Joint Committee On Human Rights Written Evidence


6.Memorandum from the Local Government Association

  The extent of delegation to private and voluntary organisations in local government

  This is very difficult to gauge as outsourcing is no longer monitored centrally. There are a great deal of contracts out there across a very wide range of services—any central database would require a significant resource commitment to maintain. An estimate from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister for 2001, in respect of service contracts (which will not include private finance initiatives nor, probably, social care commissioning) was £1.3 billion, with an authority having on average 5+ contracts averaging about £600,000+ each. The total figure then must be greater than this.

  Advice and guidance and the inclusion of clauses in contracts

  The LGA has not issued any specific guidance in light of recent Court decisions but the Improvement and Development Agency (IDeA), one of our sister agencies, is currently compiling a set of detailed practical guidance notes on procurement, which will include model contract clauses, one of which will be a model clause relating to the protection of Convention rights in contracts. In the absence of a detailed survey it is impossible to know to what extent such clauses are presently included in contractual arrangements between local authorities and private service providers. The IDeA guidance is expected to be issued in the summer.

  The existing legislative structure

  The LGA does not have a definitive view as to whether the existing legislative structure is sufficient to ensure adequate protection of Convention rights in relation to contracted out services. A structured survey of the varying contractual arrangements entered into by local authorities could give us an indication as to whether human rights are being protected but without this information we are unable to form a view as to whether this is or isn't the case.

  The issues raised in the press notice of the Call for Evidence regarding accountability are similar to the issues which have to be tackled in respect of the new positive duty on all public authorities to promote race equality, introduced by the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, in relation to contracted out services. The duty to promote race equality falls on public authorities but not on the private sector or the voluntary sector, hence public authorities are accountable for the services provided on their behalf by private and voluntary sector agencies. The LGA and the CRE have recently been consulting on draft guidance for local authorities, "Race Equality and Procurement in Local Government: A Guide to Meeting the Duty to Promote Race Equality". The final guidance document should be ready for launch in June. The JCHR may wish to consider how the principles in this guidance might be applicable to addressing Convention rights within contractual arrangements between public authorities and their service providers. The consultation draft is available on the CRE website at www.cre.gov.uk.

24 April 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 3 March 2004