APPENDIX L: SCRUTINY RESERVE RESOLUTION
RELATING TO THE WORK OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COMMITTEE
(30 March 2010)
The House has resolved:
That
(1) Subject to paragraph (5) below, no Minister
of the Crown shall give agreement in the Council or the European
Council in relation to any document subject to the scrutiny of
the European Union Committee in accordance with its terms of reference,
while the document remains subject to scrutiny.
(2) A document remains subject to scrutiny if
(a) the European Union Committee has made a report
in relation to the document to the House for debate, but the debate
has not yet taken place; or
(b) in any case, the Committee has not indicated
that it has completed its scrutiny.
(3) Agreement in relation to a document means
agreement whether or not a formal vote is taken, and includes
in particular
(a) agreement to a programme, plan or recommendation
for European Union legislation;
(b) political agreement;
(c) agreement to a general approach;
(d) in the case of a proposal on which the Council
acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 289(1)
of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the ordinary
legislative procedure), agreement to the Council's position at
first reading, to its position at second reading, or to a joint
text; and
(e) in the case of a proposal on which the Council
acts in accordance with Article 289(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union (a special legislative procedure), agreement
to a Council position.
(4) Where the Council acts by unanimity, abstention
shall be treated as giving agreement.
(5) The Minister concerned may give agreement
in relation to a document which remains subject to scrutiny
(a) if he considers that it is confidential,
routine or trivial, or is substantially the same as a proposal
on which scrutiny has been completed;
(b) if the European Union Committee has indicated
that agreement need not be withheld pending completion of scrutiny;
or
(c) if the Minister decides that, for special
reasons, agreement should be given; but he must explain his reasons
i. in every such case, to the European Union
Committee at the first opportunity after reaching his decision;
and
ii. if that Committee has made a report
for debate in the House, to the House at the opening of the debate
on the report.
|