Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill Written Evidence


Memorandum from Accor Casinos (DGB 98)

  Thank you for your letter of 11 December. Your heavy work schedule is understood and our invitation to you and your colleagues to visit some of our French casino operations still stands. We would be very pleased to show them to you and explain the functioning, whenever the occasion would permit.

  Following your suggestion, I have enclosed a document that gives an outline of the administrative and fiscal set-up of casinos in France. The document also outlines the complications of the casino licensing system in France. Whilst I would not in any way suggest that the draconian and convoluted fiscal regime under which we operate should be replicated in Britain, it does show that it is possible to turn a profit in a casino operation, even when the taxation is relatively punitive; this in spite of what some international operators have been quoted as saying.

  The downside of this high taxation is that there is a tendency by some French groups to progressively reduce their table gaming operations. It goes without saying that table gaming is very expensive to run—even given that here basic gaming wages are from tips; salary charges, taxes, etc, are still high—and, there is not a single casino group in France that could be profitable without slot machines. This is certainly the case with Accor Casinos where, in spite of the lack of table games revenue, we make a positive effort to run as many table games as possible. As an example, the casino at Enghein, near Paris, had the highest gross gaming revenue in France but, until it recently was permitted slot machines, it was not profitable at all.

  I have also enclosed an outline of the Accor Casinos responsible gaming programme that we have had in place for several years now and where we currently support directly the service provider, and who has just started to receive limited government funding—not admittedly the best method. Currently, of the six major French casino groups, only Accor Casinos has a programme of responsible gaming in place. And neither the national lottery nor the national association of bookmakers have taken steps to set up such a programme.

  The Gambling Industry Charitable Trust in Britain appears to have made an admirable effort to raise voluntarily the £3 million funding for the research and treatment of gaming abuse, as suggested in the Budd Report, but we at Accor Casinos are not convinced that voluntary funding is the answer.

  It would seem to us that the GICT will have some difficulty in raising voluntarily the sum required, that is some way from being fully achieved. Our thoughts are that this may never be realised by voluntary means and that the threat of a government levy may well come to pass. While bigger operators will probably have their own mitigating safeguards in place, they also have more to lose from adverse gaming climate change, and at the same time they will probably have deeper pockets. If the tariff is voluntary, smaller operators may be less willing to belong and participate if the tariff for them appears too expensive.

  Until all those in gaming are convinced of the need for a social responsibility programme (and our own practical experience tells us that this is not likely to be the case), then voluntarism will probably not work and a form of levy, such as we have proposed for France, may well be the best and most equitable means to raise the necessary funding.

  We would be pleased to comment further on these or other related points should you feel it pertinent.

A PROGRAMME TO PREVENT THE RISK OF EXCESSIVE GAMING

  The continued growth of the casino industry in France has inevitably led to a perception of an increase in problem gambling, raising the issue of corporate social responsibility in casino gaming. But as of yet it would be inaccurate to suggest that this concept has taken root.

  Several years ago, Accor Casinos began an internal debate about the appropriateness of developing a responsible gaming programme. A survey carried out among the operational management revealed that the majority felt it was not the business of the profession to get involved in prevention. The reactions were not surprising—it should be noted that a large part of the remuneration of casino employees is made up from tips. In fact, in France it is legally the only remuneration received by table gaming staff. Many staff made it clear that they had mixed feelings over balancing moral perception with that of profitability (for themselves and the casino).

  Staff were made aware that problem gambling, however marginal it might appear, could not and would not be ignored. The content of a prevention programme was drawn up and approved, leading eventually to the rollout of a programme in all Accor Casinos establishments beginning in the summer of 2001. Once the content of our prevention programme was drawn up and approved by the panel of Accor Casinos' management, we set up a team of volunteers drawn from all levels of the personnel of our casinos. They were trained and given assistance by professional trainers from the Académie Accor (the Accor University). The foundation team then developed a training module, which was attended, in stages, by eventually all the group's personnel in touch with the public.

  Those players with problems are offered information and assistance, without any claim made to replace the professionals and therapists in the field of addictions. To this end, there is close collaboration with social agencies and recognized specialized associations, such as the French organisation SOS Joueurs and Sedqa in Malta. All counselling is entirely voluntary.

  In practice, this means that:

    —  Our teams are able to assess the risks of excessive gambling. Each team has several members who are designated to advise clients in difficulty, based on very specific guidelines, with assessment criteria to enable them to avoid awkward situations, particularly by distinguishing the fine line between a client who plays a lot (without putting himself in danger) and a client who plays to excess.

    —  Our clients may become better informed by consulting the leaflets and brochures on excessive gambling that we make available to them in all our casinos. We can also advise them on external contacts and to direct clients who ask for this assistance towards professionals who can offer them appropriate solutions.

  Currently, of the six major French casino groups, only Accor Casinos (with its associate Groupe Barriere) has a programme of responsible gaming in place. And neither the national lottery nor the national association of bookmakers have taken steps to set up such a programme.

  We have presented our programme to the French casino operators' group, Casinos de France, who has now presented this programme to government. At present, however, this movement involves only the casino operators and even within this group, we are moving very slowly and convincing a few at a time.

  The first question to be answered was how the Trust would be funded. We have suggested that there be a levy of 1 Euro per 1000 Euros of each casino operator's net casino win (after gaming tax), which would generate roughly 1,2 million Euros based on the current year (naturally, if the lottery and the bookmakers were involved, the sums raised would be tenfold). It is anticipated that most of this money would go into direct education, treatment and support.

  Data from SOS Joueurs and other available research indicate that the major source of problem gambling in France does not stem from the strictly controlled casinos with their limited numbers of slot machines, but from the huge numbers of illegal slots in downmarket bars and the "scratch card" lottery tickets sold everywhere. This is difficult to combat when the official interest in prevention appears small.

  Has our programme worked? It is hard to say so far, as success is dependent on the will and social conscience of all the French casino operators. Given this, it may be necessary that official authority becomes involved in responsible gambling programmes. We also believe that formal codes of social responsibility should be applied and that operators should adhere to them as a condition of their licence. It is of limited use that one casino operating group may put into place a responsible gaming programme, if the "banned" player may be able simply to move to the casino down the street.

CASINOS IN FRANCE

1.   Overview:

  France, the originator of many forms of gambling and creator of roulette, led the world in the casino sector for many years. Then, in the 1960s, saddled with the highest taxes in Europe and a shrinking market of players, the French casino industry went into, what appeared to be at the time, terminal decline.

  At the same time, gambling in French society was given a boost with the spectacular rise in state-run gambling (Lotto, Tapis Vert, pan-mutual betting, etc.). This corresponded to a new trend in gambling demand, with people now wanting simpler forms of gambling, accessible to all and offering large stakes for small bets. The configuration of French casinos at this time no longer met this demand.

  In this difficult context, the authorisation of slot machines by a law passed in 1987 gave a new boost to the casino business.

  Since then, the gross proceeds generated by these machines have continued to grow. The rise in the number of slot machines, requiring large-scale investment, has also lead to a greater concentration of the operators active in this market.

  Over 100 of the existing 180 casinos belong to groups varying in size, sometimes subsidiaries of prominent investors (international companies quoted on the stock market). The five major groups operate between them 109 casinos and achieved a gross gaming revenue (in 2003) of 1,917 billion Euros, being 75,29% of the market.

  The changes brought about in the French casino market have been accompanied by the introduction of even stricter regulations than were already in place.

  Today, in spite of higher taxation (with the recent introduction of the Social Security deficit income-based tax, the C.S.G.), investors continue to show interest in the casino business.

  Over the five years until 2001, the average annual growth of the sector in France has been constantly over 10% and for the last two years around 5%.

  This development is due to:

    —  Increased attendance at the casinos;

    —  The opening of new casinos and the modernisation of the existing product;

    —  The acceptance by the public of gaming as a regular part of their leisure spend and entertainment package.

  Municipalities (cities and towns), aware of the many advantages that a casino can bring, have issued "invitations to tender" for casino licences in increasing numbers.

  There are three main advantages for a commune to have a casino on its territory:

    —  The local authority obtains increased and, importantly, direct tax revenues;

    —  A casino contributes to the economic, tourist and cultural development of the town and the region;

    —  A casino creates a significant number of local jobs.

  Licensing procedure for a new casino: An outline

  As part of the public sector, French casinos are under the control of the Ministry of the Interior and all casino licences are municipal concessions.

  The opening of casinos in seaside, health, mountain and spa resorts was regulated in 1907. The scope of the law was widened in 1988 to include those major cities of over 500,000 inhabitants and which met certain cultural demands.

  Eligible municipalities wishing to open a casino grant their concession to a private operator after requests for proposals have been submitted. On an equal footing to gaming, the operator must develop tourism and cultural oriented activities, entertainment and an appropriate food and beverage offer.

    —  A Request for Proposals for a "public service concession" (ie a casino) is opened for offers by the municipality or community that wishes to have a casino on its territory.

    —  The choice (shortlist) is made by the municipality of the preferred candidates for the concession.

    —  Specifics of the "contract" are given to the candidates.

    —  Presentation of candidates projects is made to the municipality.

    —  Negotiations are carried out between the candidates and the municipality.

    —  The choice by the municipality of the concessionaire is made for a maximum term of 18 years.

    —  The submission of the authorisation dossier by the municipality is made to the to the Sous-Préfécture (regional authority).

    —  A public enquiry is held, of which the results are attached to the dossier.

    —  The transmission of dossier is now done to the to the Préfécture (senior regional authority).

    —  After approval at this stage, transmission of the dossier to the office of "Libertés Publiques et des Affaires Juridiques" (central government, Paris).

    —  Set up of an enquiry by the sub direction "Courses et Jeux" (gaming police) into the suitability of the selected candidate.

    —  Examination of the dossier by the "Commission des Jeux" (gaming commission, essentially of the Interior Ministry).

    —  The commission gives its opinion as to the suitability of the candidate and, indeed, to the suitability of the casino for the community.

    —  The authorisation is now submitted to Minister of the Interior. If the decision is favourable, the authonsation (casino licence) is limited to a maximum of five years but can be limited to one year. The procedure for renewing an authorisation takes six to eight months.

    —  Note that if the demand is for a new casino, the building must be relatively complete before the demand for a licence may be made.

    —  The initial casino licence will be for table games operation only. It is to be noted that this restriction applies to all candidates, whether they are already casino operators or not.

    —  A demand for slot machines in the casino may only be made after 12 months of operation, with no guarantee of success and also with no assurance as to the specific number of slots that may be allowed.

2.   Administration and Functioning

  The regulations lay down very strict conditions for the administration of casinos and their gambling activities, along with specific rules and documents for the specific accounting systems of gambling establishments.

    —  Authorised casinos must have a general manager and a management committee who are personally responsible (and in the case of the general manager, Directeur Responsable, criminally responsible) for following the regulations and meeting the specifications and procedures. The manager and the members of the management committee must be approved before their appointment by the Minister of the Interior.

    —  In a partnership or public limited company, the executive director must be the manager actually running the casino, and in a joint-stock company he must be the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Managing Director and member of the Board. He is obliged to live near the casino (if not actually in the community).

    —  The appointment of the gaming personnel must be approved by the local Police Commissioner and the head of the Special Branch (Renseignements Généraux) of the district in which the casino is located.

    —  A monthly statement on the casino's operations must be sent by the fifth of each month to the Prefect of the Region (Département).

    —  At the beginning of each casino gaming year (the financial year running from 1 November to 31 October), the casino must justify having on the premises sufficient cash and bank guarantees whose sum will cover any eventual winnings. Very precise regulations control each gaming activity and codify the gaming equipment used, the functions of the pit bosses, croupiers and other gaming staff, the different steps in the running of each game, etc. . .

    —  Customers who wish to play at the gaming tables must produce their identity, before entering the gaming room and be registered on a file that may be checked by officers of the Ministry of the Interior.

    —  Customers who "buy-in" for or win over

    l,000 must be listed in a special register which may be consulted by police officers assigned to supervising the casino's activities. The legislation on the laundering of money derived from drug trafficking reinforced the obligations imposed on casinos by requiring them to register the names and addresses of gamblers who exchange tokens and chips valued at over

    l,000.

    —  No person employed in a casino can lend money to gamblers. However, the casino can make loans in the form of tokens or chips.

  These strict regulations (amongst others), the frequency of the checks made on the casino personnel by the officers of the Ministry of the Interior, and the frequent controls of the casino operations by the Gambling Police (Central Racing and Gambling Department) and the Revenue authorities, are due to the large tax revenues generated by this activity.

3.  Financial and fiscal aspects

  The establishment of a casino within a community generates new and sustainable resources in the form of financial and tax revenues. These revenues take different forms: part of them derive from the contractual payments made by the casino to the local authority and the rest come from the taxes levied on the casino's operations in the local authority area.

  The state and the local authorities collected around

l,38 billion in the 2002-03 season, the equivalent of 55% of the gross eamings of casinos (total gross earnings were

2,54 billion for this period). To these revenues must be added the local and corporate taxes.

The Municipal Tax Levy

  Casinos are economic and social partners of their municipalities

  A direct local tax is laid down in the specifications negotiated between the local authority and the casino operator with a ceiling capped at 15% of the tax base.

  Casinos make a significant contribution to the budget of their local authority through taxation, and are often the largest contributor and the positive effects on the life of the community are beneficial to its economic development.

  Apart from their direct contribution, they also have significant indirect effects on the economic life of municipalities. Their operational requirements—maintenance of premises, construction investments, organising entertainment programmes, etc—require them to call on local and regional companies for these and other services and casinos devote a large part of their profits to these investments.

  Finally, thanks to the complementarity of their activities, casinos make a significant addition to the region's tourist and cultural attractions and thus favour the economic development of its different sectors.

  Apart from the municipal tax levy that is guaranteed by contract to last a number of years, additional tax revenues are generated mainly via corporate tax.

  The investments made by the casino operator in the construction and fitting out of the land and premises, as well as the considerable work force needed for running a casino (generally local), generate additional and substantial tax revenues for a municipality. However, it is difficult to predict the annual amount that a local authority can expect to gain from the opening of a casino. Owing to the wide variations in local and regional tax rates, the constant changes made in the tax system and the possibility of tax ceilings, it is not possible to draw up a generally applicable revenue model.

  But is clear that the prospect of a long-lasting and substantial increase in the revenues of a municipality through the opening of a casino is one of the key factors in the adoption of such a project in a local authority. And it is worth pointing out that, for many small municipalities, the casino becomes its main taxpayer, sometimes contributing up to 50% of its revenue from taxation.

The State's Fixed Levy

  Based on the gross proceeds of the gambling activities, it is 0.5% for the gaming tables and 2% for slot machines.

The State's Progressive Levy

  This tax is raised every month on the cumulative amount of the tax base from the start of the fiscal year. The rates applied each month start at 10% and rise to a maximum of 80%.

  When the state's progressive levy combined with the municipality's level exceed 80% of the tax base, the state's levy is reduced to make the total of the two levies equal to 80%.

RDS—Social Security Deficit Contribution

  In February 1996 the French state introduced a new tax designed to reduce the deficit of the Social Security system, which is equal to 3% of the gross proceeds of gambling before the tax allowance is applied.

CSG—Social Security Deficit Income-Based Tax

  Since January l 1997, casinos must pay the CSG Social Security deficit income-based tax, set at 3.4% of the theoretical gross proceeds of slot machines before the tax allowance is applied (the gaming tables are not covered by the CSG).

Stamp Duty

  Every customer entering the gaming rooms must pay stamp duty of

10 per day and for each entry.

4.   Casinos create jobs in the region

  Casinos in France directly employ 13,000 staff, but a total of 30,000 jobs are concerned if one includes the jobs in the hotel, food & beverage and entertainment sectors.

  Casinos are among the leading employers in local authorities, and sometimes the biggest employer. The Divonne casino, for example, with its 450 employees, is one of the municipality's biggest employers.

5.   Casinos: Tourist Development Tools and Regional Attractions

  "A casino is an establishment involved in three distinct activities: entertainment, food & beverage, and gambling, combined under one management and always run internally by the operator's management".

  Owing to the complementarity of their activities, casinos make a significant addition to the region's tourist attractions and thus favour the economic development of its different sectors.

  Moreover, since they are linked by their specifications to the future of the municipalities in which they operate, casinos seek to create genuine tourist synergies through working closely with the local bodies involved in the economy.

  Casinos offer a wide range of leisure activities: restaurants, discotheques, shows, gaming rooms, slot machines . . . and quite often hotels, whose presence is directly related to the existence of the casino.

  As initiators of events which stimulate the life of the municipality, casinos create a permanent local attraction which boosts tourist numbers.

The advantages of collaboration between the municipality and the casino

  Each casino is bound by a specifically negotiated contract to its municipality or community. This document also enables the municipality to decide which local or regional marketing or cultural actions will benefit from the payments made by the casino.

  Hence casinos contribute, often in substantial proportions, to the development of the economic and tourist activities of municipalities.

  Furthermore, some events that gain wide recognition (particularly festivals, artistic events, etc. . .) get off the ground thanks to joint financing by the municipality and local private partners, with the casino being among the leading contributors. Thanks to this pooling of resources, these events often have an advertising budget of a national or even international dimension. Successful events, in turn, reinforce the image of the municipality in the media.

The local effects of the casino's marketing policy

  Independently of its compliance with the contract with the community, the casino generally devotes a large budget to its own marketing actions, usually highlighting the specific attractions of the town or the region.

  Thus, by creating activities that attract a very varied population (in terms of both socioprofessional and age groups), the casino boosts the economic life of the municipality. Moreover, the marketing operations that it initiates increase the flow of tourists.

 (a)   Food & beverage

  A food & beverage offer is an essential activity in the running of a casino, firstly because the regulations make in inseparable from the gambling operations and, secondly, because it is a fundamental part of the "leisure infrastructure" that the casino aspires to become.

  The restaurant's positioning, usually upmarket in quality, is generally defined in line with the town's specific features and needs, and avoiding any unnecessary competition with existing restaurants.

 (b) The marketing policy

  Casino operators organise many and varied marketing campaigns, which may include:

    —  Sponsoring local sports events,

    —  Organising promotional campaigns (lotteries, competitions, etc.)

    —  Partnerships with local operators in the tourism sector,

    —  Advertising campaigns in the media, etc.

  Furthermore, if the casino is part of a large group, its marketing actions can be given a national or even international dimension by integrating them into the group's marketing policy.

6.   Conclusion

  By becoming genuine leisure centres with strong links to the local economic life, casinos now play a key role in the tourist and economic infrastructure of their region.

  Their participation in the economic life of the municipality generates additional financial resources for the local community.

  But, most of all, through the organisation of promotional and marketing campaigns to draw visitors, the casinos help to reinforce the town's image at both national and international level.

January 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 7 April 2004