Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Macmillan Cancer Relief (DDB 55)

DRAFT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION BILL AND PEOPLE LIVING WITH CANCER

  I am writing to register Macmillan Cancer Relief's interest in the draft Disability Discrimination Bill and particularly how Section 12, concerning the meaning of "disability", could affect people living with cancer.

  1.1  Macmillan welcomes the draft Bill and the proposed changes to the definition, which we feel are long overdue and increasingly urgent. While the combination of demographics and advances in treatment mean more people are living longer with cancer, sadly the current law means that more people are therefore also experiencing discrimination as a result of a cancer diagnosis.

  1.2  Macmillan believes a cancer diagnosis should not mean a life sentence of discrimination either in employment or other areas relating to the provision of goods and services. The Disability Rights Commission has already covered discrimination in the employment area in its own submission. However, another area of particular concern is the denial of access to financial products.

  1.3  Denial of access to financial products, such as travel insurance, is a source of great concern to many callers to the Macmillan CancerLine. The discrimination can be experienced regardless of whether a person's treatment has been successful and they have been given the "all clear".

  1.4  For example, one of our Managers at a Macmillan Information Centre recently conducted a survey of travel insurance companies supposedly willing to provide cover to people living with cancer. She actually rang them herself and was appalled by the service she was offered. In addition to being quoted exorbitant premiums, she found them reluctant to give information, with some companies being prepared to speak only to the individual living with cancer. One company insisted on asking if the person had been given a date to die.

  1.5  It is important to remember that as more and more people are recovering from cancer and returning to work, the consequences of this discrimination extend far beyond leisure activity and holidays. People living with cancer going on business trips or visiting a relative abroad (a regular occurrence for some members of the UK's Black and Ethnic Minority communities) are also directly affected by such discrimination.

  1.6  The consequences of a cancer diagnosis are therefore significant and permanent. That is why Macmillan believes sub-paragraph (3) of Section 12 of the draft Bill, which refers to the "consequences for a person of his having it [cancer]", should be the determinant, and not whether a specific variant of the disease is or is not included in regulations.

  1.7  Macmillan would argue that in effect this would make sub-paragraph (2) unnecessary, and it should therefore be removed. However, in the event of its retention, we would agree with the Disability Rights Commission that "this power to regulate to restrict the protection offered to people with certain forms of cancer should not be invoked unless there is clear evidence that protecting everyone who has (or has had) cancer from discrimination on this basis is proving problematic".

  Macmillan hopes very much that the Joint Committee will support its recommendations.

February 2004




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 May 2004