strength and depth of international cooperation including links with priorities of the Arctic Council Working Groups.
If applicable, please describe in no more than 1 page your state or organization’s contributions to other aspects of the Arctic Council and its goals not covered by the previous sections since the time of your most recent report, or in the previous two years.
The UK plays an active role in many relevant international bodies and agreements including the IMO, UN (especially in respect of UNCLOS), CBD and OSPAR, all of which contribute to the orderly management and governance of the wider Arctic region. The UK has made significant contribution to the development of the IMO’s Polar Code under the SOLAS and MARPOL Conventions, including acting as the Chairman of the groups that developed the environmental aspects.
The UK maintains good bilateral and multilateral relations with all the Arctic States both generally and in relation to polar matters and is keen to maintain this position. The UK’s Memorandum of Understanding with Canada is an excellent example of bilateral cooperation. The primary aim is to facilitate exchange of scientific knowledge, expertise and facilities. We are beginning discussions with Canadian authorities on reviewing the agreement, to fully reflect current priorities. The UK also has a polar Memorandum of Understanding with Norway, which includes Arctic research and which is currently also being renewed.
The UK promotes the Arctic Council wherever appropriate and possible to do so and considers that education and outreach are important in order to promote the Arctic and the work of the Arctic Council. The FCO developed website “Discovering the Arctic” is aimed at school children and provides a guide to the Arctic, its people and institutions. UK Government Ministers have also highlighted the importance of the Arctic Council and the UK’s position as an Observer in several debates in the Houses of Parliament, most recently in 2015.
The UK is a committed member of the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) and has a large body of Arctic scientists at a range of institutions across the UK. A number of universities and national institutions have large Arctic research programmes, such as those at Swansea, Leeds and Stirling Universities. The Scott Polar Research Institute and Scottish Association for Marine Science are both deeply involved in the Arctic, as are the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), who increasingly deploy their internationally renowned polar scientists and resources in the region and continues to host the UK Arctic Office, at their headquarters in Cambridge.
The UK continues to view the Arctic Council as the primary regional body; it represents a unique forum to help ensure sustainable management of the region. The UK recognises that a peaceful, stable and well-governed Arctic is the bedrock on which all of the Government’s policies towards the Arctic are based. As an Observer, the UK has contributed scientific and policy expertise to various expert, working groups and major reports produced by the Arctic Council. The UK intends to continue this high level of engagement and considers that the Arctic Council could benefit from greater UK and other State Observer participation in order to achieve common goals, and we recognise that steps have been made toward this by the US Chairmanship. The UK has been actively engaged in the Council for the last 20 years and we remain committed to doing so.
Published: 16 March 2019