Joint committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill First Report


Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

The Joint Committee

1.  The Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill was appointed by a motion of the House of Commons on 2 May 2007 and a motion of the House of Lords on 8 May 2007 with terms of reference "to consider and report on any draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill presented to both Houses by a Minister of the Crown" and to "report on the draft Bill by 25th July 2007".[1] The motions directed the Committee to meet for the first time on 15 May 2007. The Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill was duly presented to Parliament on 17 May 2007 sponsored by the Department of Health.[2]

Scope of our inquiry

2.  In the time available for our inquiry we have necessarily had to prioritise some issues over others. We were advised by the Clerk of Public Bills in the House of Lords and the Clerk of Legislation in the House of Commons that, if a Bill in terms similar to the draft Bill were to be introduced, amendments relating to termination of pregnancy (abortion), the retention of tissue samples and presumed consent for organ donation would in principle be orderly. While we recognise that these are important issues, we took a decision at the start that abortion and presumed consent for organ donation would not form a specific part of our inquiry because they do not form part of the draft Bill. We do cover the retention of tissue samples in Chapter 5. We also acknowledge there are other important issues relevant to the debate, in particular recent developments in adult stem cell research, but again these have not formed part of our inquiry. We note that during our inquiry, the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee announced an inquiry into Scientific Developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967.

Timing

3.  We welcome the decision to present this draft Bill for pre-legislative scrutiny although we note the limited time we were given to undertake our inquiry—just under 9 sitting weeks from the publication of the draft Bill (less than the recommended 12 sitting weeks).[3] However, we have used the time available to undertake a thorough investigation of the draft Bill and make a number of recommendations in this report based on evidence we have received.

Evidence and other views received

4.  Despite the short timescale, we have sought a wide range of evidence to inform our Report and we would like to thank all those who gave us their views. We heard oral evidence from 46 witnesses comprising expert specialists, representatives of interested organisations and individuals. We held an evening discussion forum with 11 organisations representing particular moral and ethical perspectives and a report of this forum is published in Appendix 5. We had 115 submissions of written evidence. More than 100 other submissions were received. Some of these addressed abortion and other issues not under direct consideration by the Committee. Many more were inspired by a campaign by Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) and covered issues such as the need for a father provision (in relation to fertility treatment), the creation of inter-species embryos, human reproductive cloning and the regulation making powers of the Secretary of State.[4] The Committee also conducted an online consultation on four questions via its website (a report of the online consultation is printed in Appendix 6). The House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee assisted us by commenting on the delegated powers in the draft Bill (the Committee's advice is printed in Appendix 7). In producing our Report, we have sought to give due consideration to everything we have heard and read. A full list of witnesses is set out in Appendix 2 and a separate volume of evidence will be published to accompany this report.

Acknowledgements

5.  We would like to record our thanks to our Specialist Advisers, Professor Martin Johnson, Professor of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience at the University of Cambridge and Professor Sheila McLean, Professor of Law and Ethics in Medicine at the University of Glasgow, for their valuable input and assistance during the course of this inquiry.


1   Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commons Wednesday 2 May 2007, House of Lords Minutes of Proceedings of Tuesday 8 May 2007 Back

2   Cm 7087 Back

3   Report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Charities Bill, September 2004, HL 167-I / HC 660-I. See also Report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Legal Services Bill, July 2006, HL 232-I / HC 1154-I, House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee Eighth Report of Session 2005-06, Reform of the coroners' system and death certification, HC 902-I Back

4   Ev66, See also CARE special briefing: The draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill, 25 May 2007, http://www.care.org.uk/Publisher/article.aspx?id=79612 (correct as at time of publication) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 1 August 2007