Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


Further memorandum from Bates, Wells and Braithwaite (DCH 294)

TRUSTEE INDEMNITY INSURANCE

1.  INTRODUCTION

  Bates, Wells and Braithwaite is one of the leading charity law firms in the country. This submission supplements the detailed submission to the pre-legislative scrutiny of the Joint Houses of Parliament sent to the Committee by Bates, Wells & Braithwaite on 24 June 2004.

2.  TRUSTEE INDEMNITY INSURANCE

  2.1  I believe that the draft Charities Bill is an opportunity to amend the unsatisfactory legal and procedural position regarding the ability of trustees of charities to take out indemnity insurance.

    2.1.1     Trustee indemnity insurance provides personal protection to the trustees of charities in the event that they are found to have committed a breach of trust and, in the case of charitable companies, are guilty of fraudulent or wrongful trading.

    2.1.2     Since this type of insurance is considered to confer a personal benefit on trustees, the Charity Commission has always taken the view that the premiums on such policies cannot be met by the charity in the absence of specific power to that effect in the charity's constitution.

    2.1.3     Most modern constitutions, therefore, including the Charity Commission's models, include such a power. The problem arises in the case of older charities, where there is frequently no such power.

    2.1.4     However, in increasingly litigious times, trustee indemnity insurance is often a pre-requisite to suitable individuals agreeing to serve on trustee boards.

    2.1.5     The solution is for the charity in question to apply to the Charity Commission for permission to take out such insurance, which may include amending the charity's constitution. Charity Commission practice in this area has become more relaxed in recent years, and takes a more proportionate approach to this issue than was frequently the case in the past. However, despite the Charity Commission's flexible approach, the procedure of applying to the Commission can be costly for a charity in terms of both time and money.

  2.2  My suggestion is that the Bill should be amended to include a power for trustees of all charities to take out trustee indemnity insurance, subject to safeguards similar to those imposed in clause 27 of the Bill in relation to the proposed new power to remunerate trustees who provide services to the charity.

July 2004




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 September 2004