Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 218 A R Mears

Ms Francene Graham

Scrutiny Unit

Committee Office

House of Commons

7 Millbank

London SW1P 3JA

1.7.2004

Dear Madam

DRAFT CHARITIES BILL

The enclosed submission to the Joint Committee deals with a matter peripheral to its main interest but one which is currently of considerable concern to the Home Office. The drafters of this bill seem to have relied on precedent rather than considering the consequences of their actions. It will be objected that inclusion of the proposed penalties, they having been little used in the past, is of no great consequence. However, every opportunity should be taken to ensure that legislation is viable.

Yours faithfully

ARMears

PENALTIES FOR INFRINGEMENT

OF THE CHARITIES ACT

1. PENALTIES

Amendments proposed to the 1993 Act and sections in the Act not proposed for amendment relate to the penalties that can be imposed for infringements of the Act as follows.

2. CLAUSE 21 Power to enter premises (p 29)

The proposed Section 31A(10) empowers the courts to impose on persons convicted of intentionally obstructing an employee of the Commission in the pursuit of information relevant to an enquiry under section 8 the alternative penalties of (a) 3 months imprisonment, or (b) a level 5 fine, or both.

3. CLAUSE 28 Disqualification of trustee receiving remuneration by virtue of section 27 (p 37)

The proposed Section 73C(4) empowers the courts to impose on persons convicted of acting as a trustee while disqualified the alternative penalties of (a) 6 months imprisonment or a maximum statutory fine, or (b) 2 years imprisonment or a fine, or both.

4. CHARITIES ACT 1993 Section 11 Supply of false or misleading information to Commissioners

The existing Section 11(3), (not proposed for amendment), empowers the courts to impose on persons convicted of knowingly or recklessly providing the Commissioners with false or misleading information the alternative penalties of (a) a maximum statutory fine, or (b) 2 years imprisonment, or both.

5. The Joint Committee should consider whether the freedom of the courts to impose short term prison sentences should be included in the Charities Act 2005 bearing in mind:

  • the current prison population of over 70 000, with serious overcrowding, and projected by the Home Office to increase over 100 000,
  • the expense and ineffectiveness of short term confinement,

  • the existence of new community penalties, and

  • the opportunity now before the Joint Committee to set a wise example.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 August 2004