Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 460 - 463)

TUESDAY 23 MARCH 2004

MR COLIN WILLMAN AND MR STEPHEN ALAMBRITIS

  Q460  Lord Swinfen: I would like to ask about the financial implications of the draft Bill, at the moment, in particular to transport. How difficult do you think it will be for small businesses in the transport industry to fund the additional disability awareness training that will be required?

  Mr Willman: It will be extremely difficult because many of the transport companies are struggling. Taxi companies, for instance, are having to pay a lot more for their taxis to make them wheelchair friendly. They are also losing customers to private hire because people with mobility problems find wheelchair-accessible taxis difficult to get into. So they have got a reduction in income and an increase in costs. So it would be best, wherever possible, to make the access more available for the disability awareness training to the smaller market. So it is discriminating in favour of the small businesses to make sure that people do get the—

  Q461  Lord Swinfen: Are you satisfied that that training is available at the moment and being properly provided?

  Mr Willman: I am satisfied it is, in the area in which I operate, yes, which is the South East of England.

  Q462  Chairman: Who should pay for the training, do you think?

  Mr Alambritis: We have a point about seeing whether the Government can part-fund some of the training. I think this is one area where the Government can look to part-fund with real belief in the area they are part-funding, and that is to ensure access, mobility for disabled people whilst recognising some of the problems of the taxi industry and the private hire industry itself. I think it sends the right message to our cabbies that the Government is eventually coming to their help because they are always grumbling!

  Q463  Chairman: In your evidence, paragraph 9, you said you have no objection to extending the DDA to volunteers. With the employment rules of the DDA, could they simply be extended to cover volunteers or would they need adjustment to take into account any special circumstances?

  Mr Alambritis: The FSB is a volunteer organisation itself, and therefore we looked at this long and hard. In fact, if you look at employment tribunal cases the term "worker" includes volunteers. So a volunteer to the RSPCA, or to the FSB or to the another voluntary organisation, they are volunteers, they are branch treasurers, branch chairman—whatever—within the volunteer organisation and they come under the definition of "worker". So there is experience. So we have no objection to extending this, because volunteerism is very important to the UK.

  Chairman: That was the last question. We have a division in the Lords, so could I thank you for attending? There will be a transcript on the website, if you would like to look at it. Anything else that you wish to send in to us we will be happy to receive. If you would like to look back at the transcripts of the other evidence and see if there is anything in that that you would like to comment on, you can do so. Thank you very much indeed for coming.

The Committee suspended for a division.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 May 2004