Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Ministry of Finance, Sweden (DGB 38)

  With reference to press notice of 19 November 2003 the Swedish Ministry of Finance would hereby wish to present its written evidence to the Joint Committee for the Draft Gambling Bill on issues concerning remote gambling.

  The ministries responsible for gaming regulation in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland have been following the development of the international gaming market on the Internet and the proposals for the reformation of British gaming legislation very closely.

  Gaming in the Nordic countries has traditionally been a restricted activity only permitted pursuant to stringent legislation. The main purpose of our restrictive legislation is the need to uphold legitimate interests with regard to public policy and order as well as to limit damaging social consequences such as problem gambling and fraud. A second ground, which is not without relevance, is that betting and lotteries may make a significant contribution to the financing of benevolent or public interest activities such as social and charitable undertakings, sport or culture.

  Gambling has up to now been a terrestrial activity where countries have been able to determine their own legislation, which may differ from legislation in other countries. Remote gambling over the Internet introduces gambling as a cross border activity. We therefore consider it to be of the utmost importance that the member states of the international community address this area with an open discussion with the objective to contain and determine the conditions for the development of this form of gambling with regard to negative social consequences.

  We do acknowledge that Great Britain wishes to confront the problem of offshore based Internet operations targeting British citizens, and to contain and regulate these gaming offers within Great Britain accordingly. We are however concerned with the negative cross-border consequences such a policy may entail as no limitations to the extent and content of remote gambling outside Great Britain has been laid out in the Draft Gambling Bill. If implemented, such a policy would seriously limit the liberty of the governments and parliaments in the neighbouring countries of Great Britain to pursue an independent national gaming policy. It would also undermine the sovereignty of our and other countries to set limits to the growth of the market and force them to accept forms of gambling that are not a part of their gambling tradition.

  We also fear that a liberalised British policy on remote gambling with the clear objective to export British gambling services will lead to much stronger competition on the emerging global Internet gaming market, which at present is not subject to any international regulation at all. This market is deemed to be a dark zone for potentially dangerous criminal activities by a great majority of the member states in the international community. We have also reason to believe that such a development will lead to an uncontrolled increase in problem gaming related to remote gambling over the Internet.

  As we understand, these concerns are not unique for the Nordic countries. The European Court of Justice has also accepted these concerns as legitimate in several rulings allowing Member States of the European Union to pursue individual policies with regard to gaming legislation limiting their obligations as laid down in the EU treaty.

  Internationally, there are clear signs amongst an overwhelming and growing majority of OECD countries towards the formulation of a norm of respect committing countries not to allow gaming operators established in their territory providing games to citizens of other countries, unless special agreements exists. We believe that many countries share the view that regulation of the gaming market is primarily a concern for the state in question.

  Taking into account the widely practised policy of respect for national regulation in the international society, we ask the British parliament to take into consideration the legitimate interests of the Nordic and other countries upon its deliberation and assessment of the Draft Gambling Bill on the issue of remote gambling. As an interactive media, which is recognised to have a revolutionary long-term impact on our societies, the Internet calls for internationally coordinated actions in order to avoid any disillusionment on the part of the citizens.

  The Nordic countries have already been in contact with and held a meeting with the Department of Culture, Media and Sport regarding our concern with regard to the proposals on remote gambling. During these discussions representatives of the Nordic countries were advised to refer the matter to the Committee. A copy of our letter of 15 May 2003 is enclosed.

  Finally, it should be emphasised that the Nordic countries are ready at any time to provide the Committee with any information needed for the further clarification of our view on the matter of remote gambling. Representatives for the Nordic countries are more than willing to attend any hearing in London the Committee may wish to hold on this matter.

December 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 7 April 2004