Legislative Scrutiny: Equality Bill - Human Rights Joint Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Help the Aged

  1.  Help the Aged is pleased to have this opportunity to submit evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on:

    — The significant human rights issues likely to be raised by the Equality Bill.

    — Whether the Equality Bill presents opportunities to enhance protection of human rights.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  2.  The Equality Bill will enable the principles of non-discrimination to be enshrined in domestic legislation.

  3.  The Equality Bill presents an opportunity to significantly improve the provision of healthcare services, especially mental healthcare, and social care services to older people.

  4.  We believe that the Equality Bill could tackle social exclusion and isolation for older people. Prohibiting age discrimination in goods, facilities and services can significantly improve older people's enjoyment of their human rights.

  5.  It is concerning that in the areas in which age discrimination legislation has already been passed discrimination is still allowed to continue, for example through mandatory retirement ages.

INTRODUCTION

  6.  Help the Aged welcomes the proposal to introduce an Equality Bill and believes that this represents an opportunity to make significant developments in the protection and promotion of older people's human rights. We are, however, concerned that during the process of getting from the Draft Legislative Programme to a draft Bill some of this ambition may be lost and we fear that the end product may fall short of realising the full opportunity that this Bill presents.

  7.  Help the Aged has previously argued that deep seated age discrimination deprives older people of rights that the rest of society is able to take for granted.[164] Legislation to prohibit discrimination is the first step to challenging deep-seated and ingrained attitudes that should have no place in contemporary society. It is clear that similar legislation on discrimination has made a considerable difference to public attitudes and perceptions with regards to race and gender. In this way legislation can send a clear message:

    "The law can be employed as an unequivocal declaration of public policy. It gives support to those who do not wish to discriminate, but feel compelled to do so by social pressure… At its most effective, it has the ability to reduce prejudice by discouraging behaviour in which prejudice finds expression."[165]

  8.  Placing a positive duty on public bodies may help to ensure the effective protection of existing human rights that are currently inadequately protected. In other words there is scope for the Equality Bill to strengthen conformity with, and enforcement of, the Human Rights Act 1998.

  9.  We believe that the Equality Bill represents an opportunity to enhance protection of rights far wider than simply those contained in the ECHR. For instance, Help the Aged views equality and non-discrimination as basic human rights, but while it is clear from Article 14 that equality and non-discrimination are fundamental human rights principles, Article 14 only applies the prohibition on discrimination with the enjoyment of the rights contained in Articles 2 to 13. The Twelfth Protocol to the ECHR extends the prohibition on discrimination to the "enjoyment of any right set forth by law". It is unfortunate that the United Kingdom has not signed the Twelfth Protocol, but Help the Aged believes that the Equality Bill effectively presents an opportunity to secure the prohibition on discrimination contained in the Twelfth Protocol into domestic law. This will also reflect the importance of prohibiting discrimination in other Human Rights instruments.[166]

HEALTHCARE

  10.  The JCHR has previously recommended that age discrimination should be prohibited in the provision of healthcare.[167] We wholeheartedly agree. There is clear evidence that not enough is being done to protect older people's Article 2 rights. There are many examples of the importance of removing age discrimination and ageist attitudes. To take just one, we are aware of a woman who complained to her GP for years about back pain. He dismissed her complaint as "old age" and never examined her. It was only when she moved house and was sent for a scan by a new GP that it was discovered that she had a tumour the size of a football in her back, which could have killed her. To put it bluntly, age discrimination can be a matter of life or death.

  11.  However, Help the Aged also believes that the Equality Bill will enable the protection of older people where healthcare is involved but the situation is not so serious that their Article 2 rights are engaged. In these situations Help the Aged believes that the Equality Bill will enable the rights contained in Article 12 of the ICESCR to be strengthened for older people:

    "… the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health."[168]

  All the evidence suggests that older people are not offered the highest attainable standard of physical health. Help the Aged believes that this partly stems from attitudes towards older people. For example, 29 per cent of over-65s agree that health professionals tend to treat older people as a nuisance.[169]

  12.  Important healthcare maintenance services which are particularly used by older people, for example podiatry and foot care services,[170] are given low priority by Primary Care Trusts, resulting in older people losing mobility and becoming socially isolated.[171] A public sector equality duty for age could help to ensure that resources were more equally shared between services predominantly used by older people, and those used by other age groups.

MENTAL HEALTHCARE

  13.  In addition to physical healthcare the Equality Bill could have a tremendous impact on mental healthcare. The ICESCR specifically mentions mental health.[172] The right to good mental health and effective mental healthcare services can also be seen to engage ECHR Article 8, as stated by the European Court of Human Rights:

    "Mental health must also be regarded as a crucial part of private life associated with the aspect of moral integrity. Article 8 protects a right to identity and personal development, and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world. The preservation of mental stability is in that context an indispensable precondition to effective enjoyment of the right to respect for private life."[173]

  Furthermore the House of Lords has stated clearly that "the preservation of mental stability can be regarded as a right protected by article 8".[174]

  14.  As depression is a major risk factor for suicide it is clear that ECHR Article 2 can be engaged.[175]

  15.  Mental health provisions for older people are vital. For instance, there are around 2.4 million older people with depression severe enough to impair their quality of life.[176] Around 400 people aged 75 or over committed suicide in 2006.[177]

  16.  Many mental health services are subject to a cut off at the age of 65. We believe that this blatant discrimination is clearly contrary to the principles of non-discrimination and would run counter to the proposed legislation on age discrimination.

  17.  We believe that promoting age equality will help to promote good mental health and well-being for older people. The Equality Bill can play a key role in delivering a "society where the needs of older people with mental health problems and the needs of their carers are understood, taken seriously, given their fair share of attention and resources, and met in a way that enables them to lead meaningful and productive lives".[178] The UK Inquiry into Mental Health and Well-Being in Later Life concluded that age discrimination was the fundamental problem and that the scale of depression in people aged over 65 demanded a public health approach.[179]

HOUSING

  18.  Help the Aged believes that not enough is done to meet the housing needs of older people and to ensure respect for the homes of older people. This is particularly important with regards to homelessness.

  19.  Homelessness among older people is generally given a lower priority than that affecting other age groups. Many older homeless people have specific needs that require a tailored approach when developing strategies. A survey found that 60 per cent of homeless people aged over 50 had three or more presenting problems in addition to homelessness.[180] As local housing authorities will be under the proposed public sector equality duty we believe that this could lead to a, long overdue, equivalent to the National Youth Homelessness Scheme.

  20.  Earlier this year Help the Aged released its manifesto for lifetime neighbourhoods, "Towards Common Ground". We believe that the positive duty that the Equality Bill will place on public bodies will go some way to realising some of the goals in this manifesto and ensuring homes and neighbourhoods fit for older people.

SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND ISOLATION

  21.  Recent research by the Social Exclusion Unit found that 29 per cent of older people aged 80 or over were judged to be excluded from important basic services, compared with only 5 per cent of those aged 55 to 59.[181] The final report of the Equalities Review found that people aged over 80 are particularly at risk of suffering multiple exclusion.[182] Social isolation and loneliness are risk factors for poor mental health and suicide.[183]

  22.  Help the Aged believes that the jurisprudence of the ECtHR places issues of social exclusion and isolation squarely in the human rights arena:

    "… the concept of 'private life' is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition. It covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person… Article 8 also protects a right to personal development, and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world."[184]

  23.  Help the Aged hopes that the Equality Bill will tackle social exclusion by promoting consideration for the needs of older people. For instance the shortage of benches, seats and public toilets in public areas particularly disadvantage older groups and can lead to social isolation.

  24.  According to a Help the Aged study:[185]

    — 68 per cent of people agree that there is a shortage of benches and seating in public areas.

    — 74 per cent agree that there is a shortage of public toilets.

  25.  52 per cent of older people say that they do not go out as often as they would like due to the lack of public toilets in their area.[186]

  26.  Education policies which focus largely or exclusively on vocational and work-related aspects of education deny the importance of education to many people in later life, for whom it may be a source of continuing interest and reward. Such limitations also potentially restrict career development and social mobility. A public sector equality duty for age would require reassessment of the curriculum, teaching, marketing and financial support to ensure that older people were offered the same opportunities as younger people.

FINANCIAL SERVICES

  27.  Financial services such as access to banking facilities and travel and motor insurance are essential to avoid social exclusion. Help the Aged submits that these can be viewed in a human rights context in the light of the discussion above regarding social exclusion. In addition the House of Lords has said that "private life" in Art 8 must be understood "as extending to those features which are integral to a person's identity or ability to function socially as a person".[187]

  28.  Services such as travel insurance are essential for ensuring that the fundamental European principle of freedom of movement is open all. Older people are excluded from this by current discriminatory practices.

  29.  The Government has stated that the Equality Bill will tackle age discrimination in the provision of financial services. Help the Aged welcomes this development, but wishes the JCHR to be aware that these are important issues for tackling social exclusion and isolation. It is therefore important that legislation does not water down this commitment or delay its delivery unduly.

EMPLOYMENT

  30.  We note that the Government does not appear to intend to use the Equality Bill to address the issue of age discrimination within the workplace. This is unfortunate as Help the Aged does not believe that the current legislative regime goes far enough in order to guarantee equality in the workplace.

  31.  We believe that the right to work is a fundamental right. We note that ICESCR Article 6 recognises the right to work and that the concept of functioning socially as a person can also be construed as including such a right.

  32.  The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 were introduced to transpose Directive 2000/78/EC. Help the Aged believes that the exemption in Regulation 30 allowing enforced retirement at the age of 65 is unjustifiable discrimination and contrary to the fundamental human rights discussed above.

  33.  Help the Aged believes that the Equality Bill is an opportunity to address this legislative failing and ensure that age is not used as an indicator of an employee's ability. We are also concerned that more needs to be done to stamp out age discrimination in the workplace. A recent survey of jobseekers aged over 50 found that 38 per cent had experienced age discrimination in the workplace and 50 per cent had experienced age discrimination in seeking employment.[188] We believe that Regulation 30 sends out a powerful message to employers which is totally at odds with the aim of the Directive.

  34.  Due to changing demographics and life course patterns people are in education for longer, marrying and starting families later, getting mortgages later, have less in savings and lower pensions. Therefore, working lives need to extend in order to generate increased income, through labour and taxes, to support people in older age. A public sector equality duty for age could encourage longer working life amongst employees of public authorities and those who work for privately owned companies that provide public services, which in turn would help to support the economy and provide increased autonomy to older people. As noted in the Discrimination Law Review green paper: "… many public authorities are major employers—the NHS, for example, is the world's third largest employer—so their employment policies can have a significant effect on participation in and experience of the labour market".[189]

PUBLIC SECTOR EQUALITY DUTY

  35.  The utility of the proposed single equality duty in protecting and promoting human rights will depend to a large extent on the form that it takes. The duty will need to be a strong one, but allow individual public bodies to take appropriate action.

  36.  As major users of public services, a public sector equality duty for age would be extremely beneficial to older people. It would provide a flexible, sustainable framework for assessing the reasoning behind age related practices and for reviewing seemingly neutral policies for their impact on different age groups, effectively helping to root out directly and indirectly discriminatory practices without the need for costly and complex litigation.

  37.  For a positive duty on public bodies to be effective it is important that there is clarity around both the content of the duty and those bodies that it will apply to. It is vital that the confusion that has surrounded s. 6 of the HRA does not hamper the effectiveness of the Equality Bill.[190] Help the Aged believes that it is important that the duty operates on a wider basis than the HRA currently appears to.

  38.  Help the Aged echoes the Joint Committee on Human Rights in calling for the Government to settle the uncertainty surrounding the meaning of public authority within the HRA.[191] We believe that the Equality Bill represents an ideal time to undertake this important work and clarify which bodies will be tasked with promoting equality and protecting human rights.

  39.  Where public sector equality duties covering age exist, research suggests that this has led to increased dialogue with older people, a focus on those issues which affect them most directly and growing evidence of improved outcomes.[192] For example, in Northern Ireland the positive equality duty for age has:

    — Provided "groundbreaking protection against age discrimination".

    — Raised the profile of age issues.

    — Brought together older people's organisations and facilitated working across strands.

    — Positively influenced the culture of public authorities and encouraged them to take a joined-up approach to equality.

    — Raised the issue of multiple identities.[193]

  40.  Help the Aged has identified that the human rights of older people are often breached.[194] Rights such as the right to be free from inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to life, the right to a family and personal life and the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions may be contravened for older people, particularly in health and social care settings.[195]

  41.  A public sector equality duty for age would help to ensure that older people's human rights were better protected and observed because of the obligation on public authorities to consider explicit and implicit unlawful age discrimination in policies and practices and take a proactive approach to reviewing and monitoring discrimination via the complaints and satisfaction procedures.

  42.  The JCHR has stated that "… the existing legislation does not sufficiently protect and promote the rights of older people in healthcare. We recommend that there should be a positive duty on providers of health and residential care to promote equality for older people".[196] We agree. It is therefore essential that these providers are covered by the proposed duty.

  43.  A further example of the value of a positive duty in protecting human rights can be taken from the Crown Prosecution Service. The CPS has published a policy on prosecuting crimes where older people are the victims or witnesses. This will arguably strengthen the protection of rights contained in Article 2 and the Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR. The CPS has taken this action in advance of a positive duty regarding age, but Help the Aged believes that this is a clear example of the type of action that could follow on from the introduction of such a duty.

EXEMPTIONS

  44.  Help the Aged welcomes the Government's commitment to ensuring that the legislation does not prevent the differential provision of products or services for people of different ages where this is justified. Probably the most frequently cited example of this is free bus passes for the over 60s, but there are several other situations. There is a need here to be very cautious with the drafting of the legislation to avoid unintended consequences. This is arguably the case with the issue of access to education under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006. We are aware that training providers, especially Further Education institutions and Community Colleges, have withdrawn courses and cut subsidies that were offered to older learners. Help the Aged believes that concessions for educational courses can be justifiable in certain circumstances and feels that the Government should issue guidance on this area. Legitimate aims could include the promotion of social inclusion, the promotion of health and active ageing and the skilling up of older workers. In order for rights to be properly protected and promoted it is important that exemptions in all aspects of equality legislation are catered for where they are justifiable. We ask the JCHR to see that sufficient priority is given to this issue.

DRAFT DIRECTIVE

  45.  At the same time as the UK is working towards introducing an Equality Bill the EU is considering a draft framework directive on equality outside of the workplace.[197] At this stage it is not clear what support there will be for such a directive, or what form it might ultimately take, so Help the Aged does not believe that it is acceptable to delay the Equality Bill while the directive is finalised. We do believe that this proposed European measure demonstrates that legislation prohibiting discrimination is placed firmly in the field of human rights and that there is a pressing need for such legislation.

DISCRIMINATION BY ASSOCIATION

  46.  The ECJ has recently confirmed that EU law on workplace discrimination protects those who have been discriminated against on grounds of their association with someone who is disabled.[198] It follows that discrimination on grounds of association with someone who is of a particular religion, belief, age or sexual orientation is also prohibited by EU law. This ruling gives employment rights to carers of people with disabilities, but it equally follows that those caring for elderly people will also be protected. Help the Aged believes it is important to include similar protection in the age discrimination provisions in the Equality Bill and would urge the JCHR to recommend that the draft Bill reflects this need.

ENFORCEMENT

  47.  In order to ensure adequate protection of rights it is essential that a robust enforcement mechanism is available. Help the Aged believes that representative actions will be a crucial part of this. It is therefore unfortunate that there will not be provision for representative actions in the Equality Bill. However, we note that the Government will consider this issue further.[199] We would ask the JCHR to monitor progress in this area to ensure that the full protection of human rights that could be achieved by the Equality Bill is realised.






164   T Harding, "Rights at Risk: Older people and human rights", for Help the Aged (2005) Back

165   Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, "Age Discrimination and Equality, Help the Aged Annual Lecture" (2001) Back

166   International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Art 26; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) Art 2 Back

167   Joint Committee on Human Rights, "The Human Rights of Older People in Healthcare" (2006-07) 156-I p. 25 Back

168   ICESCR Art 12(1) Back

169   Spotlight Survey 2008, ICM Research for Help the Aged (2008) Back

170   Help the Aged, "Best Foot Forward" (2005), produced with the University of Plymouth and University College Northampton; Age Concern, "Feet for purpose? The campaign to improve foot care for older people" (2007) Back

171   Healthcare Commission, the Commission for Social Care and Inspection and the Audit Commission, "Living well in later life: a review of the progress against the National Service Framework for Older People" (2006) Back

172   Art 12(1) Back

173   Bensaid v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 205 [47]; see also Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) ECHR 427 [61] where "psychological integrity" is referred to Back

174   R (Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 [74] Back

175   Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38 Back

176   UK Inquiry into Mental Health and Well-Being in Later Life "Promoting mental health and well-being in later life" (2006) p. 10 Back

177   Office for National Statistics, "Suicide rates in the UK 1991-2006" Back

178   UK Inquiry into Mental Health and Well-Being in Later Life "Improving services and support for older people with mental health problems" (2007) p. 4 Back

179   "Improving services and support", p. 8 Back

180   P Bevan & A van Doorn, "Good Practice Briefing on Multiple Needs" (2002) Back

181   Social Exclusion Unit, "A sure start in later life" (2006) Back

182   "Fairness and Freedom: The Final Report of the Equalities Review" (2007) Back

183   National Institute for Mental Health in England, "Making it possible: Improving mental health and well-being in England" (2005) Back

184   Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) ECHR 427 [61] Back

185   B Bytheway, R Ward, C Holland and S Pearce, "Too Old: Older people's accounts of discrimination, exclusion and rejection", a report from the Research on Age Discrimination Project (RoAD), Help the Aged (2007) Back

186   Help the Aged, "Nowhere to Go" (2007) Back

187   R (Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 [9] Back

188   The Age and Employment Network, "Survey of Jobseekers Aged 50+" (2008) Back

189   "Discrimination Law Review-A Framework for Fairness: Proposals for a Single Equality Bill for Great Britain" (2007) [5.25] Back

190   See the discussion in Joint Committee on Human Rights, "The Meaning of Public Authority under the Human Rights Act" (2006-07) 77; YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] UKHL 27 Back

191   "The Meaning of Public Authority under the Human Rights Act" [108] Back

192   C O'Cinnedie, "Taking Equal Opportunities Seriously: the extension of positive duties to promote equality", for the Equality and Diversity Forum (2004) Back

193   Age Concern, "Tackling Age Discrimination Beyond the Workplace: Age Concern Seminar Series" (July 2006); See also, Age Concern, "Age of equality? Outlawing age discrimination beyond the workplace" (May 2007) Back

194   T Harding, "Rights at Risk: Older people and human rights", for Help the Aged (2005) Back

195   Joint Committee on Human Rights, "The Human Rights of Older People in Healthcare" (2006-07) 156-I Back

196   Joint Committee on Human Rights, "The Human Rights of Older People in Healthcare" (2006-07) 156-I p. 25 Back

197   Commission (EC), "Proposal for a Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation" COM (2008) 426 final, 7 July 2008 Back

198   Case C-303/06 Coleman v Attridge Law [2008] 3 CMLR 27 Back

199   "The Equality Bill-Government response to the Consultation" (Cm 7454, 2008), p. 6 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 12 November 2009