Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


DDB 68 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

Submission by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill to the Joint Committee

Overview

1. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham welcomes the Government's publication of the draft Disability Discrimination Bill. The Authority takes a proactive approach to equalities and has lobbied for many of the proposals contained within the Bill. The authority strongly backs the proposals to bring elected members and most council functions within the scope of the Disability Discrimination Act.

2. Hammersmith and Fulham welcomes the introduction of a duty to be placed upon local authorities to actively promote equality for disabled people. However, it believes that a similar duty should also be introduced in respect of other discriminated sections of society including women, and this would be best achieved through a single equalities bill.

3. However, this Authority fears that Government's current piecemeal approach in introducing equalities legislation could lead to additional complexity and confusion for those who are committed to implementing the spirit of the law. It is also in danger of creating resentment due to a perceived imbalance between how the law impacts upon different discriminated against sections of society.

4. The Authority is concerned to ensure that any specific duties placed upon authorities are consistent with and support the other equalities requirements that councils, such as Hammersmith and Fulham, are trying to implement in practice, such as equality impact assessments.

5. The Authority notes the common approach between this draft Bill and the provisions within the Race Relations (Amendment) Act. The specific duty to produce a Race Equality Scheme undoubtedly has had a positive impact in raising the profile and mainstreaming race equality within the public sector organisations. We believe, however, it would be an error to just replicate this in respect of disabilities and instead propose that the implementation of the Disability Discrimination Bill should be progressed through a generic equality plan that encompasses the Race Equality Scheme and forms part of the Generic Equality Standard.

6. We would also argue that a single equalities bill would pave the way for the introduction of a single equalities commission and would address current concerns expressed by different sections of the community that such a body might result in their rights being eroded and interests marginalised.

The scope of the Bill

The Borough has called for and strongly welcomes the proposals to bring elected members within the scope of the Disability Discrimination Act. However, we believe that the scope should be extended further to cover:

a) all elected or appointed politicians, at national as well as local level

b) all representatives on governing bodies of public sector organisations, such as school governors and PCT governance arrangements

c) to include the enabling power to cover volunteers, as per the recommendations of the Disability Rights Task Force's recommendations

We would also recommend that the Bill be amended

a) to cover all examining bodies and standard setting agencies;

b) to provide greater clarity in the operation of the definition of disability.

One of the omissions from the Bill is that it fails to tackle the problems that people with mental health problems face in enforcing the DDA. And whilst the Authority welcomes the widening of the meaning of disability in Clause 12 of the draft Bill, we recommend it is amended further to ensure anyone who has a progressive condition is deemed to be covered.

- END -



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 April 2004