Drawing special attention to nine Statutory Instruments. - Statutory Instruments Joint Committee Contents


2 S.I. 2012/605: Reported for defective drafting


Town and Country Planning (Tree Preservation) (England) Regulations 2012 (S.I. 2012/605)


2.1 The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to these Regulations on the ground that they are defectively drafted in two respects.

2.2 The Regulations provide a new system of tree preservation orders in England.

2.3 Regulation 2(1) defines "authority" as a "local planning authority making, or having functions under," a tree preservation order. Regulation 5(3) requires authorities to make tree preservation orders available for inspection once made, and adds "and where an order is made on behalf of an authority, it shall be made available for inspection also at the offices of the authority on whose behalf it was made". The Committee asked the Department for Communities and Local Government when an order might be made "on behalf of" an authority, having regard to the definition of "authority". In a memorandum printed at Appendix 2 the Department explains that the reference to an order made on behalf of an authority is intended to refer to the power conferred on the Secretary of State by section 202 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, under which the Secretary of State may make tree preservation orders. The Department goes on to admit, however, that the Regulations fail to make adequate provision for the case where an order is made by the Secretary of State; the Department accepts that the Regulations require modification to address that case thoroughly, but adds that since the Secretary of State has not used these powers and expects to do so only exceptionally, the modifications are not urgent. Although the point attracted the Committee's attention in relation to the express reference in regulation 5(3) to the making of an order on behalf of an authority, the problem as admitted by the Department is that the case for which that reference is designed is not provided for adequately elsewhere in the Regulations; accordingly the Committee reports the Regulations for defective drafting, acknowledged by the Department.

2.4 Regulations 5(3) and 8 require documents to be made available for inspection "free of charge". Other regulations refer to documents made available in accordance with regulation 5, which attracts the requirement that inspection be "free of charge". Regulation 12(2), however, requires a register of proceedings under the Regulations to be made available for inspection but does not specify "free of charge". The Committee asked the Department to explain the apparent inconsistency, and drew attention to general powers under which local authorities may levy charges. In its memorandum the Department explains that the general powers referred to by the Committee do not confer a power to charge in this case and adds that although there is specific power to allow fees to be charged in these circumstances it has not been exercised. The Department therefore admits that the words "free of charge" are unnecessary and undertakes to remove them "at the earliest legislative opportunity". The Committee accordingly reports regulations 5(3) and 8 for defective drafting, acknowledged by the Department.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2012
Prepared 26 June 2012