Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


DDB 13 CONFEDERATION OF PASSENGER TRANSPORT UK

MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE FOR THE PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE DRAFT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION BILL

CONFEDERATION OF PASSENGER TRANSPORT UK

CPT is the trade organisation representing the bus, coach and light rail industries in the UK. Our members range from large PLCs to single entrepreneurs. They engage in the local public transport, group hire, long distance regular service and holiday markets. In addition, our members transport over a million schoolchildren under contract to local authorities.

Our evidence falls into two distinct areas; we make some general remarks on the approach of the Draft Bill and attempt to assess its effect on the different market sectors our members serve.

Our evidence relates entirely to Clause 3 of the Draft Bill.

THE APPROACH OF THE BILL

The bus, coach and light rail industries support the principle of giving disabled people the same general rights that enjoyed when they use other services. However, we believe that it is important that the Government's powers to make Regulations and to issue guidance are used to help disabled people to understand what they can reasonably expect from transport providers and to delimit providers' duties so that meeting the needs of disabled people remains compatible with business success.

The 1995 Act, with the changes foreseen in the Draft Bill, gives a workable framework, we believe. We support the distinction in the Draft Bill between adjustments to vehicles and adjustments to service delivery in the broader sense. We note that the Bill gives the Government total discretion over the extent of special rules for vehicles and the timing of their replacement by general duties. The future balance between specific and general duties will be a matter for major debate. However, we do not propose to rehearse these arguments now.

The exclusion in new section 21ZA(1) may not give operators as much protection as intended, for reasons we explain below in our comments on the affect of the Draft Bill on the coach holiday market.

ASPECTS COMMON TO ALL MARKET SECTORS

Buses, coaches and light rail systems enable people to move around in a way which is relatively sustainable and which causes minimal congestion. Many of our users can choose to make the journey by other means. Most of the alternatives to our industry (walking, cycling, going by car) have a high "self-service" element. Walkers, cyclists, car drivers and car passengers do not have to bear the cost of making adaptations for the needs of disabled people. Although the provisions of the Draft Bill should not, in themselves, create major new costs for the industry, there is a risk that actions by the Government in the framework that the Draft Bill establishes will not only bring new costs, but cause our industry's services to be delivered in a way that makes them less attractive for some users.

The reasonableness of any adjustment will partly depend on the amount of notice that the operator is given. For example, it is easier to cater for specific dietary requirements on a coach holiday if the people concerned make them known in advance. Agreed guidance and codes of practice would be helpful in this area.

THE IMPACT ON SPECIFIC MARKET SECTORS

Local public transport

This section of the industry recognises the need for disability awareness as part of the core skills of its customer-facing staff. We do not anticipate that our customer-handling practices will need to change significantly as a result of the measures in the Draft Bill.

We are concerned that a particular assumption of the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) that accompanies the Draft Bill may not be consistent with the wording of the 1995 Act, as amended by the Draft Bill. An almost universal feature of local public transport is that transport is offered between fixed stops. We are concerned that a request from a person with a visual impairment to be collected from their home, taken to the bus or tram stop, accompanied on their journey and taken on to their ultimate destination might be seen as a reasonable adjustment (albeit and expensive one) rather than a fundamental change in the nature of the service provided. We are also conscious that for many people, disability takes the form of a mental impairment which makes it difficult for them to use public transport alone. The RIA makes no allowance for these kinds of additional cost, so we would hope to see guidance that clarifies that operators have no new duties to provide service other than between normal stops.

Similarly, no allowance has been made for the costs of introducing auxiliary aids for disabled people using public transport services.

Our members are concerned that they may have to take on the task for giving information on the presence of public facilities, such as toilets, which travellers may need to use in conjunction with a public transport journey, and be held responsible for the accuracy of this information.

Long distance coach services

On these services, a higher proportion of passengers tend to be in unfamiliar surroundings. A requirement to provide personal assistance to disabled people at interchanges and refreshment stops could amount to a significant new burden. Once again, the RIA is silent on this aspect. We do not believe that it is ever reasonable for transport operators to provide toilet assistance to disabled people. Anybody who needs this help will continue to need to bring a carer.

Group hire

Given that aspects relating to vehicles are being dealt with separately, for the time being, the industry has no particular difficulty with the Draft Bill's likely effects in the area.

Coach holidays

Appealing particularly to older people, the coach holiday industry already takes significant steps to meet the needs of disabled people, despite the absence of formal duties under the 1995 Act. It is in this sector, we believe, that there is the greatest need for a shared understanding of the adjustments that the industry should make in future.

We would like to cite some hypothetical examples of requests from disabled people:-

"I am being brought to the departure point by my son but I cannot carry my own case. I will need assistance whenever I have to move the case."

"I have a case which I cannot carry. Please arrange to collect it from my home and deliver it back after the holiday."

"I need assistance at meal times."

"I may need to call on assistance at any time of the day or night."

"I would like a sign language interpreter on the tour to relay the commentary and instructions that the coach driver is giving."

"I would like to bring a powered "scooter" on the holiday. I recognise that your staff will need special expertise in handling it and it will take two people to load and unload it."

"I would like to bring a carer with me, without paying for her coach seat, food or accommodation."

Each of these requests can be met by adjusting the service that the coach holiday operator is providing. Some of the adjustments, however, are very costly. It is far from clear, at the moment, where the boundary of reasonableness will lie. Is it reasonable for a large and profitable firm to make adjustments while a struggling family business need not do so?

There is also an industry custom, enshrined in legislation, that holiday companies must accept responsibility for the whole package that they sell. Our members are concerned that they will face significant claims from customers with allegations of discriminatory acts or practices by hotels, visitor attractions and motorway service areas.

The wording of the Draft Bill would absolve and operator from the requirement to provide a coach capable of carrying a passenger in a wheelchair (for as long as the Government sees fit) but not from the requirement to provide a trailer or a separate van capable of carrying a passenger's motorised scooter. This anomaly could be addressed by amending the proposed new section 21ZA(4) as follows:-

  "vehicle" means a vehicle for transporting people by land, air or water, and includes (in particular)-

    (a) a vehicle not having wheels

  (b) a vehicle constructed or adapted to carry passengers on a system using a mode of guided transport

    (c) a trailer attached to such a vehicle and

  (d) a goods vehicle provided in conjunction with such a vehicle



CPT UK

18 February 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 April 2004