Joint Committee On Human Rights Sixteenth Report


2 General mandate of the Commission

Areas of consensus

11. In general we welcome the wide areas of agreement between our proposals for the functions of the Commission and those of the Government. We welcome in particular the proposals relating to the spreading of good practice in the public sector, working with the private sector, capacity building in the voluntary sector and amongst independent legal practitioners, promoting human rights education, and working through existing agencies to give leverage to the efforts of the Commission. We are pleased to note the prominence given to the task of promoting good community relations through a human rights framework. We look forward to examining the detail of these functions when they emerge as definite legislative proposals.

Protection of human rights

12. Paragraph 3.9 of the White Paper states that the CEHR "will promote awareness and understanding of human rights". It goes on to say that the Commission will "spread good practice and promote support for human rights throughout the public sector", including in bodies carrying out public functions and services.[6]

13. We fully support these aims, and agree that "promotion will be central to the CEHR's human rights role",[7] but we remind the Government that we said in our Report that the new body should be given the general duty "to promote understanding and awareness, and to help secure the protection, of human rights in Great Britain".[8] It would not be sufficient if the mandate of the new commission were to be without reference to helping to secure the protection of these rights, or if this aspect of its mandate were to be couched as a function rather than a duty.[9] We consider this to be an essential element of its work. The mandate of the South African Human Rights Commission, which we recently visited, provides a good model. It is to—

… promote respect for human rights and a culture of human rights; promote the protection, development and attainment of human rights; and monitor and assess the observance of human rights in the Republic.[10]

International obligations

14. Paragraphs 3.12 to 3.14 of the White Paper discuss the human rights which will form the basis of the Commission's mandate. We have no quarrel with the statement that the Convention rights within the meaning of the Human Rights Act will form the "core" of the Commission's work in this area.[11] We are pleased to note that the White Paper acknowledges the rights and obligations contained in other human rights instruments, and confirms that the Commission will address human rights in a broad, inclusive sense.[12]

15. These proposals are consonant with our own recommendations.[13] However, we would not want the mandate of the Commission to emphasise an apparent hierarchy of human rights obligations. The Convention rights do have a special status following incorporation; to some extent this places a special obligation on the Commission to raise awareness of the other international instruments. It should have an express power to participate in the reporting processes relating to these treaties.[14] We would stress in particular the valuable role we envisage the Commission could play in enhancing awareness of these obligations within Government, and in improving the level of attention given to the requirements to report under most of these treaties on the extent to which the UK is taking steps to advance compliance.[15]

The public and private sectors

16. A submission to our inquiry noted an inconsistency in the White Paper's references to working with the private sector.[16] At paragraph 3.9 it refers to "private sector bodies carrying out public functions and services". At paragraph 7.38 it refers to bodies "contracted to carry out or deliver services to the public". We discussed the issue of the application of the duty under section 6 of the Human Rights Act at length in a recent report.[17] We would emphasise again that it is the nature of the function, not the nature of any contract, that should determine the application of the Act. The ambit of the CEHR should be interpreted similarly.

Public sector duties

17. In our report, we concluded that we were persuaded that imposing a "positive" or "general" public sector duty to promote human rights would be an effective way of advancing a culture of respect for human rights and of ensuring greater focus by public authorities on their positive obligations to protect human rights. It would also—

… provide a firm statutory foundation for the framework within which the new commission would operate, giving it a very clear role in the articulation of guidance for the implementation of the duty. Requiring public authorities to assess all of their functions and policies for relevance to human rights and equality, and in the light of that assessment to draw up a strategy for placing human rights and equality at the heart of policy making, decision making and service delivery, would be an effective way of achieving the mainstreaming of human rights and equality which will be one of the commission's principal purposes.[18]

We note that the Government's White paper does not deal with the introduction of a public sector duty relating to human rights, and we recommend that the Bill does so.

18. We are pleased to note the undertaking in the White Paper to introduce public sector duties, similar to that in the Race Relations (Amendment) Act, in relation to equality of opportunity for disabled people and between men and women.[19] However, we see no reason why similar duties should not be introduced in the new Bill covering all the strands of prohibited discrimination. Obviously there will need to be adjustments for particular strands such as sexual orientation and religious discrimination where issues of personal privacy will arise but subject to that, there is a need for equal protection for all.


6   Seventh Report, Session 2003-04, The Meaning of Public Authority under the Human Rights Act, HL Paper 39/HC 382. Back

7   Cm 6185, para. 3.15. Back

8   Eleventh Report, Session 2003-04, op cit., para. 14. Back

9   See for example the comments of Francesca Klug and Claire O'Brien, Appendix 9, para. 2.1. Back

10   South African Constitution, Chapter 9, Article 184. Back

11   Cm 6185, para. 3.14. Back

12   Cm 6185, para. 3.13. Back

13   Eleventh Report, Session 2003-04, op cit., paras. 15-22. Back

14   Appendix 9, para. 2.4. Back

15   The UK has an obligation to submit periodic reports under the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR); the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD); the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT); the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the European Social Charter. Back

16   Appendix 9, para. 2.2. Back

17   Seventh Report, Session 2003-04, op cit. Back

18   Eleventh Report, Session 2003-04, op cit., para. 32. Back

19   Cm 6185, paras. 7.56 to 7.58. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 4 August 2004