Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill Written Evidence



DMH 307 Memorandum from Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Consortium

 We note some improvements made to the 2002 draft e.g.  carers' rights to be considered, safeguards for children and young people and ECT for patients over 16.

 

We are aware that you have received detailed responses to the new draft and we wish to add our voice to the consultation process -in order to highlight our remaining concerns about the Bill:

  • consultation period too short

  • new draft does not appear to mention the Mental Capacity Bill

  • we are asked about the Regulations and Code of Practice yet they are not due to be published until 2007!

  • continued concerns about the abolition of the Approved Social Worker role and the introduction of the role of the Approved Mental Health Professional.  The ASW role is unique in that the practitioner, employed by the local authority to perform this role, operates independently with personal accountability.  We are concerned also that opening the role up to other professionals will detract from their clinical work.

  • the definition of 'mental disorder' remains  vague and too broad;  and there are no exclusions as in the 1983 act,  exclusions which serve to prevent unnecessary detentions.  It appears also as likely to lead to breaches of individuals' Human Rights.

  • the introduction of the concept of a 'Nominated Person' is good in principle, but for the Approved Mental Health Professional to appoint this person at the time of a patient's admission seems problematic

  • re:  Mental Health Review Tribunals;  the availability of panel members is currently very limited leading to regular abuse of patients' rights.  Under the new proposals MHRTs will be doubled.  The implications are obvious.

  • there are huge financial and other resource implications

-  in recruiting advocates,  where will they come from?

-  and recruiting staff into new specialist teams is currently proving very difficult throughout the country

- we will need, as 'available and appropriate treatment', specialist local community and in-patient units for people with severe personality disorders  (acute psychiatric wards are not set up to cope with people with substance abuse and personality disorder)

- we are reducing in-patient beds before other community services - including respite beds - are established and then fully staffed.  These services will be essential for patients on Non-Resident Treatment Orders.

 

We are very concerned about the transition period between the 1983 Act and the implementation of the new Bill.  Trusts throughout the country are in different states of readiness and, therefore, planning and timing is crucial.

 

 ROSEMARY TOLLEY

on behalf of the ASW's of the Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Consortium



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 24 November 2004