Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 165 Cannon Martin Lee

SUBMISSION TO THE SCRUTINIES UNIT AT THE HOUSE OF COMMONS REGARDING THE DRAFT CHARITIES BILL 2004



1.  I am the Financial Officer for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Southwark, a registered charity. I am writing to register some concerns which I believe should be addressed and resolved before the Bill is put to parliament and legislation enacted.

2.  I am not an expert in legal matters and it may be that my points are redundant or ill-informed. I have not had time to take proper advice on the matters I am commenting on prior to the deadline of 21st June 2004.

3.  Exempt Charities - Section 23 Para 1 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 establishes that the Governing Body of any Voluntary School is an exempt charity. Section 23 para 2 also establishes as an exempt charity any institution enlisted by such a Governing Body for purposes of the School.

4.  Under the 1960 and 1993 Charities Acts as I understand them, a Body can only register with the Charity Commissioners as a charity if all its objects were charitable. It seems to me under the draft Bill that this requirement is now made a condition of being a charity of any kind whatsoever, rather than simply a requirement of being registered as a charity with the Charity Commissioners. Now the Governing Body of a Voluntary School does not have objects all of which are wholly charitable. As well as the activities envisaged under Section 23 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, Governing Bodies of Voluntary Schools in common with Governing Bodies of Community Schools which are not charities, all have delegated budgets - School Standards and Framework Act 1998 Section 49 Para 1. The Governing Body of the School spends the budget as the authority's agent - Section 49 Para 5 (b). Not only however do Governors act as agents for the LEA in spending the budget, they have furthermore the right to manage the School's budget - Section 49 Para 7(a). This is further developed in Section 50 Para 3. Therefore by shifting the significance of wholly charitable purposes from the question of registering a charity to the main being of a charity itself, the draft Bill would appear to put a threat to the very existence of Voluntary Aided Governing Bodies as charities.

5.  I am aware of section 1, subsection 2 of the draft bill, but I am unclear whether the wording covers this case.

6.  I turn to the question of presumption of public benefit. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Southwark has a consolidated Trust Deed which establishes a registered charity. If the Diocese is going to be required to establish its existence as a charity is of public benefit, then perhaps it is time the law in England accorded some official recognition to Roman Catholic Dioceses. The following two pages contain quotes from parliamentary exchanges on this topic.

Appendix :

Quotes from Hansard

7. Monday 18th May 1992

PRIME MINISTER

Roman Catholic Church

Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Prime Minister if he will now make it the policy of Her Majesty's Government to accord the same degree of official recognition to the territorial sees and titles of the Roman Catholic Church in England and in Wales as is accorded to the unestablished Anglican churches outside England ; and if he will make a statement on the situation in Northern Ireland.

The Prime Minister : Official recognition for Roman Catholic territorial titles was precluded under Acts of 1829

Column 6

and 1851, the penal provisions of which were repealed in 1871 and 1978. Since it was raised with me by Sir Hugh Rossi in the last Parliament I have been looking sympathetically at the matter and my right hon. and learned Friend the Home Secretary will now be consulting the relevant Church authorities about the practices to be adopted in future.

8. Thursday 10th December 1992

Sees and Titles

Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Prime Minister (1) pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Eltham of 18 May, Official Report, column 5, whether the consultation of Church authorities includes the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales ;

Column 748

(2) what changes he proposes to official recognition of territorial sees of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland or, in so far as restrictions apply, in Northern Ireland ;

(3) when he expects to propose changes to official recognition of territorial sees and titles of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales.

The Prime Minister : Consultations with Church authorities and others about the official recognition of Roman Catholic territorial designations within the United Kingdom are making good progress but have not yet been completed. We shall be seeking the views of the relevant Roman Catholic authorities as part of that consultation.

9. Monday 14th December 1992

HOME DEPARTMENT

Sees and Titles

Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when he expects to conclude consultation with the Roman Catholic Church on the official recognition of territorial sees and titles ;

(2) if he will give a summary of action taken on consultations following the Prime Minister's statement on 18 May, Official Report, columns 5-6, about the consideration of official recognition of territorial sees and titles of the Roman Catholic Church ; (3) if he will make a statement on progress towards official recognition of territorial sees and titles of the Roman Catholic Church.

Mr. Charles Wardle : I refer my hon. Friend to the reply he was given by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 10 December, at columns 753-54.

Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received in opposition to official recognition of territorial sees and titles of the Roman Catholic Church.

Mr. Charles Wardle : This department has received two letters expressing concern about the possibility of greater recognition being afforded to Roman Catholic territorial sees and titles.

Catholic Bishops Conference

Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he provided a substantive reply to the letters dated 16 July and 7 October from the Right Rev. Monsignor Philip Carroll, General Secretary of the Catholic Bishops Conference.

Mr. Charles Wardle : An interim reply was sent on 28 July. My right hon. and learned Friend hopes to be in a position to respond to the substantive points raised in those letters very shortly.

10. 17 Nov 2003 : Column 687W

Discrimination (Catholic Subjects)

Mr. Gummer: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what restrictions upon Her Majesty's Catholic subjects are contained in legislation for which his Department is responsible; and whether he intends to introduce legislation to repeal them as part of the new legislation against religious discrimination. [137816]

(2) whether he intends to introduce legislation to remove discrimination against Catholic subjects of the Crown; and if he will make a statement; [137817]

(3) if he will make a statement on his policy towards the enforcement of laws that discriminate against Her Majesty's Catholic subjects. [137818]

Fiona Mactaggart: I will write to the right hon. Member about the matters he has raised.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 August 2004