Stages of a public bill~~~8
8.01 Public bills in the House of Lords have
five main stages:
and first reading;
reading and passing.
Further stages may also be necessary as a result
of communications between the two Houses (see paragraphs 8.158-8.178).
Successive stages of a bill to
be taken on different days~
8.02 Under SO 46, no two stages of a bill may
be taken on one day, except if a bill is not amended in Committee
of the whole House, in which case the report stage may be taken
immediately thereafter. So, if it is intended to take more than
one stage of a bill on one day, other than the report stage of
a bill which has not been amended in Committee of the whole House,
SO 46 must be suspended or dispensed with; SO 86 requires that
notice of this must be given.
8.03 SO 86 also provides that on occasions of
grave national emergency a bill may be passed through all its
stages on one day without notice~. In such cases SOs 46 and 86
are read at the Table by the Clerk and a resolution is moved that
it is essential for reasons of national security that a bill or
bills should immediately be proceeded with and that the provisions
of SO 46 should be dispensed with to enable the House to proceed
that day with every stage of the bill or bills which it thinks
Recommended minimum intervals
between the stages of a bill~
8.04 The following minimum intervals~~ between
stages of public bills should be observed:
(a) two weekends between the first reading (whether
of a new bill or one brought from the Commons) and the debate
on second reading;
(b) fourteen days between second reading and
the start of the committee stage;
(c) on all bills of considerable length and complexity,
fourteen days between the end of the committee stage and the start
of the report stage;
(d) three sitting days between the end of the
report stage and third reading.
8.05 When these minimum intervals are departed
from, notice is given by means of a § against the bill in
House of Lords Business. However, such notice is not required
when SO 46 has been suspended or dispensed with.
8.06 For any legislation subject to expedited
procedures ("fast-tracked") the explanatory notes accompanying
the legislation will contain a full explanation of the reasons
for using a fast-track procedure.
8.07 Reasonable notice should whenever possible
be given for consideration of Commons amendments, taking into
account the number and scale of amendments and the availability
of papers relating to them.
8.08 Subject to the procedure described in the
following paragraph, any public bill which does not receive Royal
Assent in the session in which it is introduced falls at the end
of that session.
8.09 The two Houses have agreed that government
public bills can be "carried over" from one session
to the next in the same way as private and hybrid bills, if they
have not left the House in which they originated.
In the Lords:
of bills for carry-over is settled by informal discussion through
the usual channels;
are carried over by ad hoc motions;
· a Commons
bill carried over in the Commons is treated in the same way as
any other bill brought from the Commons;
· a bill
that has been carried over falls if it does not reach the statute
book by the end of the session following that in which it was
8.10 The carry-over procedure does not apply
over a dissolution.
Introduction and first reading~~~
8.11 Any member may introduce a bill without
notice and without leave.
8.12 A member wishing to introduce a bill should
inform the Legislation Office not later than the working day before
the day of introduction, and should discuss the bill with the
Office in draft. The final text must be handed in to the Office
8.13 At the start of each session a ballot is
conducted to determine the order in which private members' bills
handed in on the day of State Opening receive their first readings
on subsequent days. To enter the ballot a member must hand in
the final text of the bill to the Legislation Office no later
than the rising of the House on the day of State Opening. It is
desirable for a member who wishes to enter the ballot to discuss
the draft with the office well before the day of State Opening.
A member may enter only one bill into the ballot, and a member
may not submit for entry to the ballot a bill of identical or
substantially similar effect to a bill already entered for the
ballot. A member may use a first reading "slot" determined
by the ballot to introduce only the bill entered into the ballot.
The "slot" may not be handed to another member.
8.14 The powers of the House to legislate on
devolved matters are unaffected by the devolution legislation.
8.15 The government have stated that "there
would be instances where it would be more convenient for legislation
on devolved matters to be passed by the United Kingdom Parliament,
[though] Westminster would not normally legislate with regard
to matters within the competence of the [devolved] parliament
without the consent of that parliament".
When the Scottish Parliament, the National Assembly for Wales
or the Northern Ireland Assembly has passed (or rejected) a Legislative
Consent Motion on a bill before the House, ~~~this is indicated
in the list of bills in progress in House of Lords Business.
Procedure on introduction: Lords
8.16 A member who wishes to present a bill rises
at the beginning of public business after oral questions or (exceptionally)
at the end of public business immediately before the adjournment
of the House,
and introduces the bill by saying:
"My Lords, I beg to introduce
a bill to [long title of bill]. I beg to move that this bill be
now read a first time."
8.17 ~~The Question is put from the Woolsack.
The first reading of a bill is agreed to without dissent or debate,
both as a matter of courtesy and because the House usually has
no knowledge of the bill until it is published.
8.18 A bill may be introduced by a member on
behalf of another member.
Procedure on introduction: Commons
8.19 A bill which has been introduced in the
Commons and which has passed through all its stages in that House
is brought to the Lords by a Commons Clerk with a message stating
that the Commons have passed the bill. The message is read by
the Clerk at the Table as soon as the item of business in progress
has ended, and the first reading of the bill (whether a government
bill or a private member's bill) is moved immediately by a government
8.20 As with Lords bills, the first reading of
a bill brought from the Commons is agreed to without discussion,
both as a matter of courtesy to the Commons and because at this
stage no member has formally taken charge of it.
8.21 The member taking charge of a Commons bill
should inform the Public Bill Office.
Bills brought up and printed
when Lords not sitting~
8.22 A bill passed by the Commons may be carried
up to the Lords when the Lords are not sitting. Under SO 50 it
is deemed to have been brought from the Commons on that day and
the bill and any explanatory notes may be published before first
reading if this is for the convenience of the House.
Publishing of bills and explanatory
8.23 After the first reading of a bill an order
is made for the bill and any explanatory notes to be published.
By convention, Consolidated Fund Bills~ and Appropriation Bills~
are not printed for the Lords, nor are provisional order confirmation
bills unless subsequently amended on consideration on report.
On occasion other bills may not be republished, including bills
which are to be taken through the House urgently.
8.24 A bill introduced in the Lords is endorsed
with the name of the member of the House who has introduced it.
It is not the practice to add other names. A bill brought from
the Commons is not endorsed with the name of the member taking
charge of the bill.
8.25 For most government bills explanatory notes
are produced by the responsible department at the time the bill
is introduced. Such notes cover the financial and manpower implications
of the bill and any regulatory aspects (though any regulatory
appraisal is usually produced separately). Notes must be neutral
in tone and must not seek to promote the bill or the policy underlying
Explanatory notes are also produced for Commons amendments to
Lords bills. In some cases departments may prepare notes for private
members' bills, with the consent of the member in charge of the
bill, whose authority must be communicated to the Legislation
Office before the notes can be published. Explanatory notes may
also be produced by private members themselves: members should
submit a draft to the Legislation Office before introduction in
order to ensure that these are in proper form.
European Convention on Human
8.26 Under s. 19 of the Human Rights Act 1998~
the minister in charge of a government bill must make a statement
before second reading as to whether in his or her view the provisions
of the bill are compatible with the European Convention on Human
Rights, and publish the statement in such manner as he or she
This requirement extends to provisional order confirmation bills.
The statement is usually set out on the cover page of a bill as
first printed for each House; where bills are not printed for
the Lords the statement is publicised by means of a written statement.
8.27 The minister who makes the statement should
under normal circumstances move the second reading of the bill.
If that minister is unable to do so, another minister should do
so on the basis that he or she is acting on behalf of the minister
who has made the statement.
Notice of subsequent stages
8.28 The member who is in charge of a bill gives
notice of a date for second reading, and for the stages thereafter,
in House of Lords Business.
8.29 Any member may move any stage of a bill
on behalf of the member in charge of the bill. Bills once introduced
are in the possession of the House and not in the sole ownership
of the member in charge.
Government and private members'
8.30 There is no procedural distinction between
bills sponsored by a minister and those introduced by other members
of the House, save in respect of carry-over and human rights statements.
In practice the House normally accords priority to proceedings
on government bills except where private members' bills are not
expected to give rise to debate. But there is no concept of government
or private members' "time" in the Lords, nor any specific
time when government or private members' bills are taken.
Commons bills not taken up within
twelve sitting days~
8.31 Under SO 49, if a bill brought up from the
Commons remains for twelve sitting days without any member having
given notice of a date for second reading, it cannot be proceeded
with except after eight days' notice. Motions to dispense with
SO 49 have been agreed to.
Withdrawal of bills~~
8.32 A Commons bill may not be withdrawn at any
stage in the House of Lords.
8.33 At any time after first reading, a bill
originating in the House of Lords may, with the agreement of the
House, be withdrawn by the Lord who presented it. This may be
achieved by the member in charge of the bill, having moved the
motion for a stage of the bill, begging leave to withdraw that
motion. Unanimous leave of the House is required for any motion
to be withdrawn, so that a single dissenting voice prevents leave
being given and the Question must in that case be put and decided.
The granting of leave to withdraw a stage of a bill is treated
as withdrawal of the bill, unless the member in charge of the
bill indicates that he intends to proceed with the bill on another
8.34 If a bill is between stages, a separate
motion, of which notice is given, should be tabled, "That
the bill be withdrawn". Such a motion does not require
Delegated Powers and Regulatory
8.35 All bills other than consolidation, money
and supply bills are considered by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory
Reform Committee, which reports to the House in relation to any
delegated powers they contain. These reports are highlighted by
means of an italic note against a bill in House of Lords Business.
The committee aims to report before the committee stage begins,
though the House is under no obligation to delay proceedings if
the committee has not reported by that time. If time allows, the
committee may also report on government amendments, if these involve
significant delegated powers.
8.36 The Constitution Committee examines the
constitutional implications of all public bills coming before
the House. Constitution Committee reports on public bills may
be highlighted by means of an italic note against a bill in House
of Lords Business.
8.37 Government bills ~which are published in
draft may be considered and reported on, before they are introduced,
by a select or joint committee appointed for that purpose. At
least 3-4 months (excluding long recesses) is normally required
to hear evidence and report. Such "pre-legislative scrutiny"
does not have the effect of eliminating any stages when the bill
itself is considered by the House.
8.38 The second reading is the stage at which
the general principles of the bill are considered. The member
in charge of the bill says "My Lords, I beg to move that
this bill be now read a second time" and makes the case
for the bill. In debate, other members of the House may indicate,
in general terms, how the bill might be amended, but discussion
of points of detail should normally be left to the committee stage.
Opposition to second reading~~
8.39 A bill may be opposed on second reading
by an amendment to the effect that "this House declines to
give the bill a second reading". The amendment may add a
reason (a "reasoned amendment"). The agreement of the
House to such an amendment, with or without a reason, means automatic
rejection of the bill. The question as amended is not put, and
the bill is removed from the list of bills in progress in House
of Lords Business.
8.40 It is possible to oppose the motion "That
this bill be now read a second time", without tabling an
amendment, but this is uncommon, because notice of such opposition,
which is desirable in the interests of good order, cannot be given
on the order paper.
Second reading agreed to with
8.41 Amendments may be moved which do not seek
to negative the second reading but invite the House to put on
record a particular point of view in agreeing to the second reading.
8.42 Notice is required on the order paper of
any amendment to the motion for second reading. If notice has
been given of more than one amendment, they are dealt with in
the order in which they relate to the motion, or, if they relate
to the same place in the motion, in the order in which they were
tabled. In such cases it is usual for the whole debate to take
place on the first amendment, and for the members who tabled the
other amendments to speak in this debate. When the debate is concluded,
the Question is put on each amendment successively, or on so many
of them as need to be disposed of before a positive decision is
reached. The Question on the original motion or on the original
motion as amended is then finally put and decided.
Motion for adjournment of second
8.43 A second reading debate may be adjourned,
with or without notice or reasons. A motion to adjourn the debate,
if agreed to, does not prevent the motion for the second reading
being put down for a subsequent day.
Consideration in a Second Reading
8.44 Second reading debates on certain Law Commission
bills are held in the Moses Room.
Following first reading, a motion is tabled, with at least three
sitting days' notice, to refer the bill to a "Second Reading
Committee". The committee, which has unlimited membership,
debates the bill, and reports to the House that it has considered
the bill. The second reading motion is then normally taken without
debate in the House, though it remains possible, in the event
of opposition, for amendments to be tabled or a vote to take place
on the motion. Law Commission bills are normally committed to
a special public bill committee (see below).
8.45 After second reading, either immediately
or at a later date, bills are committed to a committee on a motion
in the name of the member in charge of the bill. Bills are usually
committed to a Committee of the whole House or a Grand Committee.
The forms of words are "That this bill be committed to
a Committee of the whole House" or "to a Grand
8.46 In certain cases bills may be committed
to other types of committee. These include special public bill
committees and select committees, which are described at paragraphs
8.47 The House sometimes wishes, after committing
a bill to one kind of committee, to commit it to another instead.
The motion is "That the order of commitment of [date] committing
the bill to an [original committee] be discharged and that the
bill be committed to a [new committee]."
8.48 In order to save the time of the House,
supply bills and money bills are not usually committed. This is
the invariable practice in the case of supply bills and the normal
practice for money bills~.
Immediately after the second reading
the member in charge of the bill moves "That this bill
be not committed" and the Question is put. If it is agreed
to, the next stage is third reading. A bill which has not been
committed is described as having had its committee stage "negatived".
8.49 Instructions to any committee on a bill
may be moved after the second reading.
8.50 Instructions may be either mandatory or
permissive. The most common mandatory instruction directs the
committee to consider the clauses and Schedules in an order other
than that of the bill. Permissive instructions enable a committee
to do something that it could not otherwise do, such as divide
a bill into two.
8.51 Instructions to extend the scope of a bill
(that is, to make admissible amendments which would otherwise
be excluded by the rules of relevance) are not in order.
Tabling of amendments~
8.52 Amendments may be moved in committee, on
report and on third reading. The following section describes the
general procedure for dealing with amendments. Issues specific
to particular stages are described in the sections relating to
8.53 Amendments may be tabled in the Legislation
Office at any time after second reading. When the second reading
and committee stages are expected to take place on the same day,
amendments are accepted before second reading. The late tabling
of amendments is strongly deprecated since members have only a
limited time to consider them and, if necessary, move amendments
8.54 Amendments which are intended to be published
the next working day should be tabled between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.
on Mondays to Thursdays, and 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on Fridays. Amendments
may be tabled with the duty Clerk during recesses, between 10
a.m. and 4 p.m.
Admissibility of amendments~~
8.55 The House observes the following general
rules regarding the admissibility of amendments:
must be relevant to the subject matter of the bill
and amendments to a clause or Schedule must be relevant to the
clause or Schedule to which they are proposed;~
proposed at committee or any other stage must not be inconsistent
with a previous decision taken at that stage,
except where alternative amendments are proposed to the same place
in the bill;
to a Schedule are not in order if they go beyond the scope of,
or are contrary to, the relevant clause which has been agreed
to the long title~ are not in order unless they are to rectify
a mistake in the original title, to restate the title more clearly
or to reflect amendments to the bill which are relevant to the
bill but not covered by the former long title;
headings, and headings placed above parts of the bill or above
groups of clauses, are technically not part of the bill and so
are not open to amendment. Punctuation is also technically not
part of the bill.
8.56 The Legislation Office advises on whether
an amendment is admissible and it is expected that this advice
will be taken. ~If a member insists on tabling an amendment which
the Legislation Office has advised is inadmissible, that office
writes to the Leader of the House, copying the advice to the other
Leaders, the Chief Whips and the Convenor. The Leader of the House
draws the House's attention to the advice when the amendment is
called, and asks the House to endorse the advice of the Legislation
Office. The reason for this is that the admissibility of an amendment
can ultimately be decided only by the House itself, there being
no authority that can in advance rule an amendment out of order.
8.57 Tabling amendments to bills originating
in the House of Commons is unprofitable if such amendments appear
to be material and intolerable infringements of Commons financial
privilege~~, in that they impose a charge not covered by the terms
of the money or Ways and Means resolutions in the Commons, unless
there is reason to believe that the Commons will pass a supplementary
financial resolution (see paragraph 8.181). Advice may be obtained
from the Legislation Office.
Publishing of amendments
8.58 All amendments to a particular bill tabled
on the same day are published overnight and are not numbered at
this stage. The names of members supporting an amendment appear
above it, up to a maximum of four names, or five if the member
in charge of the bill adds his or her name.
Rules of marshalling~~
8.59 Subject to the rules listed below, amendments
are published in the order of their page, line and word references
in the bill, taking account of any instruction that has been tabled.
The rules are as follows:
to the preamble~~ and the long title~, in that order, are taken
to leave out words take precedence over amendments to leave out
the same words and insert others;
to leave out a shorter block of text (e.g. lines 1-5) take precedence
over amendments to leave out a longer block of text (e.g. lines
to leave out any block of text other than a complete clause or
Schedule come before amendments to that text;
to a clause or Schedule are considered before an amendment to
leave out a clause or Schedule and substitute another;
each clause and Schedule must be stood part of the bill in committee,
an amendment to leave out a clause or Schedule in committee is
not technically an amendment, but a statement of intention to
oppose the Question that the clause or Schedule stand part of
the bill. Notice is usually given of such intention and printed
in italics, without being numbered, on the marshalled list. On
report and third reading an intention to leave out a clause or
Schedule is indicated by tabling an amendment;
Question that the clause or Schedule stand part of the bill or
(on report or third reading) an amendment to leave out the clause
or Schedule is considered after all amendments to the clause or
Schedule (including an amendment to leave out the clause or Schedule
and substitute another);
to divide a clause or Schedule are taken after the clause or Schedule
has been stood part of the bill;
to transpose a clause or clauses, or part of a clause or Schedule,
to another place in the bill are taken after the clause or Schedule
(or the last of the affected clauses or Schedules) has been stood
part of the bill;
to insert a new clause are considered at the place in the bill
where it is proposed that the new clause is to be inserted;
to amendments are considered immediately after the Question on
the original amendment has been put for the first time, in the
order in which they relate to the text of the original amendment,
and are disposed of before the Question on the original amendment,
or the original amendment as amended, is finally put;
alternative amendments are tabled to the same place in the bill,
they are marshalled in the order in which they are tabled, except
that priority is given to an amendment tabled by the member in
charge of the bill. A decision may be taken on each in turn, even
if the second amendment is in substitution for the first amendment
to which the committee has already agreed.
8.60 Accordingly amendments are marshalled as
1. Page 1, line 5, leave out subsection (1)
2. Page 1, line 5, leave out subsection (1) and
insert "(1) "
3. Page 1, line 6, leave out "word"
4. Page 1, line 6, leave out "word"
and insert "words"
5. Page 1, line 6, after "word" insert
6. Page 1, line 7, leave out "4" and
7. Page 1, line 7, leave out "4" and
8. Page 1, line 7, leave out "4" and
(If amendment 6 is agreed to, the Question is put
on amendment 7 thus:
"Page 1, line 7, leave out "5" and
and on amendment 8 thus:
"Page 1, line 7, leave out "5" [or
"6"] and insert "7"".)
9. Leave out Clause 1 and insert the following
new Clause"[text of new Clause]"
10. Lord A gives notice of his intention to
oppose the Question that Clause 1 stand part of the bill [at
Leave out Clause 1 [at report or third reading]
11. Transpose Clause 1 to after Clause 46
AT COMMITTEE AND REPORT STAGES
8.61 Two working days before consideration of
a bill is due to take place, the various amendments are numbered
and published as a "marshalled list", arranged in the
order they will be considered, taking account of any instruction.
If further amendments are tabled on the day before that appointed
for consideration they are published on supplementary sheets or
are incorporated in a revised marshalled list. Any amendments
not previously published, and amendments which have been altered
since they were last published, are marked with a on the marshalled
list, but are otherwise treated identically to other amendments.
When the stage is not completed in one day, further amendments
may be tabled, which are published on sheets supplementary to
the marshalled list and on further marshalled lists.
AT THIRD READING
8.62 Marshalled lists for third reading are produced
in the same way as those for committee and report, except that
amendments must be tabled by the working day before the stage.
The list is usually published on the day of the stage.
8.63 Whenever possible, amendments should be
tabled in time for inclusion in the marshalled list. However,
except on third reading, it is in order to move, as manuscript
amendments, amendments of which notice has not been given on the
marshalled list or on a supplementary sheet. Occasionally a manuscript
amendment is justified, even in the course of debate, for instance
to correct an amendment already tabled or when an amendment under
consideration is objected to and it is clear that with slight
alteration of language it would become acceptable. However, manuscript
amendments should rarely be moved, since other members of the
House will not have had an opportunity to consider them and may
be deprived of the opportunity of moving amendments to them.
8.64 When a manuscript amendment is moved, the
text of the amendment is read out both by the mover and by the
Lord on the Woolsack or in the Chair when putting the Question,
unless the House or committee otherwise directs.
Procedure on amendments~
8.65 There is no selection of amendments. The
clauses in the bill are proceeded with in sequence, unless an
instruction varying the sequence has been agreed to. Each amendment
on the marshalled list and each manuscript amendment is called
in turn by the Lord on the Woolsack or in the Chair, subject only
to pre-emption (see paragraph 8.69). An amendment which has been
tabled need not be moved, but if none of the members named as
supporters of the amendment moves it any other member may do so.~
8.66 After the member moving the amendment has
spoken the Lord on the Woolsack or in the Chair puts the text
of the amendment to the House or the committee. The debate on
the amendment follows, at the end of which the member who has
moved the amendment either begs leave to withdraw it or invites
the House or committee to agree to it. The Lord on the Woolsack
or in the Chair must put the Question that the amendment be agreed
to if the member who has moved the amendment does not beg leave
to withdraw, or if leave to withdraw is not unanimous.
8.67 Amendments to amendments are taken after
the original amendment has been moved and put for the first time.
When any such amendments have been disposed of, the debate on
the original amendment, or the original amendment as amended,
may be resumed.
8.68 If a member whose amendment is called wishes
to speak, other than to say "Not moved", he or she must
move the amendment~, and the Lord on the Woolsack or in the Chair
must put it to the House or committee. This allows others to speak
too. It is not in order to make a detailed speech and then to
say "Not moved".
8.69 If an amendment has been pre-empted~ by
one previously agreed to by the House, e.g. because the text proposed
to be amended has been left out of the bill, the amendment will
not be called. The Lord on the Woolsack or in the Chair alerts
the House to this possibility, normally when putting the text
of the pre-empting amendment after it has been moved, but sometimes
(e.g. when the amendment is a key one which is expected to be
divided on) when calling the pre-empting amendment.
Grouping of amendments~~
8.70 In order to avoid repetition, related amendments
are often grouped and debated together. Lists of such groupings
are prepared by agreement between the members tabling the amendments
and the Government Whips' Office, and are made available to the
House. Groupings are informal and not binding. A member may speak
to a group of amendments (not necessarily consecutive or in his
or her own name) when the first amendment in the group is called.
Usually only the first amendment in a group is moved and the rest
are merely spoken to in the debate on the first amendment, even
though it may be a minor or paving amendment. But each amendment
in the group must be called, moved (if desired) and disposed of
separately at its place in the marshalled list. Proceedings on
later amendments in a group are often formal but further debate
may take place and an amendment previously debated with others
in a group may be moved at its place in the bill.
When proceedings on later amendments in a group are formal, the
amendments are moved as follows:
"My Lords, I have already
spoken to this amendment. I beg to move."
8.71 If the first amendment in a group is agreed
to, it does not follow that the other amendments in the group
will all be agreed to, unless they are directly consequential.
It is a matter for the House or committee to judge in each case
how the decision on the first amendment affects the others.
EFFECT OF GROUPINGS ON THIRD READING AMENDMENTS
8.72 A member who believes that an amendment
at committee or report stage has been wrongly grouped should make
this clear in debate. Otherwise, under the rule against reopening
at third reading an issue which has previously been decided, members
may be precluded from retabling the same or very similar amendments
at third reading~, if another amendment in the group was voted
on or negatived at committee or report stage (see paragraph 8.146).
Amendments moved en bloc
8.73 Amendments may be moved en bloc provided
appear consecutively on the marshalled list;
committee stage, they all relate to the same clause or Schedule;
have already been spoken to; and
· no member
8.74 If any member objects to amendments being
moved en bloc they must be moved separately to the extent
desired. A vote cannot take place on amendments moved en bloc.
Amendments may not be withdrawn en bloc.
PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE
OF THE WHOLE HOUSE~
8.75 A Committee of the whole House consists,
as its name implies, of all the members of the House. It is, in
fact, the House itself in a less formal guise, presided over by
and conducting its business according to more flexible rules of
8.76 The Lord in charge of the bill moves, and
the Question is put:
"That the House do now resolve
itself into a committee upon the bill."
8.77 This motion is sometimes used as an opportunity
for a general discussion on the amendments or on the procedure
to be followed in committee or on whether to go into committee
at that time. The motion may be opposed by reasoned amendment
or by an amendment to postpone the committee stage or to discharge
the order of commitment and to commit the bill instead to another
committee, though opposition to the motion seldom occurs. When
the committee stage lasts more than one day, the motion moved
on a subsequent day "That the House do again resolve itself
into a committee upon the bill" may provide an opportunity
to raise matters relating to the progress of the bill. The rejection
of a motion to go into committee does not represent the rejection
of the bill, but merely the rejection of the proposition that
the bill be considered that day.
8.78 When the motion that the House go into committee
has been agreed to, the Lord on the Woolsack leaves the Woolsack
and takes the Chair at the Table of the House.
Powers and duties of chairman
8.79 The powers and duties of the Lord in the
Chair are the same as those of the Lord Speaker or Deputy Speaker
when the House is sitting (see paragraph 4.07). They are generally
confined to the calling on of clauses, Schedules and amendments
to bills referred to the committee, and putting the Question thereon.
The Lord in the Chair also makes the formal report of the committee
to the whole House. Like any other member, the Lord in the Chair
may vote but does not (as in the Commons) have a casting vote.
Powers of Committee of the whole
8.80 A Committee of the whole House can only
consider those matters which have been referred to it, including
any instruction to the committee given by the House. Where a bill
has been committed to a committee, the whole bill is the committee's
order of reference. A Committee of the whole House has no power
to adjourn the sitting or to adjourn its consideration of a bill
to a future sitting (though Committees of the whole House may
interrupt their consideration of a bill without Question put either
in an emergency (such as a member being taken ill) or for a lunch
or dinner break). If consideration of the bill is not completed,
the House is resumed on motion and can again go into committee
on a future day.
Procedure in Committee of the
8.81 SO 30, which forbids a member to speak more
than once to any motion, does not apply when the House is in committee.
A Next Business motion (see paragraph 4.56) is not permitted.
Clause stand part
8.82 As soon as the amendments to each clause
have been disposed of, the Lord in the Chair puts the Question
that the clause (or the clause as amended) stand part of the bill.
On this Question a general debate on the clause may take place.
Any member who wishes to leave out the clause speaks to this Question.
Warning of such opposition will normally have been given by means
of an italic notice on the marshalled list, and if there is no
italic notice any member who wishes to speak on "clause stand
part" should inform the Lord in the Chair. Once a clause
has been disposed of, the committee cannot return to it and consider
8.83 Where there are several consecutive clauses
to which no amendment has been set down, the Question is put on
all of them en bloc.~ If members wish to speak to one of
these clauses or move a manuscript amendment they may do so when
the clauses are called; but in this case they should warn the
Lord in the Chair of their intention, and that clause or those
clauses will then be dealt with separately.
Postponement of clauses~
8.84 Clauses or Parts may be postponed on a motion
made to that effect of which notice has been given; they may also
be postponed as the result of an instruction. A clause may be
postponed without notice after consideration of it has begun but
it may not be postponed if it has already been amended.
8.85 The Schedules to the bill are considered
in order after the clauses (unless there is an instruction to
the committee to take them in a different order) and are dealt
with in the same manner as clauses.
Preamble~ and long title~
8.86 As soon as the clauses and Schedules have
been disposed of, the Lord in the Chair puts without any motion
being moved the Questions on the preamble to the bill (if there
is one) and on the long title. Amendments to the preamble and
long title may be moved before each of these Questions is put.
8.87 Consequential or drafting amendments to
the long title are frequently agreed to. Preambles may be omitted
in committee and also amended, and it is in order to insert a
preamble in a bill where none exists.
House resumed during committee
8.88 If the committee stage is not completed
at one sitting, it is necessary for a member (usually a government
Whip) to move "That the House be resumed". When
this motion has been agreed to, the Lord in the Chair leaves the
Chair and the Lord Speaker or a Deputy Speaker takes the Woolsack.
The House goes into committee again either later on the same day
(on occasions when the House has been resumed in order to take
other business) or on a future day.
8.89 When it is agreed that there should be a
break during a committee stage, and there is no other business
to be taken, the House is not resumed and adjourned formally but
the committee simply adjourns without question put until a time
announced by a government Whip. ~
8.90 When the committee stage is resumed, the
committee proceeds from the point in the bill where it left off.
Conclusion of proceedings in
8.91 When the committee stage is completed the
Lord in the Chair states that the committee's proceedings have
concluded and that the House will now resume.
The Lord in the Chair then goes to the Woolsack to report the
bill to the House.
If the bill has been amended, an order is made for the bill to
be reprinted as amended, and the report stage takes place ("the
report is received") on a later date.
Report received immediately
8.92 If the bill is reported without amendment,
the member in charge of the bill may immediately move "That
this report be now received". If this is agreed to, the
next stage is third reading. It is, however, common for a separate
report stage to be taken on a later date even when the bill has
not been amended in committee.
This ensures that there is an opportunity to amend the bill before
Committee negatived or discharged
8.93 See paragraph 8.48.
ORDER OF COMMITMENT DISCHARGED~~
8.94 If no amendments have been set down to a
bill and it appears that no member wishes to move a manuscript
amendment or to speak to any clause or Schedule, the member in
charge of the bill may move that the order of commitment (or recommitment)
This motion may be moved only on the day the committee stage is
set down for and notice must be given on the order paper.
8.95 The member in charge of the bill says:
I understand that no amendments have been
set down to this bill, and that no noble Lord has indicated a
wish to move a manuscript amendment or to speak in committee.
Unless, therefore, any noble Lord objects,
I beg to move that the order of commitment [or recommitment] be
8.96 The Question is then put "That the
order of commitment [or recommitment] be discharged."
If this Question is agreed to, the next stage of the bill is third
8.97 If any member objects, however, this Question
cannot be completed and the member in charge of the bill must
at once move "That the House do now resolve itself into
a committee [or a committee on recommitment] upon the bill."
If this is agreed to, the House goes into committee in the usual
8.98 For the purposes of SOs 40(5) and 46, the
discharge of the order of commitment constitutes a stage of a
bill. Unless SO 46 has been suspended or dispensed with, third
reading may not be taken on the same day as that on which the
order of commitment has been discharged.
BILL REPORTED FORTHWITH
8.99 Where no amendment has been set down to
a bill and no member of the House has indicated a wish to speak,
but the order of commitment has not been discharged, the House
goes into committee. The Lord in the Chair then says:
Lords, I understand that no amendments have been set down to the
bill, and that no noble Lord has indicated a wish to move a manuscript
amendment or to speak in committee. With the agreement of the
committee, I will now report the bill to the House without amendment."
8.100 Members who wish to speak to any of the
clauses or Schedules or to move a manuscript amendment should
indicate their intentions on this Question, in which case the
Lord in the Chair must put the clauses and Schedules in the usual
way. If no member indicates a wish to speak, the House is resumed
without any question being put.
PROCEEDINGS IN GRAND
8.101 If a public bill is not committed to a
Committee of the whole House, it is usually committed to a Grand
Committee. ~As described above this is done on motion moved after
second reading. Any bill may be committed to a Grand Committee,
but bills which are unlikely to attract amendments and which would
have their committee stage discharged on the day of the committee
stage are not committed to Grand Committees.
8.102 It is in order for parts of a bill to be
committed to a Committee of the whole House and parts to a Grand
Committee. In such cases the two committees must sit consecutively;
usually the Committee of the whole House sits first and reports
the part of the bill committed to it before the Grand Committee
meets. Separate amendment sheets and marshalled lists are published
for each set of proceedings. When both committees' proceedings
are concluded an order is made that the bill be reprinted as amended.
8.103 The proceedings and forms of words in Grand
Committees are identical to those in a Committee of the whole
House save that no votes may take place. Normally only one bill
per day may be considered in Grand Committee. Amendments, which
may be tabled and spoken to by any member, are published and circulated
as for Committee of the whole House.
8.104 As divisions are not permitted in Grand
Committee, decisions to alter the bill may only be made by unanimity.
Thus when the Question is put, a single voice against an amendment
causes the amendment to be negatived.
If there is opposition to an amendment, it should be withdrawn,
to enable the House to decide the matter on report. For the same
reason the Question that a clause or Schedule stand part cannot
be disagreed to unless there is unanimity; provided there is a
single voice in favour, the clause or Schedule must be agreed
8.105 Unless the House orders otherwise, the
next stage of a bill reported from a Grand Committee is report.
OTHER COMMITTEE PROCEDURES
FOR PUBLIC BILLS
8.106 Certain other procedures have been developed
to scrutinise public bills, either instead of or additional to
proceedings in Committee of the whole House or Grand Committee.
These include a special public bill committee, and a select or
8.107 The purpose of these procedures is to enable
more detailed examination of bills to take place, involving the
hearing of evidence.
8.108 Unless the House orders otherwise, the
next stage of a bill reported from a special public bill committee
is report; but a bill reported from a select or joint committee
is recommitted to a Committee of the whole House, unless the committee
has recommended that the bill should not proceed.
8.109 Bills may be considered under these procedures
only if the House has agreed to a particular order of commitment.
It is usual for such a motion to be moved immediately after the
second reading has been agreed to. However, a motion to commit
a bill to a select or joint committee may be moved at any time
before third reading; and a motion that the order of commitment
to a Committee of the whole House (or to a Grand Committee) be
discharged and that an alternative order be made may be moved
any day before the committee stage begins. Notice is required
of any such motion.
8.110 The members of a special public bill committee,
or a select or joint committee, are subsequently appointed by
the House on the recommendation of the Committee of Selection.
Special public bill committee~
8.111 Special public bill committees are empowered
to take written and oral evidence on bills before considering
them clause by clause in the usual way. Law Commission bills are
normally committed to a special public bill committee,
but the procedure may also be used for any bill irrespective of
the House of introduction.
8.112 A bill is committed to a special public
bill committee by a motion moved after second reading by the member
in charge of the bill. The membership of the committee is proposed
by the Committee of Selection, and the government have a majority
over the other parties, with remaining places held by the Crossbench
members. It has been the practice for the relevant minister and
frontbench spokesmen from the other parties to be members. Any
member of the House who is not a member of the committee may attend
any public meeting of the committee, and may speak and move amendments,
but may not vote.
8.113 Unlike select committees empowered to
take evidence, a special public bill committee is not normally
given powers such as those to appoint advisers or to travel.
The committee may sit whether the House is sitting or not.
8.114 The relevant government department produces
with the bill a summary of the consultation undertaken, with an
indication of representations received and changes made. The evidence-taking
usually begins with the minister giving evidence, following which
the minister rejoins the committee on the other side of the table.
Special public bill committees must conclude their taking of evidence
within a 28-day period beginning with the date on which they are
appointed, excluding any adjournment of the House for more than
8.115 There is an interval after the conclusion
of the evidence taking, to enable members of the committee to
Notice of the proceedings is given on the order paper and amendments
for consideration in such proceedings are published and circulated
as for a Committee of the whole House. The committee then meets
to consider any amendments tabled. Proceedings are not time-limited.
8.116 Special public bill committees, when considering
amendments, follow the procedure of a committee stage in the Chamber
as closely as possible. Members speak standing and, so far as
they can, observe the same degree of formality as in the Chamber.
The committee may vote on amendments and motions: if the Question
cannot be decided by collecting the voices, the Clerk reads out
the names of the members of the committee. Each member when his
or her name is called replies "Content", "Not-content"
or "Abstain". If a division in the House is called during
the meeting the committee adjourns for 10 minutes.
8.117 If the bill is amended, it is published
in the usual way. The committee's report, which is recorded formally
by entry in the Minutes of Proceedings, consists only of the written
and oral evidence, together with the verbatim report of the special
public bill committee proceedings.
Bill committed to select or
8.118 ~A public bill (other than a consolidation
bill which is referred automatically after second reading to the
Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills under SO 51) may be committed
to a select committee~ or a joint committee when detailed investigation
is considered desirable or when the hearing of evidence is considered
necessary. To achieve this a motion is moved that a bill be committed
to a select committee or that a joint committee be appointed to
consider the bill. Such a motion is usually moved immediately
after second reading but is admissible at any stage before third
reading. If the bill has previously been committed to a Committee
of the whole House or Grand Committee, the order may be discharged
and an order made to commit the bill instead to a joint or to
a select committee. A motion may be tabled to commit a part of
a bill to a select committee. If the bill is referred to a joint
committee a message is sent to the House of Commons informing
them and desiring their agreement.
A bill may be committed to a select committee on another bill.
8.119 The method of appointment and powers of
the committee are the same as for an ad hoc committee on
a general subject (see paragraph 11.03); but the bill forms the
committee's order of reference and defines the scope of the inquiry.
8.120 When the committee has completed its deliberations,
it makes a report to the House on the provisions of the bill,
recommending whether or not it should proceed. The committee usually
gives reasons in a report similar to a report on a general subject.
The committee has no power to put an end to the bill. If it considers
that the bill should proceed, the committee reports it with such
amendments as it thinks fit, and the bill is then recommitted
to a Committee of the whole House in the form in which it has
been reported. When a committee makes amendments, formal minutes
of proceedings are required to record the amendments made. The
minutes of proceedings serve as the authority for the making of
the amendments and the reprinting of the bill as reported. If
the committee considers that it should not proceed, it reports
the bill accordingly, without amendment.
8.121 When a select committee reports that a
bill should not proceed, the bill is not recommitted to a Committee
of the whole House. The bill remains in the list of bills in progress
in House of Lords Business until the end of the session
under the heading "Reported from the select committee
that the bill should not proceed". The House normally
acquiesces in a report from a select committee recommending that
a bill should not proceed, and no further proceedings on the bill
take place. If a bill is to proceed, a motion, of which notice
is required, has to be agreed that the bill be recommitted to
a Committee of the whole House. A bill may also be recommitted
to a committee after the latter has reported that it should not
8.122 If a committee is unable to complete its
consideration of the bill, it makes a special report to that effect
and reports the bill without amendment.
8.123 A bill which has been referred to a select
or joint committee is, after being reported by that committee,
recommitted to a Committee of the whole House unless the select
or joint committee has reported that the bill should not proceed.
Consolidation bills and hybrid bills are the most common examples
of bills which are recommitted.
8.124 Other bills may, on motion (which is debatable
and of which notice is required) moved at any time between committee
and third reading, be recommitted to a Committee of the whole
House or Grand Committee in their entirety, or in respect of certain
clauses or Schedules.
8.125 This course is adopted when it is desirable
to give further detailed consideration to the bill or certain
parts of it without the constraints on speaking which apply on
report and third reading; for instance:
substantial amendments are tabled too late in the committee stage
to enable them to be properly considered;
there is extensive redrafting; or
amendments are tabled at a later stage on subjects which have
not been considered in committee.
This procedure reserves to the report stage its proper
function as an opportunity to review and perfect the bill as amended
8.126 A motion that the House resolve itself
into a committee on recommitment on a bill may be debated and
opposed in the same way as the motion to go into committee. Procedure
on recommitment is the same as in Committee of the whole House.
The next stage of any bill or part of a bill subject to recommitment
is report stage. However, the minimum interval between committee
and report does not apply between recommitment and report.
8.127 SO 47(2) provides for the order of recommitment
to be discharged on the same conditions as apply to the order
Consideration in Committee of
the whole House at later stages of bills
8.128 In exceptional circumstances the member
in charge of the bill may move that the House consider particular
amendments (including Commons amendments) in Committee of the
whole House without formally recommitting the bill.
~The effect, in accordance with SO 62, is to give greater "freedom
of debate" with regard to those amendments. When consideration
of the specific amendments is concluded the House is resumed,
and proceedings continue without further interruption; the bill
is not formally reported to the House, and no report or third
reading stage follows. The decisions of the committee in respect
of the amendments have the same effect as decisions taken by the
8.129 If a bill has been amended in Committee
of the whole House, the report stage cannot be taken until a later
day, unless SO 46 has been suspended or dispensed with.
8.130 The motion "That this report be
now received" may be objected to and debated and voted
on; an amendment may be moved to postpone the report until a specified
time; or a reasoned amendment
may be moved in opposition to the motion or to record a particular
point of view in assenting to the motion.
Amendments on report
8.131 When the Question that the report be now
received has been agreed to, any amendments are called in the
usual way. Notice of these is given in the same way as for committee,
and the same practices apply for marshalling and grouping. The
proceedings are confined to dealing with amendments, either in
the order in which they relate to the bill or in a particular
sequence agreed to in advance by order of the House.
8.132 Amendments identical (or of identical effect)
to amendments pressed to a vote by the mover and defeated in committee
may not be retabled on report. ~~However, an issue which has been
debated and voted on in committee can be reopened, provided that
the relevant amendment is more than cosmetically different from
that moved in committee.
8.133 An amendment agreed to on a vote in committee
may not be reversed on report except with the unanimous agreement
of the House. A clause or Schedule stood part on a vote in committee
may not be removed on report except with the unanimous agreement
of the House.
Amendments grouped and en
8.134 As in committee, amendments may be grouped,
and a member may ask leave to speak to a number of related amendments.
Likewise consecutive amendments may be moved en bloc but
without any need to confine each bloc within a clause or Schedule.
Opposition to clause or Schedule
8.135 The Question that the clauses and Schedules
stand part is not put on report, so a proposal to leave out a
clause or Schedule appears as an amendment. Such an amendment
should not be tabled if the purpose underlying the amendment is
to initiate a general debate, rather than a genuine desire to
leave out the clause or Schedule: it may, however, be appropriate
when, for instance, a member wishes to learn the outcome of an
undertaking given in committee.
8.136 Manuscript amendments~ are not out of order
on report, but the disadvantages and inconvenience attaching to
the moving of manuscript amendments on report are even greater
than at committee stage. The rule requiring the text of such amendments
to be read out to the House applies on report as in committee.
Rules of debate on report~
8.137 On report~ no member may speak more than
once to an amendment, except the mover of the amendment in reply
or a member who has obtained leave of the House, which may only
be granted to:
member to explain himself in some material point of his or her
speech, no new matter being introduced;
member in charge of the bill; and
· a minister
of the Crown.
8.138 Only the mover of an amendment or the member
in charge of the bill speaks after the minister on report except
for short questions of elucidation to the minister or member in
charge of the bill or where the minister speaks early to assist
the House in debate.
8.139 Arguments fully deployed either in Committee
of the whole House or in Grand Committee should not be repeated
at length on report~.
Conclusion of proceedings on
8.140 When the amendments have been disposed
of, the bill is reprinted if amended, and awaits its third reading
on a day to be fixed.
THIRD READING AND PASSING~~
8.141 The third reading of a bill is normally
confined to the formal motion "That this bill be now read
a third time". In exceptional circumstances a non-fatal
amendment to the motion for third reading may be tabled, for instance
to delay third reading so as to allow more time for amendments
to be tabled. Notice of such an amendment is required. In all
other circumstances, the motion for third reading is taken formally,
without debate. General debate on or opposition to the bill normally
now takes place on the subsequent motion "That this bill
do now pass".
Procedure on third reading
8.142 Amendments may be moved after the third
reading has been agreed to and before the motion that this bill
do now pass.
Notice of amendments
8.143 Except for privilege amendments (see paragraph
8.150), which are moved without notice, notice of amendments must
be given in sufficient time to enable them to be published and
circulated in the form in which it is proposed to move them.
Manuscript amendments are not in order. ~ Marshalled lists of
amendments are published on the day of third reading itself, rather
than the day before as for other stages.
Admissibility of amendments~~
8.144 The practice of the House is normally to
resolve major points of difference by the end of report stage,
and to use third reading for tidying up the bill.
8.145 The principal purposes of amendments on
third reading~ are:
clarify any remaining uncertainties;
· to improve
the drafting; and
· to enable
the government to fulfil undertakings given at earlier stages
of the bill.
8.146 An issue which has been fully debated and
voted on or negatived
at a previous stage of a bill may not be reopened by an amendment
on third reading.
8.147 Where the Legislation Office considers
that amendments fall clearly outside the guidance, including,
for example, amendments which are identical, or very similar,
to ones tabled and withdrawn at committee and report (unless tabled
to give effect to government undertakings), or amendments raising
completely new major issues, it will advise the member concerned.
If the member tables the amendments notwithstanding this advice,
the Legislation Office sends notification of these amendments
to all members of the usual channels and to the Convenor of the
Crossbench peers. They may then draw the matter to the attention
of the House; it is for the House itself to decide what action
8.148 In all other respects the procedure on
third reading is the same as that on report.
Further proceedings after third
8.149 If the amendments are not disposed of on
the same day as third reading, further proceedings after third
reading are taken on a later day.
8.150 On third reading of a bill originating
in the House of Lords whose provisions may infringe the privileges
of the House of Commons with regard to the control of public money,
a "privilege amendment" is made formally after all the
other amendments have been disposed of. The privilege amendment
is moved without notice, without the amendment being circulated
and without stating its nature. The amendment consists of a new
subsection, inserted at the end of the final clause of the bill,
in the following form:
) Nothing in this
Act shall impose any charge on the people or on public funds,
or vary the amount or incidence of or otherwise alter any such
charge in any manner, or affect the assessment, levying, administration
or application of any money raised by any such charge."
8.151 When the bill is published for the Commons
these words appear in bold type. The Commons leave out the subsection
by amendment and thus make the imposition of the charge their
8.152 The motion "That this bill do now
pass" is moved immediately after third reading has been
agreed to or, if amendments have been tabled, as soon as the last
amendment has been disposed of. The motion is usually moved formally.
It may be opposed, and reasoned or delaying amendments, of which
notice must be given, may be moved to it, but in other circumstances
there is normally no substantive debate. Any remarks should be
brief and should not seek to reopen debates at previous stages
of the bill.
8.153 When a bill is passed by the House in which
it has been introduced, a fair print of the bill, incorporating
all the amendments made by that House, is made. This is called
the House bill~~ and it is then sent to the other House accompanied
by a message seeking that House's agreement to it. Any amendments
made in either House in the subsequent passage of the Bill are
marked into the House bill, which is then returned to the other
House with a further message. The House bill constitutes the formal
record of what each House has done in respect of a bill and is
the authority on which each House prints the text of a bill or
any amendments brought from or made by the other.
8.154 Each time a bill is sent from one House
to the other the House bill is endorsed ~by the Clerk of that
House. The appropriate formulae, in Norman French, are given in
Bill sent or returned to Commons
8.155 When a bill originates in the Lords, the
House bill is endorsed and signed by the Clerk of the Parliaments
after third reading and sent to the Commons with a message seeking
their agreement to it. The Commons publish the bill in the form
in which it appears in the House bill.
8.156 If the Lords agree to a Commons bill without
amendment, proceedings on the bill are at an end. A message is
sent to the Commons so informing them and the bill awaits the
Royal Assent. The bill itself is only returned to the Commons
if it is a supply bill and the Royal Assent is to be signified
by Commission (see appendix F).
8.157 Where a Commons bill is amended in the
Lords, the amendments are marked into the House bill which is
then endorsed by the Clerk of the Parliaments and sent back to
the Commons with a message seeking the Commons' agreement to the
Lords amendments. The Commons then publish the Lords amendments.
PROCEEDINGS ON BILLS
RETURNED FROM THE COMMONS
8.158 If the Commons pass a Lords bill without
amendment, or if the only amendment made by the Commons is to
remove the privilege amendment made by the Lords, the bill then
awaits the Royal Assent. In the latter case the Commons amendment
is deemed to be considered and agreed to without any proceedings
taking place on it in the Chamber, and a message is sent to the
Commons informing them of the Lords' agreement.
8.159 If the Commons amend the bill in any other
respect, the amendments (including any privilege amendment) are
published and circulated. If the bill is returned when the House
is not sitting, the amendments are published pursuant to SO 50(2).
Consideration of Commons amendments~~~
8.160 When possible, reasonable notice should
be given for the consideration of Commons amendments; but, if
necessary, they may be considered forthwith on the day they are
received if a motion for that purpose is agreed to.
In such circumstances it is usual to give notice by means of an
italic note on the order paper.
Amendments to Commons amendments~
8.161 When a bill is returned from the Commons
with amendments, it is only those amendments which are before
the House. The other parts of the bill are no longer at issue,
having been agreed to by both Houses, and cannot be amended except
by a "consequential~~ amendment", that is, an amendment
immediately consequent upon the acceptance or rejection of a Commons
amendment. So further amendments proposed at this stage are only
admissible if they are relevant to a Commons amendment.
8.162 In dealing with a Commons amendment the
following options are open to the Lords:
agree to the Commons amendment, either (a) without amendment,
or (b) with a consequential amendment or an amendment in lieu
of the words left out of the bill by the Commons, or (c) an amendment
to the words restored to the bill by the Commons;
· to amend
the Commons amendment;
· to disagree
to the Commons amendment but to propose an alternative to it (an
amendment "in lieu");
· to disagree
to the Commons amendment.
8.163 Amendments to Commons amendments are handed
in to the Legislation Office and published in the usual way. An
amendment to a Commons amendment takes the same form as any other
amendment to an amendment (see 8.67). But a proposal to disagree
to a Commons amendment or to put forward an amendment in lieu
takes the form of an amendment to the motion that the House do
agree with the Commons in their amendment.
8.164 A marshalled list of amendments and motions
to be moved on consideration of Commons amendments is published
on the day on which the amendments are to be taken. In some cases,
where it is of assistance to the House, the text of the Commons
amendments, or of the relevant ones, is reproduced on the marshalled
list. Manuscript amendments~ to Commons amendments are not out
of order but the disadvantages and inconveniences of such amendments
are as great as on report.
Procedure on consideration of
8.165 Each Commons amendment is called from the
Woolsack in the order in which it relates to the bill, unless
the House orders differently. The member in charge of the bill
moves that the House do agree with the Commons in their amendment,
and the debate and decision follow as usual (see paragraph 8.656).
An amendment to a Commons amendment is moved as soon as the Question
on the Commons amendment has been put for the first time (see
paragraph 8.67). A motion to disagree to a Commons amendment or
to propose an amendment in lieu is moved as an amendment to the
motion to agree with the Commons amendment. If the motion to disagree
is agreed to, there are no further proceedings on the original
motion. If the motion to disagree is withdrawn or disagreed to,
the Question is put on the original motion that the House do agree
with the Commons in their amendment.
8.166 If the member in charge of the bill wishes
to move that the House disagree with a Commons amendment, the
procedure above does not apply and the motion to disagree is moved
as a motion in its own right and not as an amendment to a motion
8.167 If the member in charge of the bill wishes
to move that the House do agree or disagree to some or all of
the Commons amendments en bloc~~, and there is no other
motion or amendment tabled to those amendments, they explain their
intentions and ask leave of the House to do so when the first
of the bloc is called. If there is no objection the Question is
put accordingly. If there is objection the Question must be put
separately on each amendment to the extent desired.
8.168 The Legislation Office provides a brief
for all movers of amendments and motions at these stages.
Commons amendments agreed to
8.169 If all the Commons amendments are agreed
to without amendment, the bill awaits the Royal Assent.
Commons amendments agreed to
8.170 When the Lords agree to a Commons amendment
with an amendment, the bill is returned to the Commons with a
message to that effect. In dealing with the bill the Commons can
agree to the Lords amendments, or agree to them with amendments,
or disagree to them with or without proposing an alternative.
8.171 If the Commons amend the Lords amendments
and send the bill back accordingly, it then becomes the turn of
the Lords to agree or disagree to, or amend, such Commons amendments,
and the communications proceed in the same way as on the original
Commons amendments. At this and subsequent stages related amendments
and reasons appear together on the marshalled list and may, if
appropriate, be debated and decided together. A set of amendments
treated in this way is referred to as a "package". Packaging
~should be distinguished from the grouping of amendments at earlier
stages, whereby amendments are debated together but may be decided
Commons amendments disagreed
AMENDMENT IN LIEU OF COMMONS AMENDMENT
8.172 The Lords can disagree to a Commons amendment
but propose an amendment in lieu of it. When the bill goes back
to the Commons they can agree to the Lords amendment in lieu,
or propose an amendment to the amendment in lieu, or disagree
to the amendment in lieu with or without proposing an alternative.
8.173 If the Commons amend the Lords amendment
in lieu, or propose an alternative to it, the Lords can agree
to or amend the Commons amendment, propose a new alternative or
insist on their original amendment.
DISAGREEMENT TO COMMONS AMENDMENT WITH A REASON
8.174 If the Lords disagree to a Commons amendment
without proposing an alternative they have to give a reason for
their disagreement. A "reasons committee", usually of
three members, is appointed to do this. The committee consists
of the proposer of the disagreement and one supporter, together
with the member in charge of the bill or, in the case of a government
bill, some other minister, if desired. The committee meets in
the Prince's Chamber immediately after proceedings on Commons
amendments have been concluded and agrees upon the reason, which
is reported to the House by means of an entry in the Minutes of
8.175 In considering a Lords reason the Commons
may insist on their amendments with a reason; or not insist on
their amendments; or not insist on their amendments, but propose
others in lieu. The reason, or new amendments, are then considered
by the Lords in the same way as the original Commons amendments,
except that where the reason given by the Commons is on grounds
of privilege (see paragraph 8.183) the Lords do not insist on
8.176 If the Commons insist, it is still open
to the Lords not to insist on their disagreement, and thus to
accept the Commons amendments, or not to insist on their disagreement
but to amend the Commons amendments or propose alternatives. If
the Lords simply insist on their disagreement without offering
amendments or alternatives, the bill is lost.
Further communications between
the two Houses~~
8.177 Communications between the two Houses may
be carried on until the end of the session,
subject to these limitations:
parts of the bill which both Houses have agreed on cannot be amended
except by a "consequential amendment"~~ (see paragraph
· if the
reason given by the Commons for their disagreement is on the ground
of privilege, the Lords do not insist on their amendment.
8.178 In addition, if one House insists on an
amendment to which the other has disagreed, and the other insists
on its disagreement, and neither has offered alternatives, the
bill is lost. However, there is no binding rule of order which
governs these proceedings in either House, and, if there is a
desire to save a bill, some variation in the proceedings may be
devised in order to effect this object.
8.179 If any communications are still continuing
at the end of a session, the bill is lost.
LORDS AMENDMENTS TO
8.180 When any Lords amendments have been considered
by the Commons, the bill is sent back to the Lords:
the Lords amendments agreed to, in which case the bill is ready
for Royal Assent; or
the Lords amendments amended, or with amendments in lieu; or
the Lords amendments disagreed to, with reasons for such disagreement;
and communications, similar to those described for
bills originating in the Lords, take place between the two Houses.
LORDS AMENDMENTS AND
COMMONS FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE
8.181 ~Each House of Parliament is guardian of
its own privileges. It alone may invoke them. Until it does so,
the other House is free to act as it thinks fit. It follows that,
with regard to Commons financial privilege, the Lords may properly
make amendments to Commons bills (other than supply bills) which,
when they come to be considered by the Commons, are deemed by
them to infringe their financial privileges. It also follows that
the Lords need not anticipate what view the Commons may take of
any Lords amendments with respect to Commons financial privilege.
The only exceptions are amendments which prima facie are
material and intolerable infringements of privilege, in that they
either offend Commons SO 78(3)
or impose a charge not authorised by a Ways and Means resolution,
and which will be summarily rejected by the Commons unless they
have previously passed a supplementary financial resolution. Unless
there is reason to believe that the necessary supplementary financial
resolution will be made by the Commons, it is unprofitable for
the Lords to make amendments of this kind. When such Lords amendments
are considered by the Commons:
(a) in the case of an infringement of Commons
SO 78(3), the amendment is deemed to have been disagreed to without
debate and without Question put;
(b) in the case of a Lords amendment imposing
a charge upon the people which has not been authorised by a Ways
and Means resolution, the Speaker calls upon the member of the
Commons in charge of the bill to move to disagree with the Lords
8.182 With these exceptions, the Commons may
either invoke their financial privileges in respect of Lords amendments
or waive them; and the Commons regularly accept Lords amendments
which have financial implications. The Speaker of the Commons
directs that a "special entry" be made in their Journals
implicitly asserting their general rights but stating that the
Commons accept the Lords amendment, "the Commons being willing
to waive their privileges".
8.183 If the Commons disagree to a Lords amendment
that infringes their financial privileges, the disagreement is
made on the ground of privilege alone, and not on the merits of
the amendment, even though the Commons may have debated the merits.
The Commons communicate in their message to the Lords that the
amendment involves a charge upon public funds or a charge by way
of national or local taxation or that it in some other way deals
with financial arrangements made by the Commons; and they add
words to the effect that the Commons do not offer any further
reason, trusting that the reason given may be deemed sufficient.
In such cases the Lords do not insist on their amendment. But
they may offer amendments in lieu of amendments which have been
disagreed to by the Commons on the ground of privilege.
8.184 If the Commons disagree to a Lords amendment
which appears to have financial implications but offer an amendment
in lieu or an amendment to the words restored to the bill, financial
privilege is not at that stage invoked by the Commons and the
question whether the Lords amendment infringes privilege does
not arise. It is therefore open to the Lords to disagree to the
Commons amendment in lieu and to insist on the original Lords
amendment, which is then returned with the bill to the Commons
for further consideration by them.
CONSENT OF THE CROWN~~~
8.185 Where a bill affects the prerogative or
interest of the Crown, the Consent of the Crown is required and
in respect of public bills must, after it has been obtained by
Her Majesty's Government, be signified to the House by a minister
who is a Privy Counsellor~. This Consent places the Crown's prerogative
and interest at the disposal of Parliament for the purposes of
the bill, but does not imply that the Crown approves the provisions
that require its Consent.
8.186 A bill affecting the interests of the Duchy
of Cornwall or the Duchy of Lancaster requires Consent~, unless
the Crown's Consent has been obtained and the effect on the Duchy
is not distinct from that on the Crown. In such a case Consent
is given by the Crown on behalf of each Duchy or, when the Prince
of Wales~ is of age, by Him as Duke of Cornwall.
8.187 The Consent of the Crown is signified on
It may also be signified on consideration of Commons amendments
if it has not been previously signified and one of the Commons
amendments makes it necessary. If a bill requires Consent and
is carried over from one session to the next, Consent need not
be re-signified in the second session.
8.188 When it is known that Consent to a bill
is required, this is noted in the list of bills in progress in
House of Lords Business.
MEASURES~ AND PRIVATE BILLS
8.189 Consent of the Crown may also be required
in respect of a Measure~ or a private bill (see paragraphs 8.225
8.190 Letters Patent are issued from time to
time to signify the Royal Assent to bills and Measures passed
by both Houses of Parliament.
8.191 Royal Assent is usually notified to each
House sitting separately in accordance with the Royal Assent Act
1967. Once Royal Assent has been notified to both Houses, bills
become Acts of Parliament. If notification is given on different
days to each House, the date of Royal Assent is the date of notification
in the second House.
8.192 Notification is frequently given before
oral questions, but it may take place at any break between two
items of business, or at the end of business, if necessary after
an adjournment. The order in which notification is given is as
follows: supply bills, other public bills, provisional order confirmation
bills, private bills, personal bills, Measures.
8.193 Royal Assent may also be signified by Commission,
as described in appendix F.
REFUSAL OF ROYAL ASSENT
8.194 The power to refuse Royal Assent was last
exercised in 1708, when Queen Anne refused Her Assent to a bill
for settling the Militia in Scotland.
Record copies of Acts
8.195 ~Two record copies of each Act are printed,
Public Acts on vellum and Private Acts on durable paper. One copy
is signed and endorsed by the Clerk of the Parliaments. This copy
is preserved in the Parliamentary Archives, the other in the National
PROCEDURES WHICH APPLY
ONLY TO CERTAIN TYPES OF BILL
Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949~
8.196 Under the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949
certain public bills may be presented for the Royal Assent without
the consent of the Lords. The Acts do not apply to bills originating
in the Lords, bills to extend the life of a Parliament beyond
five years, provisional order confirmation bills, private bills
or delegated legislation. The conditions which must be fulfilled
before a bill can be presented for the Royal Assent under the
Acts vary according to whether or not the bill is certified by
the Speaker of the House of Commons as a money bill.
8.197 A money bill is a bill endorsed with the
signed certificate of the Speaker of the House of Commons that
it is a money bill because in the Speaker's opinion it contains
only provisions dealing with national, but not local, taxation,
public money or loans or their management. The certificate of
the Speaker is conclusive for all purposes. If a money bill, which
has been passed by the Commons and sent up to the Lords at least
one month before the end of a session, is not passed by the Lords
without amendment within a month after it is sent to them, the
bill shall, unless the Commons direct to the contrary, be presented
for the Royal Assent without the consent of the Lords. This does
not debar the Lords from amending such bills provided they are
passed within the month, but the Commons are not obliged to consider
the amendments. On a few occasions minor amendments have been
made by the Lords to such bills and have been accepted by the
OTHER PUBLIC BILLS
8.198 If the Lords reject any other public bill
to which the Acts apply which has been sent up from the Commons
in two successive sessions, whether of the same Parliament or
not, then that bill shall, unless the Commons direct to the contrary,
be presented for the Royal Assent without the consent of the Lords.
The bill must be sent up to the Lords at least one calendar month
before the end of each session; and one year must elapse between
second reading in the Commons in the first session and the passing
of the bill by the Commons in the second. The Lords are deemed
to have rejected a bill if they do not pass it, either without
amendment or with such amendments only as are acceptable to the
Commons. The effect of the Parliament Acts is that the Lords have
power to delay enactment of a public bill until the session after
that in which it was first introduced and until at least 13 months
have elapsed from the date of second reading in the Commons in
the first session.
8.199 Supply bills, or bills of aids and supplies,
such as Consolidated Fund Bills and Finance Bills, may be passed
or rejected by the Lords but, since the supply is granted by the
House of Commons, the Lords are debarred from offering any amendment.
Consequently the committee stage is negatived.
Proceedings on Consolidated Fund Bills are always taken formally;
Finance Bills are usually debated on second reading and their
subsequent stages taken formally.
8.200 When these bills have been passed by the
Lords, they are returned to the Commons if the Royal Assent is
to be signified by Commission, and are brought up by the Speaker
and receive the Royal Assent before, and in a different form from,
all other bills.
8.201 A supply bill may, or may not, be certified
as a "money bill" within the meaning of s. 1(2) of the
Parliament Act 1911. Finance Bills, which are supply bills, are
frequently not certified as money bills.
8.202 The right of the Lords to reject a supply
bill includes the right to omit supply provisions from a bill
when such provisions form a "separate subject" from
the general object of the bill, which the Lords are otherwise
entitled to amend.
8.203 For example the Lords amended Part III
of the Land Commission Bill 1966-67 (which provided for a betterment
levy). The Lords amended the part in committee although it concerned
supply, but then left it out in its entirety on third reading,
since it would have been an infringement of Commons financial
privilege to return the bill with that part concerning supply
amended. This gave the Commons the opportunity to restore the
entire separate subject to the bill with amendments, including
some of the Lords amendments made in committee.
8.204 Commons financial privilege~ debars the
Lords from amending supply bills. In order that the Commons should
not abuse their financial privilege by including in such bills
provisions unconnected with supply, the Lords passed a resolution
in 1702 condemning the abuse of "tacking". It is now
embodied in SO 52.
8.205 Consolidation bills are invariably introduced
in the House of Lords, and are subject to scrutiny by the Joint
Committee on Consolidation Bills (see paragraph 8.209). Such bills
fall into the following categories:
(a) bills, whether public or private, which are
limited to re-enacting existing law;
(b) bills to consolidate any enactments with
amendments to give effect to recommendations made by the Law Commissions;
(c) statute law repeals bills, prepared by the
Law Commissions to promote the reform of the statute law by the
repeal of enactments which are no longer of practical utility;
(d) statute law revision bills, which are limited
to the repeal of obsolete, spent, unnecessary or superseded enactments;
(e) bills prepared under the Consolidation of
Enactments (Procedure) Act 1949~, which include corrections and
minor improvements to the existing law.
8.206 Almost all such bills now fall within categories
(a) to (c).
8.207 Bills which re-enact in the form in which
they apply to Scotland the provisions of United Kingdom Acts,
and consequential provisions bills which, although not consolidation
bills, contain ancillary provisions normally found in a consolidation
bill and form part of a consolidation,
have also on occasion been specifically referred to the Joint
Committee on Consolidation Bills on motion. If the motion is agreed
to, a message is sent to the Commons to ask for their agreement.
8.208 On second reading the Lord in charge of
the bill may indicate to the House the category into which each
bill falls. The bill is then automatically referred to the Joint
Committee on Consolidation Bills.
JOINT COMMITTEE ON CONSOLIDATION BILLS~
8.209 The joint committee consists of 12 members
of each House, the Lords members being nominated by the Committee
It is normally chaired by a former holder of high judicial office.
The function of the joint committee is to assure itself that all
the provisions of a bill fall properly within one of the categories
previously indicated, and to report thereon to each House. After
taking evidence from the draftsmen responsible and any departmental
or other witnesses, the joint committee reports the bill to the
House of Lords with or without amendment. Where amendments are
made by the joint committee, bills are usually reprinted as amended.
Whether or not amended, they are then recommitted to a Committee
of the whole House. Thereafter consolidation bills follow the
same course as other public bills.
8.210 Amendments may be moved in the House to
bills that have been referred to the joint committee, provided
that they are restricted to the class of amendment that could
have been moved in the joint committee.
MOVING OF STAGES OF CONSOLIDATION BILLS EN BLOC~
8.211 Where the same stage of several linked
consolidation bills is to be considered by the House, the Lord
in charge may, with notice (given by means of an italic note in
House of Lords Business), move the bills en bloc.
In the case of an amending stage, this is only possible if no
amendments have been tabled. Any member may, however, propose
that the bills be taken separately to the extent desired. The
House can also resolve itself into a committee on recommitment
in respect of several consolidation bills at once in order to
debate any amendments tabled; the committee reports only when
all the bills have been considered. In this case the procedure
is applied by business of the House motion.
8.212 Hybrid bills are public bills which are
considered to affect specific private or local interests, in a
manner different from the private or local interests of other
persons or bodies of the same class, thus attracting the provisions
of the standing orders applicable to private business (see paragraph
REFERENCE OF BILLS TO EXAMINERS~
8.213 Each public bill introduced in the Lords
is examined by the Legislation Office to see whether it may affect
any private interests to which protection is given by the Standing
Orders. If, prima facie, this is found to be so, an order
is made referring the bill to the Examiners. The second reading
of the bill cannot be moved until the report of the Examiners
has been received nor, in the case of a bill requiring an environmental
statement, until certain other actions have occurred (see paragraph
8.218 below), although notice of second reading of the bill may
be entered in the order paper.
8.214 It is open to any member who considers
that a public bill may be hybrid, or has become hybrid as a result
of any amendment made to it (see below), to move that the bill
be referred to the Examiners. Such a motion is usually moved immediately
before second reading, but may be moved with notice between stages
at any time before third reading.
REPORT FROM EXAMINERS
8.215 If the Examiners report that no standing
orders are applicable, the bill may proceed on its ordinary course.
8.216 However, if the Examiners find that the
standing orders relating to private business are applicable, the
bill is a hybrid bill, and (unless the House orders otherwise)
an order of the House is made providing for petitions~ against
the bill to be deposited by a given date.
8.217 If no petitions are deposited against the
bill, the bill proceeds as a public bill in the usual way. If
petitions are deposited, the bill is committed after second reading
to a select committee.
CONSULTATION ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
8.218 If a hybrid bill requires an environmental
statement to be prepared
comments from the public must be invited on the statement within
a period set by the relevant minister.
Once those comments have been received by the government department
a report must be prepared within a specified timeframe by an independent
assessor summarising the issues raised in those comments. That
report is submitted to both Houses. The second reading of the
bill cannot be moved until at least 14 days after the report has
been submitted. Any supplementary environmental information subsequently
deposited will be subject to a similar process and the third reading
of the bill cannot be moved until 14 days after the last assessor's
report has been submitted. At third reading the minister must
state the main reasons and considerations upon which Parliament
is invited to give consent to the project to be authorised by
the bill and also the main measures to be taken to avoid, reduce
and, if possible, offset any major adverse effects of the project.
A written statement setting out this information must be laid
at least seven days before third reading.
8.219 Since the bill is a public bill, and has
been affirmed in principle on second reading, the preamble~ does
not have to be proved before the select committee; but in other
respects the committee broadly follows the procedure of a select
committee on an opposed private bill (see paragraph 9.37). When
the bill is reported from the select committee it is recommitted
to a Committee of the whole House or a Grand Committee and thereafter
follows the usual course of a public bill (subject to the requirements
at third reading for a bill needing an environmental statement
set out in paragraph 8.218). The bill is reprinted as amended
by the select committee and the amendments are published separately.
8.220 A bill may become prima facie hybrid
as a result of an amendment made to it (and a hybrid bill may
be amended in such a way as to affect private or local interests
not previously affected). If an amendment is agreed to which,
in the opinion of the Legislation Office, has such an effect,
the bill may be referred to the Examiners before its next stage,
on a motion moved by the Chairman of Committees.
8.221 A Measure passed by the General Synod of
the Church of England is, under the Church of England Assembly
(Powers) Act 1919, as amended by the Synodical Government Measure
1969, submitted to Parliament for a resolution directing that
it be presented to Her Majesty for Royal Assent.
8.222 The Measure is submitted first to the Ecclesiastical
Committee~, which is appointed pursuant to the 1919 Act for the
duration of a Parliament and which consists of 15 members of the
House of Lords, nominated by the Lord Speaker, and 15 members
of the House of Commons, nominated by the Commons Speaker. The
committee appoints its own chairman; by practice, this is a former
holder of high judicial office. Being a statutory committee, the
committee is not formally a joint committee, nor are its proceedings
"proceedings in Parliament";
but it has resolved to adopt the procedure of a joint committee.
8.223 The committee reports on the nature and
legal effect of the Measure, and gives its views on whether the
Measure should proceed ("is expedient"), especially
with relation to the constitutional rights of all Her Majesty's
subjects. During its consideration of a Measure the Ecclesiastical
Committee may, either of its own motion or at the request of the
Legislative Committee of the General Synod, invite the Legislative
Committee to discuss its provisions at a conference.
8.224 The committee communicates its report in
draft to the Legislative Committee, and may not present its report
to Parliament until the Legislative Committee asks it to do so.
The Legislative Committee may, at any time before the presentation
of the Ecclesiastical Committee's report to Parliament, withdraw
a Measure from the consideration of that committee, and has invariably
done so in the face of an unfavourable draft report.
8.225 If the Legislative Committee decides to
proceed with the Measure, the text of the Measure and the report
of the Ecclesiastical Committee are laid before Parliament. If
the Chairman of Committees and the Chairman of Ways and Means
in the Commons think that a Measure deals with two or more subjects
which might more properly be divided, they can divide a Measure
at this point and it is published as separate Measures. A resolution
for presenting the Measure to Her Majesty for Royal Assent may
then be moved. Where a Measure affects the interests or prerogative
of the Crown, Consent is required as for a bill~. It is signified
before the motion is moved in the House. If both Houses agree
to such a motion, the Measure is ready for Royal Assent.
8.226 Neither the Ecclesiastical Committee nor
either House has power to amend a Measure, but either House can
reject it by disagreeing to the motion for a resolution.
305 LJ (1971-72) 159. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1976-77. Back
The fourteen-day periods are inclusive of the day on which the
previous stage is concluded. The three-day period is exclusive. Back
HL Deb. 15 December 2009, col. WS238. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1987-88; 1st Rpt 1991-92. Back
Procedure 3rd Rpt 1997-98. In the Lords, the Constitutional Reform
Bill [HL] was carried over from session 2003-04 to 2004-05, and
the Trusts (Capital and Income) Bill [HL] from 2010-12 to 2012-13.
In the Commons, the power to carry over has been used more frequently.
Procedure 3rd Rpt 2013-14. Back
Scotland Act 1998, s. 28(7); Northern Ireland Act 1998 s. 5(6);
Government of Wales Act 2006, ss. 93(5), 107(5). Back
HL Deb. 28 October 1998, cols 1947-52. The "Sewel convention".
This was stated in proceedings on the Scotland Bill 1998, and
it is reflected in the Concordat between the Government and the
Scottish Government about bills. The Concordat states that in
practice consultation with the Scottish Government is sufficient,
on the ground that the Scottish Government will then consult the
Scottish Parliament. This principle applies to the other devolved
SO 41(3). Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1997-98. Back
This requirement does not apply to private members' bills. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 2001-02. Back
HL Deb. 19 July 1989, cols 788-91; Procedure 3rd Rpt 1992-93. Back
LJ (1979-80) 1358; LJ (1999-2000) 627. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1999-2000. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 2007-08; 2nd Rpt 2010-12. Back
The Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12 was committed in part
to a Grand Committee and in part to a Committee of the whole House
(LJ (2010-12 1689), as was the Deregulation Bill 2014-15 (Minutes
of Proceedings, 30 July 2014). In such cases the proceedings take
place sequentially and the bill is reported in respect of the
clauses and Schedules separately from each committee. Back
SO 47(1); Procedure 1st Rpt 1970-71. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1990-91. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1976-77. Back
See HL Deb. 6 February 1968, cols 1075-86. Back
SO 38. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1974-75. Back
HL Deb. 11 June 1964, cols 986-1001; Procedure 1st Rpt 1983-84.
e.g. HL Deb. 21 January 1997, col. 586. Back
But see paragraph Error! Reference source not found.. Back
HL Deb. 21 March 1984, col. 1325. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1976-77; 1st Rpt 1987-88. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1991-92. Back
Under SO 62 the Lord Speaker may preside over Committee of the
whole House. Back
SO 62. Back
See also SO 62. Back
Procedure 4th Rpt 2014-15. Back
Or, if the Lord Speaker or another Deputy Speaker takes over
the Woolsack, the Lord who was in the Chair may report the bill
from the government front bench. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1956-57. Back
SO 47(2). Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 2014-15. Back
See paragraph 7.02 Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 2007-08. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1994-95. Back
SO 65. Back
In 2012-13 the special public bill committee on the Partnerships
(Prosecution) (Scotland) Bill [HL] was given power to travel:
LJ (2012-13) 697-98. In 2014-15 the special public bill committee
on the Insurance Bill [HL] was given power to appoint a specialist
adviser: Minutes of Proceedings, 25 November 2014. Back
Procedure 3rd Rpt 1970-71; 2nd Rpt 1987-88. Back
Amendments may be tabled in the usual way at any time after second
LJ (1992-93) 161, 163; LJ (1993-94) 586, 682; HL Deb. 13 December
1995, cols 1279-88. Back
LJ (1958-59) 97. Back
LJ (1854-55) 277, 334. Back
LJ (2008-09) 868. Back
See paragraphs Error! Reference source not found.-8.41. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1998-99. Back
Procedure 9th Rpt 1970-71. Back
SO 30. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1987-88. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1976-77. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1980-81. Back
SO 48. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 2005-06. Back
See paragraph 7.02 Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1976-77. The term "issue" is wider
than a specific amendment. Thus where amendments have been grouped
and debated together at an earlier stage of the bill it is assumed
that all amendments in the group relate to the same "issue".
Procedure 1st Rpt 2006-07. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1998-99; 4th Rpt 2014-15. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1987-88. SO 41(4). Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1999-2000. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 1989-90. Back
Procedure 1st Rpt 2004-05. Back
Exchanges between the Houses at this stage are governed by provisions
set out in Procedure 1st Rpt 2004-05. Back
Erskine May, p. 636. For an example see the proceedings
on the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill 2003-04: LJ (2003-04)
"If the Speaker is satisfied that a Lords amendment imposes
a charge upon the public revenue such as is required to be authorised
by resolution of the House under Standing Order No. 49 (Certain
proceedings relating to public money) and that such charge has
not been so authorised, on reaching that amendment, the Speaker
shall declare that he is so satisfied and the amendment shall
be deemed to have been disagreed to and shall be so recorded in
Procedure 3rd Rpt 2014-15. Back
Procedure 4th Rpt 2014-15. Back
LJ (1705-09) 506. Back
See paragraph 8.47. Back
Procedure 3rd Rpt 1992-93. Back
See appendix F. Back
LJ (1701-05) 185. Back
LJ (1972-73) 383. Back
Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills 4th Rpt 1987-88. Back
SO 51. Back
Report of the Select Committee on the Speakership of the House
of Lords, HL Paper 92, 2005-06. Back
Procedure 2nd Rpt 1991-92. Back
PBSO 27A. Back
PBSO 83A. Back
See paragraph Error! Reference source not found.. Back