Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


Annex

THE STRATEGY UNIT REVIEW, "PRIVATE ACTION, PUBLIC BENEFIT" ACTION ON DISABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, ADD'S RESPONSE

  ADD welcomes the review and the recognition by government of the important role that the sector plays in society.

  We also welcome the recommendations for reform and would encourage that these are tabled with parliament as soon as possible. Framing and implementation of these reforms needs to be taken forward in consultation with the sector and the various network bodies eg NCVO and ACEVO etc. Clearly there is a need for a new charity law that better reflects the nature of the sector's work and enables this work to flourish.

  We welcome the report's emphasis on demonstrating that our aims are being met through emphasis on outcomes and more holistic reporting methods including bench-marking between similar organisations.

  Public confidence in the sector is important and we should be striving to provide the right information to ensure trust in our work.

NAME—NOT "CHARITY"

  We would welcome a change away from using the word "charity" that is seen by many as based on an outdated model and approach. For organizations such as ADD who are working internationally and who are pursuing a rights-based approach to our work, being called a registered "charity" can cause confusion.

  Voluntary sector also gives a message that our work is carried out by volunteers which in many cases it is not. Social enterprise is not relevant for organisations who are not providing services or generating returns from trading.

  We would recommend using the community or not for profit sector or civil society.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

  ADD welcomes the new purposes for not for profit activity in the public benefit and in particular the addition of "prevention" of poverty and the promotion of human rights.

CAMPAIGNING

  We welcome the recommendations regarding this. ADD supports disabled people's organisations in Africa and Asia to campaign for their rights and inclusion in society. Campaigning groups seek enabling and enforcing legislation as this is vital step if discrimination and marginalisation is to be overcome.

  One of the roles of civil society in a democratic system is to hold governments accountable and advocacy and campaigning is a way of ensuring that the public's interests are heard.

TRADING

  We can see the advantages in being able to trade without establishing a trading company and welcome this. However it will be important for the new regulator to provide advice to organisations about this to ensure a failed business initiative does not effect the public benefit work of the organisation.

NEW LEGAL FORM

  The introduction of a new form of incorporation will hopefully reduce administration by providing a single registration. Allowing an organisation to be registered once to receive benefits associated with public interest status while at the same time protecting trustees and staff form personal liability is welcomed.

  The name Charitable Incorporated Organisation needs changing—perhaps Not For Profit Incorporated Organisation.

ACCOUNTABILITY AND PROVISION OF INFORMATION

  ADD welcomes the review's recommendations in these areas. We recognise the need for public accountability as well as the importance of providing useful information relating to the achievements and long term outcomes and impact of an organisation's work.

  We also agree that this information should be based on shared good practice and "bench marking" between like orgnaisations rather than league tables. Given the wide scope of activities carried out in the sector, league tables across all would be meaningless and confusing.

STANDARD INFORMATION RETURN

  A Standard Information Return (SIR) should be a useful management tool for organisations themselves as well as providing better information to the public.

  Greater emphasis on outcomes is welcomed—however this will be an area that many organisations will need help in. There is a danger of going down the "measurement" route and forgetting that judgements and trust are also needed.

  However it is important that public confidence in the sector is maintained and if SORP and the audited accounts of charities are not seen by the public as helpful this needs to be looked into. The sector is already embracing a wide range of quality and evaluation models for management (and external purposes) to help us learn how better to achieve our objectives efficiently, effectively and economically.

  The use of an auditor to check the SIR and make quality assessments is likely to be beyond the current role of external auditors.

APPORTIONING COSTS AND EXPENDITURE

  As the recent publication from ACEVO "Funding Our Future II" outlines it is important for the sector to be clear about our costs, to ensure these are proportional—based on bench marking against our colleagues and competitors and to apportion these cost appropriately. This is vital for the health of the sector to ensure that the infrastructure of organisations is being invested in and that outcomes are being realised.

MEASURING AND IMPROVING PERFORMANCE

  The international development organizations have been working on the issue of better demonstration of impact and sustainable change for many years. Measuring long term impact is much more difficult than measuring outputs as long term change may well be contributed to by an organisation's work but may well not be directly attributable.

  However it is important that organisations can demonstrate achievement of their aims while not getting caught up in processes which consume more energy than they deliver in terms of improved performance.

REVIEW OF THE CHARITY COMMISSION

  A new act, new definitions, new terminology and new approaches to delivering public interest objectives will no doubt require a review and renaming of the commission.

  ADD has found the commission a useful source of information and advice as well as being the regulator and hope that both functions can still be provided as is suggested in the recommendation for advice on mergers.

FUNDRAISING

  Regulation to maintain public confidence and promote good practice in the sector is important. Where possible existing codes of good practice and structures such as those provided by the Institute of Fundraisers and the Public Fundraising Regulatory body, PFRA, should be built on as much work has already gone into this.

GOVERNANCE AND TRUSTEESHIP

  Good governance and effective recruitment and induction of trustees is essential to the effective operation of organisations, and steps to encourage diversity on boards and an equal opportunities approach to selection and training are welcomed.

  Paying trustees to carry out professional services is an issue that may be difficult for organisations to manage and the review comments on the conflict of interest that could result. Furthermore in the case of a grievance by either party the conflict of a trustee being employer and employee may be very damaging.

VAT-EXEMPTION

  The review does not mention the issue of VAT. This is of major concern to the sector and needs re-visiting.

  Good luck with the next stage and here's to seeing an enabling framework in place that promotes the work of the community sector.

Barbara Frost

Chief Executive, Action on Disability and Development




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 September 2004