Twenty-second Report of Session 2012-13 - Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Contents


Appendix 2


S.I. 2013/228: memorandum from the Department for Transport


Rights of Passengers in Bus and Coach Transport (Exemptions) Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/228)


1.  By a letter dated 27th February 2013 the Committee has asked for a memorandum on the following point:

Explain how Community legislation permits the exemptions provided by regulation 4(1)(a) and (b), given that the scope of Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No. 181/2011 is limited to services that not only have at least one scheduled stop in territory outside the European Union but also operate to a significant part in such territory.

2.  Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) No.181/2011 allows Member States to exempt from the application of the Regulation "particular regular services because a significant part of such regular services, including at least one scheduled stop, is operated outside the Union".

3.  The Department takes the view that "significant", construed in the context of the EU Regulation, means "not insignificant". Having regard to the fact that the exemption is in respect of particular services and that any commercial service operating to Switzerland or Croatia would be likely to be destined for a major conurbation there, as evidenced by those services that are currently operated, we took the view that such a service would necessarily involve more than an "insignificant" part of the journey being operated in the territory concerned. Even if the service were operated to a place not far from the border, if the destination were a place of some size, which we thought would almost certainly be the case, the final leg of the journey would on this reading be inherently a "significant part" of the journey. Our view that significance is not to be construed solely with reference to the distance travelled within the country is reinforced by the fact that "one scheduled stop" is the only additional mandatory requirement.

4.  In relation to the requirement for at least one scheduled stop, we took the view that this could be the final stop; this construction still gives the provision a purpose as it would prevent an exemption being given to a service that merely passed through a territory without stopping.

5.  Accordingly the Department remains of the view that Article 2(5) of the EU Regulation permits the exemptions provided for in regulation 4(1)(a) and (b) of the domestic Regulations.

6.  The exemptions are time limited and the government will keep their operation under review. If it became apparent that services were being operated to destinations of no significance in Switzerland purely in order to take advantage of the exemption, the government would consider whether it should take any action. The position is unlikely to arise in relation to Croatia as it joins the EU on 1st July. The government is aware of a commercial service currently operating to Split, via Zagreb, but it considers this clearly meets the test in the Regulation.

Department for Transport

4 March 2013


 
previous page contents


© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Prepared 19 March 2013