Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill Written Evidence


Further memorandum from Leonard Cheshire (DDB 120)

  I am writing to you following the submission of Leonard Cheshire's written evidence to the Joint Committee in February of this year. Our evidence built upon the recent research we have carried out on Inaccessible transport in particular the rail network and end dates.

  We welcome the opportunity for decisive action on the end date for rail vehicles to be accessible. It is our firm belief that 2017, the same year that buses have to comply with PSVAR (Public Service Vehicles Accessibility Regulations), should be considered as he last acceptable date. 2017 will allow disabled people to make whole journeys involving both systems.

  We welcome the position taken by the House of Commons Transport Committee in their recent report "Disabled people's access to transport" (HC 439). The Committee, who in addition to the DfT, took evidence from Leonard Cheshire, the Disability Rights Commission and the Disabled People's Transport Advisory Committee, recommended:

    "The rail system should be made accessible as soon as practicable; it is not acceptable for disabled to have to wait for 20 or 30 years for this to happen. We recommend that our colleagues on the Joint Committee ask Ministers about the relationship between their consultation on an end date for rail accessibility and the SRA[73]s' own policy"

    Disabled People's Access to Transport, p16.

  Whilst we anticipate this is an issue the Joint Committee may wish to raise with the Transport Minister at your evidence session on 31 March 2004, we would hope that the committee may also wish to invite the Strategic Rail Authority for their comments on the matters raised by the Transport Committee.

  However, Leonard Cheshire remains concerned about the skeletal nature of this bill in that much of its regulatory powers are currently unseen. We welcome the agreement by Maria Eagle MP at the All Party Disability Group on 20 January this year to distribute a memorandum detailing the Government's intentions regarding these regulations to committee members. We hope that you have now received this and found it helpful in your deliberations. You may wish to invite the Transport Minister to provide a similar memorandum on the DfT's thinking regarding the end dates consultation for rail vehicles when you meet him on Wednesday. Both these documents may help to allay some of Leonard Cheshire's concerns about the use of regulatory powers and would of course, be extremely helpful for your important work.

  We remain confident that the Joint Committee will address the important issue of accessible transport comprehensively. Accessible transport is an essential precursor to the wider benefits of the disability civil rights agenda, the Disability Discrimination Bill provides a unique opportunity to address the continuing liabilities in the DDA caused by inaccessible transport. Not to do so would be an opportunity missed and would deliver flawed legislation.

March 2004



73   Strategic Rail Authority's Rolling Stock Strategy, December 2003, 4.18. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 May 2004