Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Village Retail Services Association ViRSA Educational Trust—Registered Charity Number 1062229 (DCH 72)

  ViRSA has operated for 10 years in its objective of helping small rural communities to revive or retrieve their retail outlets through community participation. ViRSA covers all of England with a network of fieldworkers. The fieldworkers assist those communities wishing to invest in their own future to follow a proven path towards providing a social enterprise that meets the needs of the community and its customers.

1.  PART 1. THE MEANING OF CHARITY AND CHARITABLE PURPOSE

  The introduction of additional charity heads is welcomed particularly that under paragraph 3.2 (e)—the advancement of community development. The introduction of this head should afford those social enterprises that ViRSA helps to create the opportunity of being accorded charitable status. What is more most of these social enterprises are now registered as Industrial and Provident Societies (IPS) under the classification of Benefit of the Community, this being proved by the adoption of "special rules" in to the constitution for the Association.

  Any refining definition of "public benefit" in the Bill must reflect the objectives of the social enterprises such as those created by ViRSA. For clarity of purpose I consider the definition needs no further amplification within the Bill.

  The re-introduction or retention of services by the creation of social enterprises also satisfies the charitable head at 3.2 (j)—relief of those in need etc.

  The creation of charitable incorporated or unincorporated community associations that are able to trade for the benefit of the community, as a social enterprise would add to the Government's need to increase the participation of the Voluntary Sector as a deliverer and provider of rural services.

2.  PART 2. CHAPTERS 1 & 2. THE CHARITY COMMISSION

  The reorganization of the Charity Commission (CC) appears to be a move in the right direction but without more detailed knowledge of the workings of the CC and the proposals for improvement, I will not comment further. As a general comment the public relations aspects of the CC do require a makeover. I presume the planned "CC open Annual General Meeting at which to present its report and answer questions" will be held on a regional basis so that exposure may be to the widest possible audience.

  Registration and Regulation of an increasing number of charities will of necessity require a "light touch" approach towards their management. The introduction of broadband may help in the dissemination of information.

3.  PART 2 CHAPS 6 & 7—AUDIT LEVELS

  The raising of the income levels for audit thresholds is welcomed and supported.

4.  PART 2 CHAPTER 8—THE CHARITABLE INCORPORATED ORGANISATION (CIO)

  The proposal to introduce the CIO is the second most exciting prospect in the Draft Bill (the first being the increase in the number of charitable heads). The CIO as a vehicle to disentangle Charity structures from that of companies is to be welcomed. I assume the CIO will provide enhanced benefits to that provided by the Company Limited by Guarantee (CLG) including liability protection for trustees, its own SORP and a simple registration and accounting procedure.

5.  PART 2 CHAPTER 9—CHARITY TRUSTEES

  Training for Trustees should be introduced not as a requirement but as a "beacon standard" similar to that obtained by duly qualified Parish Council clerks. Chairman of Boards of Trustees should be encouraged to attain a minimum standard laid down by the CC.

  The proposal that a trustee body may have the statutory power to pay an individual trustee to provide a service to a charity (outside their duties as a trustee) if it in charity's interests to do so appears equitable although some safeguards against a conflict of interests may be required.

  The provision for direct approach to the CC by Trustees is welcome although interactive facility should also be implemented with appropriate IT safeguards.

  The introduction of conditional payment to Trustees for particular services not related to their conduct as a Trustee appears laborious and impracticable in application particularly in a small charity.

6.  PART 3—FUNDING FOR CHARITIES

  The proposal that the Secretary of State fund particular charities operating in England is welcomed. The challenges facing fundraisers increases each year due to the parlous state of funds available though traditional sources.

June 2004




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 September 2004