Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill Written Evidence


DMH 242 Alzheimer's Society

Memorandum
To:Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill
From:Alzheimer's Society
Date:21 October 2004

DRAFT MENTAL HEALTH BILL

Introduction

The Alzheimer's Society is the UK's leading care and research charity for people with dementia, their families and carers.

Dementia affects over 750,000 people in the UK alone. The Alzheimer's Society has over 25,000 members and works through a network of over 250 branches and support groups. It provides information and support for people with any form of dementia and their carers through its publications, helplines, website and local network. It advises professionals, runs quality care services and campaigns for improved health and social care and greater public understanding of dementia. The Society funds an innovative programme of biomedical and social research in the areas of cause, cure and care.

The Society has concerns about the proposed Mental Health Bill that relate to the lack of safeguards for people with dementia who are informally detained. We do not believe the provisions of the Mental Capacity Bill are sufficient to close the gaps left by the Mental Health Bill.

Are people with dementia affected by the Bill?

There are thousands of people with dementia detained informally in care homes and in hospital. In many cases people with dementia are detained informally because they do not have the capacity to give consent, but do not resist treatment or detention so are not sectioned under the Mental Health Act.

There are also a number of people with dementia are detained against their will without being sectioned. These include people who are in locked wards and care homes.

There are also a small but significant number of people with dementia who lack capacity and are detained compulsorily. The review of research relating to the Mental Health Act (1983) found that of people over 65 who are sectioned, up to 48 per cent had a diagnosis of dementia.

All groups require adequate safeguards that protect them from abuse and bad practice.

Lack for safeguards for those detained informally

The Mental Health Bill does not provide safeguards for people with dementia detained informally. As the Bill stands they have no right to assessment or a care plan, and no right to ask for a review of treatment or to challenge detention. This lack of protection was highlighted by the recent ruling on the Bournewood case which concluded that the informal detention of HL was a breach of his human rights.

People with dementia are particularly vulnerable to abuse. This could include physical, psychological, financial or sexual abuse and neglect. In addition, the care provided to people with dementia is frequently of a poor standard, often due to the lack of staff trained in caring for people with dementia. The Society estimates that, even though three quarters of people in care homes have some form of dementia, only 10 per cent of care home staff are trained in working with people with dementia. The inadequate care experienced by people with dementia highlights the importance of adequate safeguards and the right to contest poor care practices.

Of particular concern to the Alzheimer's Society is the frequent overprescription of neuroleptic drugs experienced by people with dementia. These drugs are often used to deal with behavioural symptoms of dementia, rather than attempting to investigate and understand the cause of the behaviour. They are often prescribed over long periods of time with no review of their use. If the Bill provided the same kinds of safeguards to people detained informally as for those who are sectioned, people with dementia would be entitled to have their treatment reviewed. This would help to guard against unacceptable practices such as overuse of neuroleptics.

The safeguards contained in the Draft Mental Health Bill 2002 for people detained informally were helpful, but whether a person was protected by them depended on setting rather than the needs of the individual. The safeguards did not apply to people with dementia detained informally within a residential home. While it may appear that residents in nursing homes are more likely to have high needs and require protection from safeguards, high proportions of older people living in residential homes also have dementia and therefore require the protection of these types of safeguards.

The Society believes that all people with dementia should have the right to a care plan and a review of that care plan within a specified period of time. We know that while this is available to some people, there are many whose care is not properly planned or reviewed and so does not meet their needs. However, those people with dementia who are detained informally within a care home, and have not appointed an LPA, are a particularly vulnerable group who are often subject to abuse and neglect. For this reason their rights need to be protected by the same kinds of safeguards available to those who have been compulsorily detained.

The Mental Capacity Bill

The Alzheimer's Society does not share the Government's confidence that the Mental Capacity Bill will provide adequate protection for people with dementia detained informally. While we welcome many aspects of the Mental Capacity Bill, its provisions do not match the safeguards provided by the Draft Mental Health Bill 2002. As the Mental Capacity Bill stands, it will not allow patients detained informally the right to a tribunal, statutory care plan or access to an advocate as the Draft Mental Health Bill 2002 would have. The independent consultees included in the Mental Capacity Bill are likely to have a much more limited role than an advocate and will only be available in a very limited number of circumstances. These deficiencies make it more likely that people with dementia are left in care homes or hospital without properly planned and reviewed treatment and care and with no right to appeal against poor care or abusive treatment.

However, we believe it is necessary to have a mental capacity framework, provided by the Mental Capacity Bill, in place before the Mental Health Bill is implemented. The Mental Capacity Bill's general principles which include assuming that a person has capacity, a requirement to act in the person without capacity's best interests and attempting to maximise decision making, provide the basis upon which the Mental Health Bill can operate in terms of people who may not have capacity.

The Alzheimer's Society believes the government needs to consider the gap in the protection of vulnerable groups created by the inadequacies of the two bills and work to remove the disparity in the safeguards provided to people detained formally and informally.

We would welcome clarification on whether decisions made by the nominated person, as set out in the Mental Health Bill, will override decisions contained within an advance directive, as set out by the Mental Capacity Bill, should an individual be compulsorily detained. This needs to be made clear if the legislation is to work effectively.

Aftercare

The Society disagrees with the reduction of free, integrated health and social care services for people who have been discharged from compulsory hospital treatment to just six weeks. This period of time will be inadequate for many people with dementia leaving hospital following compulsory treatment. These individuals are likely to have a high level of need and will require intensive support from health and social services. This support is a health need and should not therefore be means tested and should be available for as long as is required by the individual.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 30 November 2004