Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Arthritis Care (DDB 70)

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  Arthritis Care warmly welcomes the draft Disability Discrimination Bill, and believes it to be another significant step forward for disabled people. Overall the Bill for many people with arthritis will be another step to removing the barriers that many of them face in their day-to-day lives. Arthritis Care welcomes the opportunity to comment of the draft Disability Discrimination Bill

  1.2  Arthritis Care is the leading membership organisation working with people with arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Care has 70,000 supporters and has a network of over 7,000 volunteers, all of whom live with, or are affected by arthritis. It works with and for all people with arthritis from every section of the community by delivering campaigning, information, training and support services to help those living with arthritis manage their condition.

  1.3  Arthritis affects one in five people in the UK[42] and is the leading cause of physical disability[43]. Arthritis affects people of all ages[44]. There are 12,000 children in the UK with arthritis and approximately 27,000 people living with arthritis are under the age of 25[45]. One in five GP visits involves the symptoms of arthritis[46]. The main symptoms of arthritis include pain, stiffness, physical impairment, joint deformity, fatigue and impaired mobility.

  1.4  There are more than 200 types of arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions[47]. The two most common are osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [48]. The total cost of arthritis to health and social services in the UK is estimated as £5.5 billion[49]. Arthritis and related conditions are the second most common cause of days off work in both men and women[50]. In 1999-2000, 206 million working days were lost in the UK because of arthritis and related conditions—at a cost to the economy of over £18,114 billion[51].

2.  DEFINITION OF DISABILITY

  2.1  The addition of MS to the definition of disability raises some fundamental issues about naming specific impairments on the face of the act. Whilst Arthritis Care does not want to take away from the needs of people with MS, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a similar disease profile. Rheumatoid arthritis is a severe, disabling condition that shortens life expectancy by six to 10 years on average; an equivalent figure that is attributed to coronary artery disease, diabetes, stroke and Hodgkin's disease[52]. 80% of people with RA become moderately to severely disabled within 20 years of diagnosis[53], with 790 deaths in the UK were attributed to RA[54]. Arthritis Care would like to see the draft Bill broaden the definition not only to include rheumatoid arthritis but to all progressive conditions from the point of diagnosis.

3.  PREMISES

  3.1  For many people with arthritis living environmental needs change. Given the fluctuating nature of the condition auxiliary aids and services is essential. Arthritis Care welcomes the provision in the draft Bill that requires landlords to make reasonable adjustments to policies, procedures and practices to accommodate this.

  3.2  Arthritis Care however feels that the draft Bill should be bolder in ensuring disabled people have a right to auxiliary aids and services to ensure equality.

4.  TRANSPORT

  4.1  Arthritis Care has always been concerned that Section III of the DDA did not cover transport, under current legislation a bus driver can refuse to let anyone onto the bus if he/she felt they were taking too long due to their impairment. Arthritis Care welcomes the move by the draft Bill to ensure that this should not happen in the future by moving the current exemption of transport services to section 21, with a more precise exclusion of the use of transport services.

  4.2  Arthritis Care also welcomes the draft Bill's removal of the blanket exclusion in that it now can extend regulations to cover different modes of transport, including car hire, trams, vehicle breakdown operations and private rental.

  4.3  Arthritis Care would welcome an end date of 2017 for the compliance with Rail Vehicle Access Regulations, which would bring rail services into line with the bus industry. Arthritis Care would see this as a big step forward in ensuring a seamless service for disabled people when travelling. Arthritis Care does recognise that some companies will be updating rolling stock that would improve accessibility but not meet the full requirements of the draft Bill. However, they may wish to delay upgrading the rolling ahead of the 2017 deadline as they may see interim improvements as a waste of resources. This could be overcome by having very specific criteria for exemptions to meeting the 2017 deadline, that would accommodate interim improvements of rolling stock.

  4.4  Arthritis Care is disappointed that the Government has not seized the opportunity of the draft Bill to make changes to The Blue Badge Scheme introduced by the Disabled Persons' Parking Badge Scheme, 1971. The Disabled Persons' Transport Advisory Committee (DPTAC) in 2001 responded to a review of the scheme, by recommending that it be extended to children under two years of age with particular medical needs and creating powers of inspection by the police and parking attendants to ensure enforcement. Arthritis Care would strongly support these recommendations.

5.  PUBLIC SECTOR DUTY

  5.1  Arthritis Care warmly welcomes the proposal in the draft Bill to extend the DDA making it unlawful for public bodies to discriminate against disabled people when carrying out their functions.

  5.2  Arthritis Care is concerned that under Clause 21D (4) (c) another unnecessary step has been added in limiting services due to costs when there are already a number of mechanisms in place to ensure this happens now.

  5.3  Arthritis Care would be seeking some clarification as to what the draft Bill refers to when it states Public Authority.

6.  PUBLIC FUNCTIONS

  6.1  Arthritis Care welcomes the duty for public authorities to exercise their functions without prejudice. However Arthritis Care is concerned that the threshold for reasonable adjustments is very high which could lead to wide areas of discrimination.

7.  CODES OF PRACTICE

  7.1  Arthritis Care welcomes the draft Bill's proposal for the Disability Rights Commission to prepare and issue codes of good practice. It would urge the Commission to develop the codes and good practice in close consultation with disabled people.

8.  CONCLUSION

  8.1  Arthritis Care warmly welcomes the introduction of the draft Bill and the benefits for disabled people that it will bring. Arthritis Care welcomes the draft Bill's range of methods it has introduced to ensure that disabled people have better access to transport. Other aspects we welcome include provision in the draft Bill that requires landlords to make reasonable adjustments to policies, procedures and practices to accommodate this and the provision of public bodies to carry out their functions without discriminating against disabled people.

  8.2  Arthritis Care has some concerns related to the definition of disability, for example the exclusion of rheumatoid arthritis. Other issues include missing the opportunity to add further strength to the Blue Badge Scheme, and setting a date for the rail sector to bring them in line with the bus industry.

  8.3  To ensure inclusion people with arthritis need access to services that ensure their independence for as long as possible. There are too many barriers which prevent disabled people from living on equal terms, Society has a duty to remove these barriers to ensure inclusion. The benefits to society in ensuring inclusion is that people normally excluded can make a positive contribution, for example remaining at work.

February 2004



42   McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity statistics from general practice. 4th national study 1991-92. London, HMSO (1995). Back

43   Disability Living Allowance, Attendance Allowance and Invalid Care Allowance-Disability Care and Mobility Quarterly Statistical Enquiry. Department of Work and Pensions 2002. Back

44   McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity statistics from general practice. 4th national study 1991-92. London, HMSO (1995). Back

45   Disability Living Allowance, Attendance Allowance and Invalid Care Allowance-Disability Care and Mobility Quarterly Statistical Enquiry. Department of Work and Pensions. 2002. Back

46   Royal College of General Practitioners (1996) OPCS Department of Health and Social Security. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice. Fourth National Survey 1991-92. HMSO. Back

47   Information for People with Arthritis. Arthritis Care. 2002. Back

48   Information for People with Arthritis. Arthritis Care. 2002. Back

49   Arthritis: The Big Picture. Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) 2002. Back

50   Arthritis: The Big Picture. Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) 2002. Back

51   Arthritis: The Big Picture. Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) 2002. Back

52   Scott D, Shipley M, Dawson et al, The Clinical Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: Strategies for Improving Clinical Effectiveness, British Journal of Rheumatology; 37:546-554. Back

53   Barrett,EM, Scott DGI, Wiles NJ & Symmons DPM, The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on employment status in the early years of disease: a UK community-based study; Rhuematology, 2000; 39:1403-09. Back

54   Arthritis: The Big Picture. Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) 2002. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 May 2004