Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill Written Evidence


DCH 104 The Girls' Day School Trust

From the Chief Exexutive

Ms. F. Graham BH/AT

Committee Assistant to the Joint Committee

on the Draft Charities Bill

Scrutiny Unit

Room G10

7 Millbank

London SW1P 3JA 18th June 2004




Dear Ms. Graham,

Further to my e.mail today, I enclose a hard copy of the evidence that the Girls' Day School Trust wishes to submit to the Joint Committee.

Yours sincerely,


EVIDENCE FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE DRAFT CHARITIES BILL - SUBMITTED BY THE GIRLS' DAY SCHOOL TRUST

1.1 The Council of The Girls' Day School Trust ('GDST') (Registered Charity Number 306988) welcomes publication of the draft Charities Bill.

1.2 The GDST is a member of the Independent Schools' Council ('ISC') and fully endorses the views of ISC submitted in its evidence dated 2nd and 15th June 2004.

1.3 As the largest group of Independent Schools in the United Kingdom, the GDST would also like to offer the following observations to assist the Joint Committee in its deliberations on the issue of public benefit.

2.1 The GDST was founded in 1872, with the object of establishing and operating good and affordable day schools for girls. It does not benefit from substantial endowments, and its income is derived from fees, which are set at a level to cover the costs of providing education to its pupils; any surplus is invested back into the schools. There are currently around 19,500 pupils aged 3-18 and 3,500 staff in its 24 schools in England and 1 in Wales. This represents about 9% of all girls in U.K. independent schools. All our schools are non-denominational.

2.2 The core aim of the GDST is to provide a broad-based, high-quality education to girls of intellectual promise. The GDST is committed to delivering a well-rounded education, and educating its pupils to be confident, caring people in whom individuality of thought is teamed with social responsibility. We believe that this in itself contributes to the broader public benefit.

3.1 In 1944, the GDST joined the Government's Direct Grant Scheme. When this was discontinued in 1976, GDST schools reverted to full independence. From 1981, the GDST was the largest participant in the Government's Assisted Places Scheme. When this was phased out (from 1998), the GDST set up its own bursary scheme to ensure that GDST schools remain accessible to talented girls, so far as possible irrespective of the family's financial circumstances.

3.2 The GDST continues to make a substantial investment in its bursary scheme to ensure access is as broad as possible. Currently some 16% of our senior school pupils receive some level of financial assistance, although the scale of this will, inevitably, vary from school to school. We do not offer staff or sibling discounts on fees. Entry to our schools is based solely on academic ability and potential.

3.3 We also operate an Open Access Scheme at the Belvedere School in Liverpool, which is jointly funded with the Sutton Trust. Entry to the Belvedere School through the benefit of the Scheme is entirely on the basis of performance in the selection procedure, regardless of ability to pay. The success of the Scheme in pupil terms has really opened up life chances for the cohorts of young people already in place

3.4 In addition, we work closely with national and international sponsors, for example HSBC, which offers means-tested scholarships to some of our most able students.

4 The GDST welcomes opportunities for partnership with all sectors of the community, and is also keen to disseminate and share best practice. Every GDST school is engaged in a range of activities which provide tangible benefit to the school's local community. In some cases, schools are inhibited from offering greater access to their facilities because of conditions attached to relevant planning permissions (such as restrictions on hours of use and numbers of users). Nevertheless, the GDST and its schools continue to develop existing arrangements and explore further opportunities for sharing their facilities and experience, for example by way of master classes, summer schools and mentoring arrangements.

5. The GDST agrees with ISC's submission that a statutory definition of public benefit would be potentially too restrictive, preventing charities from developing and responding to changing needs and circumstances. The continuing development of existing case law would provide a more flexible means by which the Charity Commission could fulfil its role of monitoring the public benefit afforded by all charities.

Barbara Harrison

18/6/04






 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 19 July 2004