Drawing special attention to: Office of the Renewable Fuels Agency (Dissolution and Transfer of Functions) Order 2011 (S.I 2010/493) - Statutory Instruments Joint Committee Contents


Instruments reported



At its meeting on 4 May 2011 the Committee scrutinised a number of Instruments in accordance with Standing Orders. It was agreed that the special attention of both Houses should be drawn to one of those considered. The Instrument and the ground for reporting it is given below. The relevant Departmental memorandum is published as an appendix to this report.

1   S.I. 2011/493: Reported for requiring elucidation

Office of the Renewable Fuels Agency (Dissolution and Transfer of Functions) Order 2011 (S.I 2010/493)


1.1  The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to this Order on the grounds that it requires elucidation in one respect.

1.2  The Order is made by the Secretary of State for Transport, transfers the functions of the Renewal of Fuels Agency to the Secretary of State and dissolves it. The enabling power is section 125C(1), (4), (5) and (6) of the Energy Act 2004. It is stated in the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum, with commendable openness, that for purposes of timing the Order omits a number of consequential changes to legislation (tidying up redundant references) that one might expect to see included, the reason being that section 125C(8) of the 2004 Act provides (so far as is relevant) that such an order — though normally subject to negative resolution procedure — is subject to the affirmative resolution procedure if it modifies primary legislation.

1.3  The Committee, which was concerned with the possibility that a conceptually incomplete instrument might have been made for the sole purpose of avoiding affirmative procedure, asked for details of the omitted legislation and for amplification of the timing problems.

1.4  In a memorandum printed as the Appendix, the Department for Transport specifically identifies the legislation, and how it is planned to be tidied up, and explains the timing considerations in greater detail. The Committee is satisfied that the omissions give rise neither to incomplete structure nor incomplete effect; rather they leave a number of spent provisions, which are appropriately described as redundant and are not expected to remain as excrescences for an unacceptable period. The Committee accordingly reports the Order as requiring the elucidation further provided in the Department's memorandum.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 10 May 2011