Enhancing Parliament's role in relation to human rights judgments - Human Rights Joint Committee Contents


Letter from the Chair of the Committee to Rt Hon Alan Johnson MP, Home Secretary, dated 11 June 2009

LIBERTY AND OTHERS V UNITED KINGDOM (APP NO 58243/00, 1 JULY 2008)

  The Joint Committee on Human Rights is continuing its practice of reviewing the implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) finding the UK to be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

  I am writing to inquire about the Government's response to the judgment in Liberty and others v United Kingdom, which became final on 1 October 2008. In Liberty and others, the Court found that the interception of the applicants' communications under the Interception of Communications Act 1985 (repealed by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA)) breached the right to respect for private life and correspondence. It held:

    The Court does not consider that the domestic law at the relevant time indicated with sufficient clarity, so as to provide adequate protection against abuse of power, the scope or manner of exercise of the very wide discretion conferred on the State to intercept and examine external communications. In particular, it did not, as required by the Court's case-law, set out in a form accessible to the public any indication of the procedure to be followed for selecting for examination, sharing, storing and destroying intercepted material. The interference with the applicants' rights under Article 8 was not, therefore, "in accordance with the law". (para 69)

  On 17 April 2009, the then Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith MP launched a review of and public consultation on RIPA.[11] The consultation, which includes new draft Codes of Practice, closes on 10 July 2009.

  I would be grateful for your response to the following questions:

    1. What steps, if any, does the Government intend to take to give effect to the ECtHR's decision in Liberty and others?

    2. Is the Government satisfied that the legal deficiencies identified by the ECtHR in Liberty and others have been rectified by repeal of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 and the enactment of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and its Code of Practice?

    3. In particular, is the Government satisfied that publicly accessible information on the current procedure for "selecting for examination, sharing, storing and destroying intercepted material" is available, and if so, where can it be found?

    4. To what extent will Government work following on from its consultation on RIPA aim to implement the ECtHR's decision in Liberty and others?

  In addition, please provide us with copies of the Government's submissions to the Committee of Ministers and ensure that we continue to be updated as further information is provided.

11 June 2009






11   Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000: Consolidating Orders and Codes of Practice, Home Office, April 2009. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 26 March 2010