Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Eighth Report


Appendix 1 S.I. 2003/3122: memorandum from the Department for Transport

Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Private Hire Vehicles) (Carriage of Guide Dogs etc.) (England and Wales) Regulations 2003 (S.I. 2003/3122)

1. The Committee has asked the Department to submit a Memorandum on the following point:

In its 2nd Report of Session 2000-2001, the Committee reported the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Taxis) (Carrying of Guide Dogs etc.)(England and Wales) Regulations 2000 on the grounds that regulation 1(1) was defectively drafted and regulation 2(2) contained an unexpected use of the relevant enabling power. Regulations 1(1) and 2(2) of this instrument are for all material purposes identical to those provisions. Why were the Committee's points not addressed when this instrument was drafted?

2. The Department acknowledges that it did not identify the earlier report at the time of drafting the new Regulations, and apologises for this omission.

3. As regards regulation 1(1), it is accepted that it is defectively drafted.

4. As regards regulation 2(2), paragraph 13 of the Committee's Report on the 2000 Regulations concludes -

In the Committee's view it is an unexpected use of the enabling power to prescribe a form of notice with material on both sides but then to prescribe that it be exhibited in a way in which only one side is visible, and it reports regulation 2(2) on those grounds.

5. The Department remains of the view that the approach adopted in the Regulations is appropriate. The warning printed on the rear of the notice is for the driver's benefit and the driver should read this before affixing the notice. The Department is not aware of any difficulties arising from the provision in the 2000 Regulations and no complaints have been received on the subject either from the public or from local authorities.

19 January 2004

S.I. 2003/3122: second memorandum from the Department for Transport

1. The Committee has asked the Department to submit a Memorandum on the following points:

(1) The Department acknowledges, in its memorandum of 19 January, that it did not identify the Committee's earlier report when these Regulations were drafted. What arrangements does the Department have in place to ensure that those responsible for the preparation of statutory instruments are aware of relevant issues raised in the Committee's reports, and why did the arrangements fail in this instance?

2. The Department's standing instructions to lawyers engaged in drafting statutory instruments include a requirement to check for comments of the JCSI on any instrument being amended or consolidated. Lawyers are expected to make a similar check of any instrument which is being used as a precedent. A database of memoranda submitted by the Department to the JCSI is available for this purpose. Regretfully on this occasion the check was not made. This particular incident has been brought to the attention of all lawyers who have been reminded of the importance of carrying out the check. The Department once again apologises for this oversight.

(2) With regard to the Department's comments on regulation 2(2), explain:

(a) in what way the warning benefits the driver named in the notice;

3. The Department's memorandum of 19 January stated that "The warning printed on the rear of the notice is for the driver's benefit and the driver should read this before affixing the notice." This means that it is directed at the driver. The warning reminds the driver that the exemption is a personal one and that he should not leave the notice on display when he is not driving the vehicle.

(b) if the warning is intended to be addressed to that driver alone, what is its purpose and why does the Department not intend to address a warning to drivers other than the named driver;

4. The warning is addressed to the licensed driver to whom the exemption notice has been issued. It reminds him of the personal nature of the exemption, which will have been granted on medical grounds. The Department does not consider it necessary to warn other drivers by means of the notice of exemption, since the notice of exemption is issued to a specific driver, on medical grounds. Other drivers are notified of the system for granting such exemptions by means of a guidance leaflet for drivers which makes clear the personal nature of the exemption. Copies of the guidance leaflet are available to all drivers.

(c) if the warning is intended to be addressed to other drivers, how they are to be aware of the warning.

5. The warning is not intended to be addressed to other drivers. Nevertheless, the Department considers that the warning would also serve to inform other drivers who happen to come into possession of the notice that they should not be displaying the notice when they are driving.

2 February 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 February 2004