Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments First Report


2 S.I. 2003/2601: defective drafting

National Crime Squad (Dispensation from Requirement to Investigate Complaints) Regulations 2003 (S.I. 2003/2601)

2.1 The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to these Regulations on the ground that they are defectively drafted.

2.2 Regulation 3(1) permits the appropriate authority to request the Police Complaints Authority to grant a dispensation from the requirement to investigate a complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the National Crime Squad where it is of the opinion that paragraph (2) or (3) applies. In the copies provided to the Committee, paragraph (2) ends ", or".

2.3 The Committee therefore asked the Home Office whether something had been omitted at the end of paragraph (2) and, as paragraphs (2) and (3) are also ungrammatical, how they are intended to read.

2.4 In a memorandum printed at Appendix 2, the Department states that no text has been omitted at the end of paragraph (2) and that the paragraphs are intended to read as they appear in the printed instrument, but it concedes that it might have been helpful to have included the words "This paragraph applies where" at the beginning of each of the paragraphs. The Committee agrees that the inclusion of such a phrase would have improved the clarity of the provisions (which would have been further improved by the omission of "that" wherever it appears in both paragraphs). The Committee notes that in the published version of the instrument ", or" at the end of paragraph (2) has been replaced with a full stop.

2.5 The Committee accordingly reports regulation 3(2) and (3) for defective drafting, acknowledged by the Department.

2.6 Regulation 4(1)(d) and paragraph 3(2)(b) of the Schedule each refer to a complaint having been resolved in accordance with the provisions of section 83 of the Police Act 1997. The Department accepts that, given that section 83 requires regulations to make provision for the handling of complaints, these references should have been to regulations made under that section.

2.7 The Department also acknowledges that the reference in regulation 4(1)(d) to regulation 3 of the Police (Complaints) (Informal Resolution) Regulations 1985 should have been to regulation 5 of that instrument, and that the relevant footnote (which is entirely misleading) is incorrect.

2.8 The Department undertakes to correct these errors at the first suitable opportunity, and the Committee accordingly reports regulation 4(1)(d) and paragraph 3(2)(b) of the Schedule for defective drafting, acknowledged by the Department.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 8 December 2003