Draft House of Lords Reform Bill - Draft House of Lords Reform Bill Joint Committee Contents



Edward Choi

I would like to comment regarding the proposed House of Lords reforms. I believe that there should not be any radical reforms to the House of Lords. The House of Lords have been an important part of the British political (and legal) heritage for many years and is an important part of the British culture. Any reforms would destroy part of the English/British culture.

The House of Commons is already an elected legislature. The House of Lords and the monarch have long been a protection of the constitution, although lately that view has been largely disputed. Through most of England's history, England (and Britain) had succeed with the current structure. The focus was not solely on an elected parliament, but a combination of an elected house and other protections. A reform in the way the government is currently proposing seems to be "Americanizing" the British system. The American system is where everything (including judges) is elected, that is not the sole system every country should operate. There are, of course, positives and negatives to each system which should be analyzed. Preserving our culture, and keeping a system that works simply makes sense. It's a system where there is democracy and where there are protections in place.

Unlike the elected House of Commons, the term of peers in the House of Lords is longer. It allows peers to view issues long term, and not just with a view to the next election. Without elections, peers in the House of Lords would not be as focused on personal interests for the next elections, as does the House of Commons. That is important. The House of Lords can be used to correct the short-sighted House of Commons and provide some longer-term insight into matters, as does the monarch.

Should House of Lords reform go through, I would strongly recommend preserving Church of England representatives in the house. This nation is a Christian nation and had been that way throughout its history. Long battles have been fought to preserve this, and this tradition and protection should not be destroyed. I do not believe other faiths should be represented as the Church of England is the national religion. This view is in line with many other countries where a dominant religion is in place. Preserving and building upon our Christian heritage is important both culturally and spiritually.

29 November 2011


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 23 April 2012