Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


DDB 29 Spinal Injuries Association

Spinal Injuries Association (SIA) comments on the

Draft Disability Discrimination Bill

SIA welcomes the additions and amendments contained in the draft Disability Discrimination Bill. The draft Bill demonstrates a commitment by the Government and the measures outlined are positive and significant steps towards combating the acts of discrimination experienced by disabled people. However, the draft Bill falls short of what disabled people want and need.

Clause 1 - Discriminatory Job Advertisements

This is a positive step in changing the negative images often portrayed of disabled people. However, this could create opportunities to pass on the blame. If it were the duty of those accepting advertisements to be responsible for their publication complying with the legislation it would simplify matters.

Clause 2 - Group Insurance

This is a welcome move in providing greater equality in regard to employee's benefits to now include such insurances as medical expenses insurance.

Clause 3 - Transport

SIA welcomes the framework which will allow regulations to bring into Part 3 of the DDA all different modes of transport, including taxis, private hire vehicles, trams, private rental or car hire, buses and trains. However, the outcome of this will depend on the content of the regulations. Therefore, we need to know these before we can congratulate the Government on a job well done. When will the Government let us know about their plans? We understand that this is a complex area but we are enthusiastic to know the end date for transport services and to see the measures introduced for setting an end date for rail vehicle accessibility.

Clause 4 & 8 - Public Authorities

SIA congratulates the Government on the introduction of the disability equality duty to be placed upon public authorities requiring them to eliminate discrimination and harassment as defined under the Act. In the past the only means of challenging discrimination has been through individual disabled people taking legal action. This clause begins to recognise what disabled people have sought from legislation for a long time - the problem is the act of discrimination not disability itself.

This is a step in the right direction - but will it lead to a 'Right to Independent Living'? Disabled people need assurance that they will be able to access their basic requirements to live independently and to participate fully in the community in which they live. These needs include: fully accessible housing; appropriate education; advocacy; employment; support to live independently; information; and financial support that meets the real costs of living as a disabled person. Hopes for such are dashed in this draft Bill as 'reasonableness' will be determined after consideration is given to costs and resources. The Bill allows for discriminatory conduct to be justified if in the opinion of the public authority (when it is reasonable for such an opinion to be held) the action of treating a disabled person equally favourably would involve extra costs that would be too great when considered against available resources. The Disability Rights Commission questioned the appropriateness of a 'reasonable opinion standard' in cases of discrimination and highlighted this in their 2003 document 'Disability Equality: Making it Happen'. Problems occur when those judging what is reasonable do so based on wrongly held perceptions of disabled people. Surely there should be no room in anti-discrimination legislation for justification of discrimination when it comes to public services? It should be possible to achieve the legitimate aims of the public bodies without discrimination against disabled people.

Clause 5 - Private Clubs

It is good to see that clubs with a membership of 25 or more will be covered by the Act. Discrimination will be prohibited in the way in which membership is given or benefits afforded but problems will still arise in private clubs as the Disability Discrimination Act only applies to services to the general public.

Clause 6 - Rented Premises

This will give protection to a great many disabled people living in private rented accommodation who hitherto had limited rights. SIA feels strongly that landlords should not be allowed to withhold consent from a disabled person who asks to make reasonable physical changes to the property they let if the landlord is not being asked to meet these costs. Newly spinal cord injured people do find themselves homeless as they are unable to return home after discharge from hospital because their landlord does not allow alterations to be made.

We welcome the duty placed upon those managing or disposing of premises to make reasonable adjustments to their policies, procedures and practices and the right of a disabled person to have an assistance pet live with them in rented accommodation.

Clause 12 - Definition

SIA supports the call by other organisations representing disabled people to extend the definition to be inclusive of all people facing discrimination as a result of their disability - in particular those representing users and survivors of mental health services and people with learning difficulties.

It is wrong to provide for future regulation that defines which cancers are to be included and which will not.

Conclusion

Nine years on from the introduction of the Disability Discrimination Act (1995), disabled people will still continue to face discrimination. Once the Bill has been enacted the Government will have met its 2001 Manifesto commitment - but we still have a long way to go. 70% of the recommendations, supported by the Government, in the Disability Rights Task Force's - 'Towards Inclusion' will have been implemented but what about the remaining 30%?

The draft Bill falls short of the 'Disabled People's Rights and Freedom Charter' put forward by the disability movement. There needs to be a greater emphasise on the dignity of a disabled person in particular with regard to 'moving and handling' and 'health and safety' issues. The Disability Rights Commission needs to be given powers to take cases under the Human Rights Act to support disabled people in their right to life and protection from degrading and inhuman treatment.




Paul Smith

SIA Executive Directo


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 April 2004