Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Mr W A Twemlow (DCH 30)

  I am a humble solicitor with some experience of acting for charities.

  I find it extraordinary that (unless I have missed something) the draft Charities Bill is totally silent upon the issue as to what happens to the assets of a charity which has previously been presumed to be for the public benefit but ceases to be a charity by virtue of the change in the law proposed by Clause 3 of the bill. Under existing charity law the assets of a charity must stay in the charitable sector and be applied cy-pres for the benefit of other charities. Is it the Government's intention that that should be the case in the circumstances I have described (leading, presumably, to the closure of the institutions which fall into this category) or is it the Government's hope that all such charities will strive so hard to satisfy the "public benefit" test as to stay in the charity "sector" so that the problem simply will not arise? If the latter, that appear to be an extremely risky stance for the Government to take. At the very least, it would seem to me, the Home Secretary has an obligation to explain what is the Government's policy on this issue, but I have not been able to find any answer to this point in the various notes and other information available on the Home Office website.

June 2004



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 September 2004