Joint Committee on the Draft Gambling Bill Memoranda


THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF LEISURE PARKS, PIERS & ATTRACTIONS LTD

RESPONSE TO THE PUBLICATION OF THE DRAFT GAMBLING BILL

8th DECEMBER2003

INTRODUCTION

The Association, established in 1936, represents the interests of 118 theme & amusement parks, & piers, accounting for almost 100% of that sector of the Attractions Industry. Our Membership consists of privately and family owned and operated facilities, many of which have been passed down over several generations.

They provide amusement and entertainment for the family market, principally in the socio economic groups of Cl, C2 & D. These groups make up a significant proportion of the British families who continue to holiday, enjoy short breaks, and days out in the U.K.

This point being particularly relevant in relation to some of the new restrictions proposed in the Draft Gambling Bill.

DRAFT GAMBLING BILL

We have found the Draft to be lacking in detail in a number of important clauses. Following the publication of the Policy Instructions earlier in the year, we had anticipated the Draft Bill would contain specific proposals reflecting that Document and the submissions made in response.

In consideration of the above, and in compliance with the request for brevity in response, we have referred primarily to the points referred to in Clause 193: Gaming machines: categories A to D.

Based on our understanding that this clause is likely to contain the detail to which the Policy Instructions referred, we make the following comments.

In addressing the issue of maximum stakes payable, the Policy Instructions referred to a proposed freeze on lOp stake and £5 prize for Category D machines. Should this be included in the Bill it will not allow businesses to recover any increased cost which may result from changes in taxation, minimum wage, increases in utility charges and other expenditure beyond the control of the operator. We propose that the stake and prize remain a matter for the Triennial Review currently in operation and which will we hope be retained.

Value and nature of the prize delivered as a result of use of a Category D machine. The Policy Instructions proposes that the current maximum stake of 30p be reduced to 1 Op and non-monetary prizes such as

cuddly toys be restricted in value to £5, a reduction from the current level of £8, the exception being cranes (grabbers) which will retain the 30p stake but still a restricted prize value of £5. These machines are considered a major part of the entertainment on offer from coastal locations in particular.

Should these proposals be included in the Bill, machines offering non-monetary prizes will cease to be financially viable and result in the removal from the offer available to families who find these machines not only enjoyable to play but an economic opportunity to obtain quality gifts for their children as a souvenir of their visit.

We propose retention of the current level of 30p stake and £8 maximum non-monetary prize value.

Types of premises. Again referring to the Policy Instructions, it is proposed that our Members who currently operate areas restricted to over 18's, known as designated areas, will not have access to the Category B machines in other separately designated areas i.e premises within premises.

The proposal will only allow these machines in premises to which children do not have access.

We believe criteria for premises within premises, not accessible from Family Amusement Centres, could be agreed to allow Category B machines to be operated by our Members. This would allow locations such as theme parks and piers the option of operating these machines and allow our Members to compete with the likely increase in this type of machine in Adult Gaming Centres and the Fixed Odds Betting Terminals being operated in Licensed Betting Offices.

Clause 16 Codes of Practice

Given the existence of voluntary codes of practice within the Industry, we assume these will form the Code proposed by the Commission and will be produced in consultation with the Industry.

Protection of Children

We would refer to the suggestion that the Secretary of State reserves the right to introduce primary legislation to restrict Category D machines for children under 16.

We propose that such legislation could only be introduced following Government sponsored research conducted using a brief agreed with the Industry Associations and in circumstances which have provided clear evidence that such research is necessary.

We maintain that use of Category D machines by children not only allows the whole family to participate in harmless and enjoyable entertainment; it provides an opportunity to encourage responsible attitudes towards the use of machines.

Grandfather Rights

In conclusion, we seek assurance that the protection of Grandfather rights will be respected in relation to the ongoing and future renewal of licenses and permits. The existence of such rights will require clear explanation to ensure that those charged with the future responsibility on these matters are clear in the protection such rights confer on existing businesses.




BALPPA Submission 8th December 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 2 February 2004