DMH 332 Christians Against Mental Slavery
Submission to the Joint Committee on the
Draft Mental Health Bill
from
An international, evangelical Christian
poltical group that wants the non-consensual technological
monitoring or influence of human thought
to be declared a crime against humanity worldwide.
www.Slavery.org.uk || www.ExodusNow.com ||
www.BanMindWeapons.com
30 October 2004
Six of the twelve formal members of Christians
Against Mental Slavery are British. One of the British members
is now living in France, but the rest live in the UK. Two others
are British residents, one German and the other South African.
Another member is South African and living in South Africa.
The remaining three members are US citizens living in the USA.
The group has far more associates than it has full members, and
collaborates with others worldwide who are not necessarily Christians,
on what is a serious, but underpublicised humanitarian
issue. (For example, there is a copy on our website of the speech
made by a British member, on this topic, at a civil rights rally
in Houston, Texas this year.) There is a list of the full members
on our website, with details of academic qualifications and profession
in some cases.
Background
Yesterday, the hearing was held of a successful appeal
against the sectioning under the Mental Health Act of a "client"
of this group.
Earlier this year the client concerned made a complaint at a police
station of assault, perpetrated remotely by unidentifiable assailants
who were apparently armed with the sort of weapons which the European
Parliament said it wanted banned, worldwide, in Resolution
A4-0005/99 Paragraph 27, but which the Home Office has told this
group explicitly that the present government is determined not
even to have discussed publicly, let alone banned. The
client was sectioned and forcible injected, merely because a psychiatrist
formed the subjective opinion that her complaint to the police
was "inherently implausible". (It was conceded that
she had never been a threat to the safety of herself or others,
which had never been alleged.)
A leaflet published by this group was produced at the hearing,
in addition to the somewhat weightier and more scholarly material
mentioned below, and expert testimony was given by the group's
secretary, who also cross-examined the psychiatrist.
This group has written more than five times to the Royal College
of Psychiatrists, without receiving a single reply, asking what
scientific tests British psychiatrists use nowadays, in order
to determine objectively whether those presenting with symptoms
consistent with the abuse of "manipulation" weapons
(to use the term used in the relevant European Parliament resolution),
and perhaps attributing their symptoms to such a source, are genuine
victims of such abuse, or psychotic persons who are hallucinating
the symptoms, and deluded as to the cause of those symptoms.
Recommenations
1. There should be a general statutory obligation for psychiatrists
to refrain from diagnosing delusion before they have conducted
rigorous investigations which are capable of determining scientifically
whether the untypical beliefs they consider to be "delusional"
are (1) potentially true after all, or (2) demostrably false,
with the patient being given the benefit of any possible doubt.
2. Until manipulation weapons have been banned worldwide and existing
stocks placed beyond further use (as requested in our petition,
an outcome which the present government declines to pursue), this
should expressly include an express obligation to eliminate rigorously
before diagnosis (using Faraday Cage shielding if necessary),
any possibility must that the genesis of symptoms is the abuse
by third parties of electromagnetic manipulation weapons,
which can penetrate solid barriers such as walls of brick or stone,
and hence can be abused remotely.
3. Any inability of a victim to explain why he in particular
should have been picked for non-consensual experimentation with,
or operational deployment of, manipulation weapons, should no
more be grounds for diagnosing "delusion" than the inability
of a rape victim to explain why the rapist picked on her,
amongst all the women (some of them prettier) the rapist could
have chosen to rape but didn't, would be considered adequate grounds
for inferring automatically that the rape victim was fabricating
any rape allegation brought.
4. Due allowance must be made for the fact that those who report
manipulation abuse might not be scientifically educated, and might
therefore be unable to explain what would, in any case, only be
their best guesses as to how the weapons deployed to their detriment
function.
5. In view of the known congruence between (1) the documented
bioeffects that can be caused, intentionally or maliciously, by
microwave radiation and (2) known symptoms of schizophrenia, it
is also necessary for microwave causation of symptoms, whether
deliberate or accidentally, to be eliminated, before any attribution
of those symptoms to a psychiatric cause would be lawful, even
in cases where the patient presents without alleging manipulation
weapon abuse.
Rationale
I shall not rehearse here the more obvious rationales for our
proposals, of which the Committee can think or remind itself unaided,
rationales that are based upon ordinary notions of public safety
and fairness. I shall confine myself here to two novel
arguments, which might not have been considered before.
1. The abuse of manipulation weapons is intendedly impossible
to prove on the part of any individual plaintiff, against any
specific defendant who is perpetrating that abuse remotely, of
which remote perpetration such weapons are capable. As with the
now acknowleged health risks associated with tobacco use or exposure
to asbestos, it can only be proved that such abuse is likely
to be taking place amongst a particular population, by the use
of statistics. This epidemiological evidence of a tell-tale
trend is masked by the routine sectioning of anybody who (for
example) attends a police station in order to make a complaint
that they are being "zapped" non-consensually, in this
way or that, because sectioning complainants discredits
their testimony.
2. Psychiatry has failed to rise to the new challenge which the
modern age has presented, which, our backing evidence shows, includes
the wilfull agenda to develop weapons whose use can simulate mental
illnesses, weapons as likely to motivate testing that violates
the Nuremburg Code as did atomic weapons, whose affects we now
know were ascertained unethically. It is therefore unsafe
to allow psychiatry the luxury of continued "self-regulation".
In the public interest, new statute law must now impose, explicitly,
for the first time, the burdens prescribed in our recommendations,
which are burdens which psychiatry has shown itself unwilling
to shoulder voluntarily.
Supporting Evidence
The following scientific papers are offered, as material supplementary
to this submission, in support of the contention that nowadays
it is technologically feasible for unknown assailants to perpetrate,
remotely, effects such as those who complain at police stations
of those effects are apt to find themselves summarily and unjustly
sectioned, a factor which impedes the efforts of those determined
to put onto the domestic political agenda the sidelined concerns
of the European Parliament.
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the
Light of Mind Invasive Technology
Carole Smith
http://sysos.co.uk/Brighton/NewCriteria.doc
Microwave Bioeffect Congruence With Schizophrenia
John McMurtrey
http://www.slavery.org.uk/MicrowaveCongruenceSchiz.doc
Inner Voice, Target Tracking, and Behavioral Influence Technologies
John McMurtrey
http://www.slavery.org.uk/InnerVoiceTargTrackBehavInflu.doc
Review of Literature Related to Recording Microwave Hearing
Transmissions by Microphones, and Consideration of Recordings
by an Affiant to Remote Harassment
(short title: Recording Microwave Hearing Effects)
John McMurtrey
http://slavery.org.uk/RecordingMicrowaveHearingEffects.doc
Thought Reading Capacity
John McMurtrey
http://www.slavery.org.uk/ThoughtReadingCapacity.doc
Pinneo's 1975 Research Into Technological Thought Reading
short factsheet by John Allman
http://sysos.co.uk/Brighton/pinneo1.doc
Feasibility Study For Design of a Biocybernetic Communication
System
Lawrence Pinneo et al
http://www.slavery.org.uk/Pinneo.doc
Physiologic Word Recognition From Cognitive State
John McMurtrey
http://www.slavery.org.uk/PhysiologicWordRecognition.doc
Remote EEG Discussion
John McMurtrey
http://www.slavery.org.uk/RemoteEEGDiscussion.doc
Our websites publish some of the correspondence conducted over
a period of about nine months with various government ministries,
and others, which substaniates our claims appertaining to the
political support we receive, and the opposition we encounter.
A goodly portion of that correspondence was with the Home Office's
Security and Intelligence Liaison Unit.
We maintain multiple copies of our website because of past experience
of a denial of a service attack and other downtime, when we had
only a single copy of the website. One such episode was timed
to coincide with an appearance made by a group member on national
television in the UK. Another (affecting only one site) took
place around the time of the Labour conference, at which we exhibited.
The amusing tri-fold leaflet summarising our political position,
produced for insertion into the Christian Peoples Alliance party
conference delegates' pack, is viewable at http://www.sysos.co.uk/CPAtri-fildLeaflet.doc.
Christians Against Mental Slavery
| 
