Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

20 Jun 1995 : Column WA7

Written Answers

Tuesday, 20th June 1995.

Parliamentary Publications: On-Line Availability

Earl Alexander of Tunis asked the Leader of the House:

    What steps are being taken to make current and back copies of Hansard available on line (accessible by electronic means), and whether they could apply also to reports of other Parliamentary proceedings.

The Lord Privy Seal (Viscount Cranborne): Recent Hansards of both Houses are now available on CD-ROM. The Lords' Hansard is available for session 1992–93 and that for session 1993–94 will be published by the end of June. Plans to make current Lords' Hansards available on-line are at an early stage of preparation. The extension of on-line coverage to select committee proceedings would be possible but is not planned at present.

Student Loan: Rate

Baroness Stedman asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Why there is no difference between the arrangements for student loans for courses that last for 30 weeks each year with 22 weeks' vacation and clinical, medical, dental and veterinary courses which last for 48 weeks a year with four weeks' vacation, given the difference in opportunity to secure earnings under these respective regimes.

Lord Lucas: The full-year rate of student loan is intended to cover the entire academic year for all borrowers. The main rate of the means-tested mandatory award is intended to cover normal term-time attendance on the course and the short vacations. Where students are required to attend their course for longer periods, they are entitled to an "extra weeks" allowance in addition to the main rate of their mandatory award. This allowance, currently £55.45 for most students, provides additional resources to supplement the full-year student loan. It is payable for each week or part of a week of the extra period during which the student attends his course. Where the student attends his course for 48 weeks in the year, the allowance is also payable for the four weeks' vacation.

Toxicity Trials: 1953 MAFF Report

The Countess of Mar asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether reports of the acute and chronic toxicity trials of herbicides, systemic insecticides and rodenticides mentioned in paragraph 1 of page 50 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

20 Jun 1995 : Column WA8

    Report on the Animal Health Services in Great Britain 1953 have been published; and, if so, from where can they be obtained.

The Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Earl Howe): The Central Veterinary Laboratory's experimental protocols and working reports are no longer available for this period. However, a number of papers arising from this work were published in scientific literature as follows:

    J. L. McGirr and D. S. Papworth 1953

    Toxic Hazards of the Newer Insecticides and Herbicides

    Veterinary Record 65, p857–862.

    J. L. McGirr (1953)

    Poisoning of Livestock by the Newer Rodenticides, Insecticides and Weed Killers

    Paper presented at XVth International Veterinary Congress, Stockholm 9–15 August 1953.

    J. L. McGirr and D. S. Papworth 1955

    Toxicity of Rodenticides, Sodium Fluoroacetate, Antu and Warfarin

    Veterinary Record 67, p124–131.

    R. J. Fitzpatrick, J. L. McGirr and D. S. Papworth 1955

    Toxicity of Rodenticides II; Red Squill and Zinc Phosphate

    Veterinary Record 67, p142–145.

All these papers are available through the House of Lords Library.

Fisheries Council, 15 June

Lord Trefgarne asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What was the outcome of the Fisheries Council held in Luxembourg on 15 June.

Earl Howe: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food represented the United Kingdom at the meeting of the Fisheries Council in Luxembourg on 15 June together with my honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in the Scottish Office, Sir Hector Monro.

The Council agreed unanimously ceilings on fishing effort in Western waters as required by the agreement reached in December on the integration of Spain and Portugal into the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The figures agreed reflect actual recent fishing effort and will enable UK fishermen to continue their normal patterns and levels of fishing activity without new restriction, provided effort does not increase. Limitations on the disposition of the Spanish fleet in the Irish Box were also introduced, with the result that a maximum of eight vessels are allowed in the northern part and a maximum of 32 in the south.

The Commission presented to the Council its proposals for monitoring and inspection arrangements in Western waters. These measures are important because

20 Jun 1995 : Column WA9

they will provide the basis for enforcing effort controls. My honourable friend confirmed to the Council that these proposals must be both practicable and realistic in terms of their application. The Council agreed to consider them urgently so that they can be adopted before the end of this year and come into operation along with the effort controls from 1 January 1996.

Most member states indicated they could agree to a Presidency compromise concerning a proposal for funds from the existing Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) to be used to support national early retirement schemes for fishermen and for compensation payments to crews of decommissioned vessels. The Commission's original proposals relating to bad weather payments and additional support for market price fluctuation were excluded. The United Kingdom continued to argue that such measures should be covered by national social policies and were not an appropriate use of FIFG funds.

There was a discussion of drift net fishing and once again no conclusions were reached on the Commission's proposal, dating from last year, to phase out the use of drift nets. My honourable friend emphasised the importance of drift net fishing to British fishermen. My honourable friend also set out the arrangements which we have in hand to ensure compliance with the rules in this summer's tuna fishery in the North-East Atlantic and to discourage any possible disruption of fishing. The Council noted with satisfaction the measures being implemented by member states and the deployment of a vessel carrying Commission inspectors.

The Council discussed progress in the United Nations Conference on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. This conference is looking at ways of improving co-operation between states in the management of international fisheries. My honourable friend stressed the importance of achieving a binding convention which will lead to more effective conservation of fish stocks in international waters and should reduce the risk of disputes. The Council agreed that the Community should continue to play a constructive role in the negotiations and decided that further work should be done in defining its position before the next session of the Conference.

The Council confirmed its commitment to the full implementation of the April agreement reached between the Community and Canada on fishing in the North-West Atlantic including the important new provisions to secure effective enforcement. It agreed unanimously to adopt a regulation fixing the 1995 Community quota for Greenland halibut at 5,013 tonnes for the period from 16 April onwards.

The Council unanimously agreed a Presidency compromise setting quotas for imports of fish into the Community at reduced rates of import duty for the remainder of 1995. The quotas on cod and haddock were set lower than proposed by the Commission, reflecting concern about weak market prices.

My honourable friend drew the Council's attention to a Commission proposal to be considered by the Agriculture Council which would introduce

20 Jun 1995 : Column WA10

harmonisation of inspection charges for fish. He said that in the absence of distortion of the market this is an unnecessary measure which could increase costs. My honourable friend pressed his colleagues to look at the proposal critically, involving fisheries experts to the full.

My honourable friend also took the opportunity of this meeting of the Council to invite Fisheries Ministers to consider a proposal made by the Government's Panel on Sustainable Development that there should be an Intergovernmental Panel on the Oceans. This Panel would be set the task of examining the science, assessing the human impact and putting in place a framework for the responsible management of the world's oceans. It would cover fish stocks, other marine resources and measures to cope with pollution. The Government are currently studying this proposal and wish to take into account the views of other member states before reaching conclusions.

Persian Gulf: Regional Surveillance Proposal

Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they are now, or will be associated with the US Navy's proposal to set up a string of aerostats in Kuwait, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates to provide round the clock surveillance of the Persian Gulf region, and whether the suggestion has the approval of the states in question.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Henley): Her Majesty's Government have no knowledge of this proposal. This is a matter for the governments concerned.

Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page