Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 311 Baker Tilly

Evidence Submitted by

Baker Tilly

To The Joint Committee on the Draft Charity Bill


Background

Baker Tilly is a large national accountancy practice, ranked 7th in the country. Our charity work is undertaken throughout the country.

We provide audit and advisory services to over 1,000 charities and educational establishments ranging from large national charities and charitable trusts to religious orders, independent schools and colleges of further education.

We are the largest provider of services to the Top 3,000 Charities (Source: CaritasData Top 3000, 2004 Edition) and to colleges of further education. We are one of the top three firms advising independent schools.

General Comments

Baker Tilly welcomes the publication of the draft Charity Bill and supports its recommendations.

Our comments are based on the experience of our clients, and detailed illustrations of the matters we have highlighted can be provided if required.

Trading

Baker Tilly supports the further consideration of trading by charities since this is an area of charity operations that causes our clients considerable administrative and operational difficulties.

Firstly, it is important to note that the issue of concern relates to commercial or non-primary purpose trading. Many charities undertake primary purpose trading, being trading activities within their charitable objects.

The provisions in Finance Act 2000 enabling small-scale non-primary purpose trading by charities up to income levels of £50,000 for larger charities have been widely used and have been most helpful to the sector. This has enabled relatively small-scale trading to be undertaken in a straight-forward and efficient manner. We are not aware of any specific concerns that this regulatory relaxation has caused.

Where commercial trading undertaken by a subsidiary trading company is more substantial there is wide spread mis-understanding that this will always be tax efficient. Generally, trading subsidiaries avoid corporation tax being incurred on their profits by making gift aid donations of these profits to the charity parent. Where working capital or other financing needs of the trade are met by a loan the subsidiary will incur a tax charge since to repay the loan will involve the retention of profits by the subsidiary.

We also note that some charities undertake their charitable activities through trading subsidiaries, occasionally due to concerns that these may have minor non-primary purpose elements.

Operating a trading company places a considerable administration burden on charities along with the associated costs. However, for more substantial or higher risk trading it is likely that charities will consider this necessary in order to provide protection to charity property.

We also note that corporate sponsorship often forms a considerable part of current non-primary purpose trading activity. Often this form of support is essentially a corporate donation, which will have no impact on competition with local businesses.

A further consideration made by charities in seeking to undertake trading activities is that these may represent business activities for VAT purposes. This may give scope to recover some irrecoverable VAT incurred by the charity.





Group Accounts

Thresholds for annual audits included in the draft Bill include both entity and group account tests. Although unincorporated charities with subsidiary undertakings prepare group accounts as required by accounting standards and the Charities Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP), there is no provision under the Charities Act 1993 and accounting and reporting regulations for such accounts to be prepared. Legislation only recognises entity accounts for the charity alone, although the Charity Commission normally accepts the submission of group accounts by exception.

In practice we note that charities do not prepare separate entity and group accounts but take advantage of the provisions set out in the Charities SORP not to do so.

We would support changes that remove these anomalies.

Baker Tilly

15 July 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 August 2004