Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Alzheimer's Society, Tyne & Wear (DCH 215)

  Thank you for your letter requesting feedback from the branch on the Draft Charities Bill. I am pleased to have the opportunity to comment.

  Broadly speaking I support the comments made by the NCVO, which our national Society has contributed to. However, as a local branch manager I have tried to give each of your points some consideration and address those which will have the greatest effect on our work:

    —  Trading:  The Alzheimer's Society already has incurred the cost of setting up a trading company but a relaxation in the administrative burden would be welcomed, particularly as we only derive a small amount of our income from primary purpose trades. For example, Christmas cards, which members of the public will buy in order to contribute to our funds. A relaxation in this area could not be seen as increased competition to commercial traders or damage public confidence.

    —  Delivery of Public Services: The factors which could limit us in this area are the increased burden of public liability insurance and professional indemnity insurance for trustees. Also, the failure to share risks between the service provider and the commissioning body could deter many from becoming involved in this area. The burden of irrecoverable VAT for charities delivering public services would also mean that we start from a disadvantaged position.

    —  Fundraising:  I am concerned as to how the extension of "public place" to cover supermarkets would affect our collections. In the past we have been able to fundraise very successfully in this area.

  I hope you have found these comments useful and I thank you again for this opportunity to be involved.

Johanne Mears

Branch Manager




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 September 2004