Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Earl Russell asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Lord Chancellor (Lord Mackay of Clashfern): The question whether a particular power is obsolete and should be repealed will fall to be considered first and foremost by the department responsible for the enabling legislation. In addition, the Law Commission has a duty under Section 3(1)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 to prepare draft Bills, pursuant to programmes of consolidation and statute law revision approved by the Lord Chancellor, for the repeal of obsolete and unnecessary enactments.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Henley): A recommendation for listing a church or chapel would normally be made by English Heritage to the Secretary of State for Heritage (or by the appropriate national heritage body for Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland) as a result of their surveys, including thematic studies which English Heritage are at present conducting on Ministry of Defence buildings such as barracks, dockyards and aviation structures. Where a site is in disposal, my department will make a proposal for listing or, alternatively, apply for a certificate of immunity where this is judged necessary to remove uncertainty about whether a building should be given statutory protection.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Countess of Mar asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Baroness Cumberlege): The Department of Health has committed grant aid towards the central administrative costs of the Samaritans in England as follows: £155,000 in 1994/95, £135,000 in 1995/96 and £115,000 for 1996/97. The department has also awarded the Samaritans a project grant of £50,000 per annum for three years from 1994/95 towards an Outreach Programme project to help make its services available to vulnerable people in rural areas. In addition, the Home Office provides a grant of £46,300 over two years for the central costs of the Samaritans' service in prisons in England and Wales. The Welsh Office provided £4,000 in 1993 for a rural Samaritans initiative in Wales.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Blatch): Immigration detention centres are run on the lines of secure hostels allowing detainees free movement and association within a secure perimeter. The accommodation is unsuitable for disruptive detainees. There will continue to be a need to transfer to the more secure conditions provided by Prison Service establishments those detainees whose behaviour poses a threat to their own safety or to that of staff or other detainees, or when the good order and discipline of the centre requires this to be done.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Blatch: The initial detention of an immigration offender arrested within the United Kingdom will continue to require the use of police cells. However, the Immigration (Places of Detention) Direction 1994 limits detention under these powers in police cells to a maximum of five days (seven days if directions for removal within that period have been given). Every effort is made to transfer Immigration Act detainees to more suitable accommodation as soon as this can be arranged.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Blatch: Detainees in immigration detention centres and Prison Service establishments have access on a daily basis to a doctor. There is also a nurse present daily at the Harmondsworth, Gatwick Airport and the Campsfield House detention centres. A detainee who requires further medical attention may be transferred to a prison or outside hospital. The Government are satisfied that these arrangements, which are reviewed regularly, provide satisfactory medical care and facilities at existing Immigration Act detention centres.
Lord Hylton asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Blatch: Court proceedings data collected centrally by my department relating to murder offences do not identify where the offence took place.
There have been no prosecutions in England and Wales for genocide, slavery and torture.
Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |