Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill Written Evidence


DMH 15 Memorandum from Leslie Carr

I am submitting this as an individual rather than a member of an Agency. As an Approved Social Worker working in an Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit whilst also sitting as a Justice of the Peace I am particularly interested in the relationship between the proposed Mental Health Bill and the proposed Mental Capacity Bill and I am offering a suggestion concerning 'moving' people without capacity from the Mental Health field to the Mental Capacity field.

1) One of the achievements of the MH Bill and the MC Bill is to move those with a Learning Disability and Acquired Brain Injury out of the field of Mental Health into a new field of Mental Capacity by removing the diagnoses of Severe/Mental Impairment from Mental Health legislation.

2) This is likely to be beneficial as working in the area of ASW/ABI for several years I have had, on several occasions to use the 1983 MHA when the health or safety of the ABI sufferer as been at risk. Although this is legal it has always felt uncomfortable as it has often meant an individual with specific ABI needs left inappropriately on a psychiatric ward for several weeks.

3) At present there is nothing outside MH legislation for the care and control of those without a MH diagnosis except common law and the rare use of a High Court statutory declaration. The MC bill will of course change this with Lasting Power of Attorney and Court Appointed Deputies.

4) However it is unclear as to whether the MC bill will cope with emergency intervention as not all will have a LPA and a CAD is unlikely to be available in the few hours that a genuine emergency requires.

5) As such it is likely that many sufferers of Acquired Brain Injuries or Learning Disabilities when in an emergency will become under the remit of the MH Bill and admitted to Psychiatric Hospitals under its powers.

6) Although it is likely that clinicians and practitioners will take steps to transfer such individuals to the Mental Capacity field it is unlikely to prove a speedy resolution and it will take weeks and probably months before their care is transferred, leaving them in a totally inappropriate environment for far too long.

7) What appears to me to be one possible option is to extend the power of the Mental Health Tribunal at the 28 day stage. If it appears to the Tribunal that the individual needs to be managed under the Mental Capacity Bill rather than the Mental Health Bill then the Tribunal should have the power to impose an Interim Court Appointed Deputyship, perhaps to the Chief Executive of an appropriate body like a Health Trust or Social Services, for a period of 28 days.

80 This would achieve the goal of removing the individual with ABI/LD from the Mental Health field, keep an element of care and control in place for emergency situations whilst ensuring a review within 28 days by a court qualified to deal with issues of Mental Capacity.




 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 15 October 2004