Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 78 Tenovus

From: Peter Searle [Peter.Searle@tenovus.com]Sent: 16 June 2004 15:16To: scrutiny@parliament.ukSubject: F.A.O Francene Graham

Dear Francene Graham,

Re: Draft Charities Bill.

We write as part of response to the draft charities bill in relation to door to door collections.

We are a registered charity with 55 shops in England and Wales selling donated goods.

Much of these goods are collected through door to door collections and we welcome the proposed changes which will remove the current licensing regime and remove the burden of having to apply for individual permits from local authorities for smaller charities.

However we are concerned about the benefits of deregulation being negated by the proposed requirement to notify local authorities of the precise day or date of each collection at least 14 days in advance and no more than 6 months in advance.

This is, in our view, a disproportionably detailed notification scheme which will not only cost the charity a great deal of time and resource to administer but will create a bureaucratic nightmare for the local authority.

The way our collections for donated goods are organised needs to be kept flexible so that we can respond to immediate local needs and the availability of our stock collectors many of whom are volunteers.

Lack of storage space means that long term planning of collections is not practicable and to have to give at least 14 days notice will cause stock shortages and damage to the good causes which the charity supports.

We would support changes in the legislation that required notification of door to door collection of donated goods by charities, to local authorities, on a more periodic basis (eg. Every 6 months or annually) and with more general information regarding timing and frequency. There should not be a requirement for notification of every individual collection.

We believe that these proposed changes will also be welcomed by the local authorities. As members of the Association of Charities Shops, we operate to agreed standards and guidelines issued by the Association in relation to door to door guidelines of donated stock. The real menace to the public comes from fraudulent companies who move into an area and blitz that area with collection sacks, often misleading the public.

What is proposed in the new legislation would not stop such collections but what is required is for the ability of Trading Standards and the Police where applicable, to be able to act where collections have taken place without prior notification or where other aspects of the law are believed to have been broken.


Peter Searle

Tenovus the cancer charity

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of Tenovus. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify postmaster@tenovus.com

Tenovus reserves the right to monitor all internal and external communications at any time.

Tenovus43 The ParadeCardiffCF24 3ABT: +44 (0)29 2048 2000F: +44 (0)29 2048 4199W: www.tenovus.com


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 July 2004