Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Ladbrokes Worldwide (DGB 70)

  Ladbrokes Worldwide is pleased to outline a short letter to the PLS Committee. We do so with the full knowledge that the ABB has submitted a detailed paper to the Committee and without wanting to overwhelm the Committee with extra work we thought we would keep our comments to a minimum. However we would like to draw the Committee's attention to the following:

Ladbrokes Worldwide:

  As the largest betting company in the world Ladbrokes is well placed to comment on the draft Gambling Bill. Our experience in betting and gaming dates back over many years and extends from our pools business through to remote gambling. We currently have 1870 shops in the UK, and a further 116 in Ireland and 321 in Belgium. We employ approximately 12,000 people. Our remote gambling business, Ladbrokes.com is a truly global operation and includes Internet, telephone and interactive services operating in 13 languages and as many currencies. In addition, through Vernons we have a long track record in the pool betting business and up until 2000 we owned a number of high street casinos, which we sold to Gala. Our parent company, Hilton Group plc will also be making a short submission to the Committee on resort casinos.

Social Responsibility:

  At the heart of the Government's proposals is the objective of ensuring that the industry behaves with responsibility and integrity. We agree with this. Ladbrokes takes the issue of social responsibility very seriously, we are supporters of the Gambling Industry Charitable Trust and GamCare. We received on December 9 independent verification from GamCare as their first socially responsible operator. It is important that the Gambling Commission keeps under review matters of social responsibility and we think its right for the new Gambling Commission to have the powers to remove licences from those companies that are deemed not to be behaving responsibly.

Fixed Odds Betting Terminals:

  We are pleased that agreement was reached between the Government, the Gaming Board and the industry together with support from GamCare for the code of conduct that now governs FOBTs. The draft bill highlights the importance of codes of conduct and we would echo this as a model for other parts of the draft Gambling Bill.

Betting Exchanges:

  The Association of British Bookmakers (ABB) outlines in greater detail the betting industry's concerns about betting exchanges. We urge the Committee to carry out an investigation into betting exchanges. We do this not because we are opposed to exchanges per se but because it is vital that serious work is carried out to understand the different characteristics of exchanges. Principally we believe it is important to distinguish between those people that use exchanges for recreational purposes and those that use them for professional reasons. Policy must therefore follow from this premise.

Regulation:

  The new Regulator, the Gambling Commission, must try to achieve better regulation and ensure that the regulator remains flexible and able to adapt and change to market forces. With regard to licensing, the issuing of personal licensing must be proportionate and not too onerous.

Remote Gambling:

  The Government must try and find a balance between ensuring that the principles of regulation and responsibility are transferred to remote gambling from retail betting. This must be done without stifling the ability of UK operators to compete in an international market whilst also providing sensible licensing arrangements for those UK companies that operate on a number of different platforms.

  As I said we have intentionally kept our comments to a minimum and this letter should be seen as highlighting just a small number of key points in addition to the submission from the ABB. Ladbrokes would of course be delighted to give further written or oral evidence to the committee should they wish.

December 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 7 April 2004