Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 52 Community Action Hampshire

Comments on Draft Charities Bill

From: Community Action Hampshire, a countywide Council for Voluntary Service and Rural Community Council

1.0 Clauses 1-3: definition of charity and public benefit test

It is imperative that the requirement to deliver public benefit is more robust than currently envisaged. Whilst expanding the list of charitable purposes may be laudable, and encourage active citizenship, there is a danger of the term 'charity' becoming debased and discredited. At the heart of charitable activity should be the drive to make society a fairer place, ironing out inequalities and disadvantages. Therefore while certain categories of charitable purposes, (eg education, health, amateur sport) could deliver real benefits, they could equally, and indeed are currently seen to, discriminate against large sections of the community because of the way those services are delivered. Occasional use of facilities by the community should not qualify as delivering public benefit. 'Advancement of religion' is another example of where the public benefit test must be vigorously applied, as advancement of religion per se could mitigate against social cohesion.

1.1 The Charity Commission must undertake a rolling programme to check that public benefit is being delivered.

2.0 Clause 21: Power to enter premises

The draft Bill gives the Charity Commission considerable additional regulatory powers, eg power of entry into premises, the right to seize documents, etc and at the same time it is expected to act as an advisory service to the sector. This could be seen as a barrier, not so much for the larger charities, but certainly the smaller ones, who would normally readily seek advice. If they suspect that the Commission is going to leap on them for some misdemeanour, are they going to contact them? Consideration should be given to contracting out the advisory service, possibly to an organisation such as the NCVO at national level, but preferably to the lowest level possible (organisations like to source advice and assistance as close to home as possible), therefore to a subregional body or consortium/network.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 July 2004