Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum from the Local Government Association (DGB 176)

INTRODUCTION

  Further to the oral evidence session attended by the Local Government Association (LGA) on 29 January 2004, the LGA is pleased to provide the further information requested at that time.

  The LGA was asked for its view on the existing and proposed land use planning powers in relation to casinos and gambling establishments.

  In relation to current powers, PPG6 suggests that these uses should be located in sequentially preferable locations beginning with town and district centres before moving on to edge of centre sites and then out of centre sites, and that facilities should be located in centres which serve the same catchment area as the uses proposed. This is reiterated in the consultation draft of PPS6.

  However, the Joint Ministerial Statement of 7 August 2003 makes it clear that it is envisaged that the market will determine the number, size and character of casinos and their location and that the Government considers this type of development likely to present major opportunities for regeneration and tourism which could have a significant effect on the economy of the area. In addition, the Ministerial Statement is clear that the government does not want to see a proliferation of smaller scale casinos in the High Street, which under current policy requirements would be the first priority for this type of development.

  "The Government is keen to secure these benefits where they can make the greatest contribution to its objective of encouraging economic development and creating sustainable communities." (Paragraph 14 Joint Ministerial Statement August 2003).

  In effect this is an acknowledgement that casino development of the scale envisaged is unprecedented in this country and therefore has not been tested through the current statutory planning process. It also gives the regeneration benefits of such developments a pre-eminence that current planning policy does not reflect. It appears clear that the Government has recognised that this new type of development requires a different policy response.

  What this means in practice is not yet clear. Currently casinos tend to be discreet operations, often aimed at wealthy customers. Because of their small size and the way they are run, they generally have little effect on the amenity of neighbourhoods and on conditions in streets nearby.

  The proposals in the draft Gambling Bill abolish area restrictions, remove the requirement for membership and allow high prize money gambling machines in casinos and in bingo halls. They introduce the possibility that there will be large casino type facilities catering for a mass market. This widening of the customer base and the possibility of gambling effectively subsidising the entertainment offer and more critically the sale of alcohol, makes it more likely that issues of nuisance will arise in relation to gambling premises.

  Casinos have traditionally operated late into the night; frequently until dawn. It is assumed that these hours will continue and other new casinos would have similarly late hours. Depending on their location, it is possible that new casinos, particularly the larger ones, will impact negatively on neighbourhood amenity and town centres. Notwithstanding proposed changes in planning law, the LGA believes that a new licensing objective of [odq]the prevention of public nuisance[cdq] should be added to Clause 1 of the draft Bill.

  At present it is not clear how many existing casinos will change to the new format and how many new larger casinos there will be, although it is clear that there are major businesses who intend to take advantage of the proposed arrangements. Should casinos remain in the same Use Class as community uses such as cinemas and sports facilities, some member authorities have expressed concern that operators will target such premises which could be changed to a more profitable gambling use without the need for planning permission.

  The draft Guidance to be issued under Section 182 of Licensing Act 2003 makes it clear that special saturation policy areas can be a feature of local alcohol and entertainment licensing policies to be drawn up under this Act. LGA recognises the synergy between the planning and licensing systems, and it is very important that through either the proposed planning or gambling regimes that the issue of saturation of alcohol, entertainment and similar premises can be taken into account when considering new gambling premises licences.

ISSUES SPECIFIC TO WALES

  None identified at this time.

March 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 7 April 2004