The social aspect
456. The proposal to allow bingo to be played in
casinos is considered by some to pose a risk to the social aspect
of bingo which is at the heart of many clubs.[681]
Sir Peter Fry, of the Bingo Association, told the Committee, "two-thirds
of our customers are women. They can go to a bingo club. It is
comfortable; it is warm; they see their friends and it is comparatively
cheap. I do worry that the reduction in the number of stand alone
bingo clubs could have an adverse public effect".[682]
Bingo clubs, he argued, are also popular venues for the elderly
and can provide a positive social benefit: "For some people,
it is the only place they go to apart perhaps from the supermarket.
That is their main activity".[683]
457. Some parts of the bingo industry have however
welcomed the proposal, seeing it as an opportunity for them to
convert their premises to a casino, apply for a casino operating
licence and widen the gambling products that they can offer.[684]
Gala "stress the fundamental strength and resilience of Bingo"
and "do not believe that the social element of the bingo
experience will be lost and it is unlikely that there will be
a mass conversion of Bingo sites to Casinos".[685]
The potential for bingo clubs to convert their premises raises
the risk of a proliferation of small casinos.
458. The Committee has reservations about the
potential consequences of all casinos being able to offer bingo.
We acknowledge that some of these concerns could be addressed
under Clause 125 (1) of the draft Bill, which would require existing
bingo clubs intending to operate as casinos to obtain a new premises
licence. As we discuss in paragraph 417, we consider that the
guidance issued by the Gambling Commission to local authorities
under Clause 17 should clarify that local authorities should be
able to take account of potential problem gambling implications
of such conversions and the accompanying risks of merging soft
and hard forms of gambling when deciding whether or not to grant
a casino premises licence.
459. Under Clause 143 of the draft Bill casino
premises would be entitled to offer bingo. We consider that bingo
should be ancillary to the casino's core and traditional gaming
activities. We would not, therefore have concerns about large
or resort casinos offering bingo. However, we consider that Clause
143 should be amended to enable local authorities to prevent small
casinos offering bingo. We would expect this discretion to be
exercised in accordance with strict guidance issued by the Gambling
Commission pursuant to Clause 17, which should take account of
the proximity of existing bingo clubs.
Bingo in pubs and clubs
460. The proposed rules applying to offering bingo
in pubs and clubs represents a significant change from the current
law. Pubs and clubs will have to apply to the Gambling Commission
for an 'additional bingo licence' if they have had any period
of seven days in which either stakes or prizes have totalled £1,000
or more. The Committee received evidence suggesting that the proposed
£1,000 limit was too low.
461. The Committee of Registered Clubs' Associations
(CORCA) told the Committee that "the need for an additional
bingo licence would be a further bureaucratic burden on private
clubs involving, as it must, an extra cost [
] the proposed
threshold of £1,000 a week is derisory in comparison with
the stake and prize levels typically involved in commercial bingo".[686]
The Bingo Association has told the Committee that its members
would have no objection to an increase in the limit to £2,000
"if this was properly regulated and enforced".[687]
462. The Committee recommends that pubs and clubs
should have to apply to the Gambling Commission for an additional
bingo licence if in any period of seven days stakes or prizes
have totalled £2,000 or more. Clause 238 of the draft Bill
should be amended accordingly.
671 DCMS, Gambling Review Body Report, Cm. 5206, July
2001 Back
672
DCMS, Draft Gambling Bill: Policy document, Cm. 6014 - IV, November
2003. Back
673
Ev 609 Back
674
Q 542 Back
675
Ev 189, para 13 Back
676
Q 550 [Sir Peter Fry] Back
677 Ev
694 Back
678
Q 1733 [Lord McIntosh] Back
679
Q 558 [Sir Peter Fry]. See also memorandum by Leo Leisure, Ev
706. Back
680
Ev 607, para 7 Back
681
Ev 189 Back
682
Q 550 [Sir Peter Fry]. See also memorandum by Leo Leisure (Ev
706) Back
683
Q 562 [Sir Peter Fry] Back
684
Ev 598, para 10. The Rank Group, a casino operator, argued in
evidence to us that casinos were a regulated environment, and
no problems would be caused by them offering bingo [Ev 727] Back
685
Ev 598, para 10.3 Back
686
Ev 609 Back
687
Ev 204 Back