Draft Bribery Bill - Joint Committee on the Draft Bribery Bill Contents


Annex 2

SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTIONS TO BAE SYSTEMS, LOCKHEED MARTIN AND THALES

THALES UK RESPONSES

1.  Please could you summarise the impact that the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has had on your business.

  Thales' policy has always been to strictly abide by the laws of the countries where it operates. It is particularly true for the subsidiaries that operate in the US, which have internal procedures to comply with American laws.

  The 1997 OECD Convention, signed 20 years after the FCPA, integrated the goal of the FCPA and enhanced it marginally. Thales anti-corruption Group-wide procedures and organisation is set to abide by the OECD Convention as a whole, and by all national implementing legislations of the signatory countries where the Group operates.

2.  What impact, if any, would the draft Bribery Bill have on your organisation's systems and business practices were it to be made law?

  Following the 1997 OECD Convention, Thales has deployed a robust Group-wide organisation and policy to prevent corruption. Whilst we would review our policies and procedures in the light of any new legislation in order to ensure compliance, we do not anticipate the need to make substantial changes were the Bribery Bill to be enacted in its current form.

3.  How workable, from your company's perspective, is the "legitimately due" test under clause 4(3)(b) of the draft Bill?

  We fully endorse the concerns expressed, and amendments suggested, by the CBI in their written evidence paper to the Committee.

4.  What is your view on where the burden of proof should lie for the new corporate offence provided for in clauses 5 and 6 of the draft Bill: should it be a matter for the prosecution to prove negligence, or for the defence to prove adequate procedures or due diligence?

  We endorse the views of the CBI and the Anti-Corruption Forum in their written evidence to the Committee on this proposed offence.

5.  Are there any specific changes that should be made to the draft Bill that you have not had an opportunity to identify before now?

  Please see our general evidence paper that accompanies these responses.

6.  Is there any further information that you wish to supply in connection with your appearance on 3 June?

  Please see our general evidence paper and the Thales Group Head Office response requested by the Committee.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 28 July 2009